Energetic, economic, and environmental assessment of a Stirling engine based gasification CCHP system

被引:38
作者
Chen, Jialing [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Li, Xian [3 ,4 ]
Dai, Yanjun [1 ,4 ]
Wang, Chi-Hwa [2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Res Ctr Solar Energy & Refrigerat, Shanghai 200240, Peoples R China
[2] Natl Univ Singapore, Dept Chem & Biomol Engn, 4 Engn Dr 4, Singapore 117585, Singapore
[3] Natl Univ Singapore, NUS Environm Res Inst, Singapore 138602, Singapore
[4] Energy & Environm Sustainabil Solut Megac E2S2, Campus Res Excellence & Technol Enterprise CREATE, Singapore 138602, Singapore
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
Biomass gasification; Stirling engine; CCHP; Food waste; 3E analysis; POWER-GENERATION SYSTEM; BIOMASS GASIFICATION; FLUIDIZED-BED; THERMODYNAMIC ASSESSMENT; WOODY BIOMASS; WASTE; GASIFIER; SYNGAS; COAL; SIMULATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.116067
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Due to the tar contamination caused by the gasification process of biomass, the internal combustion engine (ICE) based gasification cogeneration systems require complicated gas cleaning devices to purify producer gas. In this paper, a Stirling engine based gasification combined cooling, heat and power (CCHP) system was introduced, which has the capability of mitigating tar condensation and contamination. The gasification CCHP system, including the gasification system, the Stirling engine system, and the absorption chiller system, can provide electricity, heat and cooling for a commercial building. The effects of the equivalence ratio on syngas composition and cold gas efficiency of the gasification process were analyzed herein. The optimal systems in Singapore and Shanghai can save respectively 75.9% and 70.5% levelized total cost compared to a conventional reference system. The Stirling engine based CCHP system had advantages over the ICE systems on overall consideration of the levelized total cost and the primary energy saving ratio. The monthly energetic, economic and environmental performance of the CCHP systems was evaluated under different modes and the above two systems' primary energy saving ratios, operation cost reduction ratios and CO2 equivalent reduction ratios respectively reached 0.886, 0.462 and 0.701 in Singapore and 0.908, 0.535 and 0.710 in Shanghai in annual operation. The outcomes of this paper contribute to the design and deployment of such a CCHP system, and the developed models and analysis framework can be extended to different climate areas.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]   Co-gasification of coal and biomass wastes in an entrained flow gasifier: Modelling, simulation and integration opportunities [J].
Ali, Dalia A. ;
Gadalla, Mamdouh A. ;
Abdelaziz, Omar Y. ;
Hulteberg, Christian P. ;
Ashour, Fatma H. .
JOURNAL OF NATURAL GAS SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2017, 37 :126-137
[2]  
[Anonymous], GRI-Mech 3(0)
[3]  
Australian Building Codes Board, 2014, BUILD COD AUSTR CLAS
[4]   Second law analysis of various types of coal and woody biomass in Turkey [J].
Bilgen, S ;
Kaygusuz, K ;
Sari, A .
ENERGY SOURCES, 2004, 26 (11) :1083-1094
[5]  
BOARD, 2008, BROAD X NON CHILL MO
[6]   Energy, environmental and economic evaluations of a CCHP system driven by Stirling engine with helium and hydrogen as working gases [J].
Chahartaghi, Mahmood ;
Sheykhi, Mohammad .
ENERGY, 2019, 174 :1251-1266
[7]   Syngas production in downdraft biomass gasifiers and its application using internal combustion engines [J].
Daniel Martinez, Juan ;
Mahkamov, Khamid ;
Andrade, Rubenildo V. ;
Silva Lora, Electo E. .
RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2012, 38 (01) :1-9
[8]   Prediction of syngas quality for two-stage gasification of selected waste feedstocks [J].
De Filippis, P ;
Borgianni, C ;
Paolucci, M ;
Pochetti, F .
WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2004, 24 (06) :633-639
[9]   Gas cleaning for IC engine applications from fixed bed biomass gasification [J].
Hasler, P ;
Nussbaumer, T .
BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 1999, 16 (06) :385-395
[10]   Exergy analysis of synthetic natural gas production method from biomass [J].
Jurascik, Martin ;
Sues, Anna ;
Ptasinski, Krzysztof J. .
ENERGY, 2010, 35 (02) :880-888