ASVCP guidelines: allowable total error guidelines for biochemistry

被引:177
作者
Harr, Kendal E. [1 ]
Flatland, Bente [2 ]
Nabity, Mary [3 ]
Freeman, Kathleen P. [4 ]
机构
[1] URIKA LLC, Mukilteo, WA 98275 USA
[2] Univ Tennessee, Coll Vet Med, Dept Biomed & Diagnost Sci, Knoxville, TN USA
[3] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Vet Pathobiol, College Stn, TX USA
[4] IDEXX Labs, Wetherby, W Yorkshire, England
关键词
Bias; imprecision; inaccuracy; Quality Assurance; quality control material; QUALITY-CONTROL; VETERINARY; LABORATORIES;
D O I
10.1111/vcp.12101
中图分类号
S85 [动物医学(兽医学)];
学科分类号
0906 ;
摘要
As all laboratory equipment ages and contains components that may degrade with time, initial and periodically scheduled performance assessment is required to verify accurate and precise results over the life of the instrument. As veterinary patients may present to general practitioners and then to referral hospitals (both of which may each perform in-clinic laboratory analyses using different instruments), and given that general practitioners may send samples to reference laboratories, there is a need for comparability of results across instruments and methods. Allowable total error (TEa) is a simple comparative quality concept used to define acceptable analytical performance. These guidelines are recommendations for determination and interpretation of TEa for commonly measured biochemical analytes in cats, dogs, and horses for equipment commonly used in veterinary diagnostic medicine. TEa values recommended herein are aimed at all veterinary settings, both private in-clinic laboratories using point-of-care analyzers and larger reference laboratories using more complex equipment. They represent the largest TEa possible without generating laboratory variation that would impact clinical decision making. TEa can be used for (1) assessment of an individual instrument's analytical performance, which is of benefit if one uses this information during instrument selection or assessment of in-clinic instrument performance, (2) Quality Control validation, and (3) as a measure of agreement or comparability of results from different laboratories (eg, between the in-clinic analyzer and the reference laboratory). These guidelines define a straightforward approach to assessment of instrument analytical performance.
引用
收藏
页码:424 / 436
页数:13
相关论文
共 20 条
  • [1] American Society for Veterinary Clinical Pathology (ASVCP), PRINC QUAL ASS STAND
  • [2] American Society for Veterinary Clinical Pathology (ASVCP), GUID ALL TOT ERR BIO
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2004, Evaluation of Precision Performance of Quantitative Measurement Methods
  • [4] Approved Guideline
  • [5] Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI), GP27A2 CLSI
  • [6] Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI), 2012, EP31AIR CLSI
  • [7] ASVCP quality assurance guidelines: control of general analytical factors in veterinary laboratories
    Flatland, Bente
    Freeman, Kathy P.
    Friedrichs, Kristen R.
    Vap, Linda M.
    Getzy, Karen M.
    Evans, Ellen W.
    Harr, Kendal E.
    [J]. VETERINARY CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 2010, 39 (03) : 264 - 277
  • [8] Freeman KP, 1999, J AM VET MED ASSOC, V215, P928
  • [9] Method comparison in the clinical laboratory
    Jensen, Asger Lundorff
    Kjelgaard-Hansen, Mads
    [J]. VETERINARY CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 2006, 35 (03) : 276 - 286
  • [10] Current quality assurance concepts and considerations for quality control of in-clinic biochemistry testing
    Lester, Sally
    Harr, K. E.
    Rishniw, Mark
    Pion, Paul
    [J]. JAVMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN VETERINARY MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2013, 242 (02): : 182 - 190