Measuring the Importance of Decision-Making Criteria in Biofuel Production Technology Selection

被引:35
作者
Kheybari, Siamak [1 ]
Mahdi Rezaie, Fariba [1 ]
Rezaei, Jafar [2 ]
机构
[1] Ferdowsi Univ Mashhad, Dept Management, Mashhad 9177948974, Razavi Khorasan, Iran
[2] Delft Univ Technol, Fac Technol Policy & Management, NL-2628 BX Delft, Netherlands
关键词
Production; Biomass; Biofuels; Economics; Decision making; Fossil fuels; Best-worst method (BWM); biofuel production technology; biomass; renewable energy; sustainability assessment framework; RENEWABLE ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES; SUPPLIER SELECTION; LOGISTICS ISSUES; AIR-POLLUTION; BIOMASS; IRAN; SUSTAINABILITY; OPTIMIZATION; EFFICIENCY; MODEL;
D O I
10.1109/TEM.2019.2908037
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Environmental problems, combined with a finite supply of fossil fuels, have made the use of renewable energy sources necessary. Biomass is a renewable source of energy that has played a very important role in energy production in recent years. Because there are a number of technologies that can be used to convert biomass into energy, it is important to select the best option. The fact that multiple options are available that need to be evaluated based on a set of decision-making criteria makes this a multicriteria decision-making problem. This paper takes the first step in proposing an evaluation framework and identifying the importance of the relevant decision-making criteria in biofuel production technology selection. To determine the importance of the selection criteria, experts were asked to respond to an online questionnaire based on the best-worst method. The results indicate that air pollution, land use change, and human expertise are the three most important criteria for selecting the best biofuel production technology in our case country, Iran.
引用
收藏
页码:483 / 497
页数:15
相关论文
共 99 条
[81]   Assessment of building-integrated green technologies: A review and case study on applications of Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) method [J].
Si, Jin ;
Marjanovic-Halburd, Ljiljana ;
Nasiri, Fuzhan ;
Bell, Sarah .
SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY, 2016, 27 :106-115
[82]   Analysis and choice of energy generation technologies: the multiple criteria assessment on the case study of Lithuania [J].
Sliogeriene, Jurate ;
Turskis, Zenonas ;
Streimikiene, Dalia .
INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SUSTAINABLE ENERGY ENGINEERING AND APPLICATION (ICSEEA) 2012, 2013, 32 :11-20
[83]   Improving the low-temperature properties of biodiesel: Methods and consequences [J].
Smith, Paul C. ;
Ngothai, Yung ;
Nguyen, Q. Dzuy ;
O'Neill, Brian K. .
RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2010, 35 (06) :1145-1151
[84]   A comprehensive multi-criteria model to rank electric energy production technologies [J].
Stein, Eric W. .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2013, 22 :640-654
[85]   The Selection of Wagons for the Internal Transport of a Logistics Company: A Novel Approach Based on Rough BWM and Rough SAW Methods [J].
Stevic, Zeljko ;
Pamucar, Dragan ;
Zavadskas, Edmundas Kazimieras ;
Cirovic, Goran ;
Prentkovskis, Olegas .
SYMMETRY-BASEL, 2017, 9 (11)
[86]   ASSESSMENT OF ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES IN ELECTRICITY AND TRANSPORT SECTORS BASED ON CARBON INTENSITY AND COSTS [J].
Streimikiene, Dalia .
TECHNOLOGICAL AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OF ECONOMY, 2013, 19 (04) :606-620
[87]   Prioritizing sustainable electricity production technologies: MCDM approach [J].
Streimikiene, Dalia ;
Balezentis, Tomas ;
Krisciukaitiene, Irena ;
Balezentis, Alvydas .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2012, 16 (05) :3302-3311
[88]   Biofuel production from citrus wastes: A feasibility study in Iran [J].
Taghizadeh-Alisaraei, Ahmad ;
Hosseini, Seyyed Hasan ;
Ghobadian, Barat ;
Motevali, Ali .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2017, 69 :1100-1112
[89]   A marginal analysis guided technology evaluation and selection [J].
Tan, Kim Hua ;
Noble, James ;
Sato, Yuji ;
Tse, Ying Kei .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 2011, 131 (01) :15-21
[90]   The selection of key technologies by the silicon photovoltaic industry based on the Delphi method and AHP (analytic hierarchy process): Case study of China [J].
Tang, Yong ;
Sun, Honghang ;
Yao, Qiang ;
Wang, Yibo .
ENERGY, 2014, 75 :474-482