Bodystorming: effects of collaboration and familiarity on improvising contemporary dance

被引:8
作者
Stevens, Catherine J. [1 ,2 ]
Leach, James [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Western Sydney, MARCS Inst, Locked Bag 1797, Penrith, NSW 2751, Australia
[2] Univ Western Sydney, Sch Social Sci & Psychol, Penrith, NSW 2751, Australia
[3] Univ Aix Marseille, Ctr Rech & Documentat Oceanie, Maison Asie Pacifique, F-13003 Marseille, France
[4] Univ Western Australia, Dept Anthropol & Sociol, Perth, WA 6009, Australia
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
Brainstorming; Creativity; Dance; Distributed cognition; Group processes; Improvisation; Social facilitation; SOCIAL-INFLUENCE; CREATIVITY;
D O I
10.1007/s10339-015-0682-0
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
In contemporary dance, cognitive events are not necessarily restricted "to the skin or skull of an individual'' (Hutchins in Int Encycl Soc Behav Sci 2068-2072, 2001) but distributed across dancers during collaborative improvisation. There is some experimental evidence of greater output when people perform problem-solving tasks alone. However, when a task is challenging and paired participants are familiar with each other, pairwise and emergent outcomes are more plentiful than solo outcomes. We investigate these factors in the context of dance with the broad hypothesis that innovation is enhanced when dancers improvise together compared with when they improvise alone. Dancers (N = 10) in a professional company improvised for 2 min alone and then with another dancer. Dancer familiarity (familiar, unfamiliar) and task (expressive, non-expressive) were crossed (within-subjects). The improvisations were video-recorded over 2 h in the dancers' usual improvisation space. After each improvisation, the dancers: stated the number of movement ideas expressed and rated task ease, satisfaction, interest, novelty, originality and clarity. In both tasks, there was a tendency for self-report of a greater number of movement ideas expressed in familiar and unfamiliar pairs than alone. Ratings of task ease, satisfaction, interest, clarity, etc. were slightly higher in the unfamiliar pair condition. In the nonexpressive task, ratings of the task were higher in pairs (M = 3.02, SD 0.82) than in the solo (M = 2.67, SD 0.96) condition. Distributed creativity, relational cognition and social facilitation are used to interpret the results.
引用
收藏
页码:S403 / S407
页数:5
相关论文
共 18 条
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2009, P 5 INT WORKSHOP DES
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2003, Pragmatics & Cognition, DOI [10.1075/pc.11.2.06ste, DOI 10.1075/PC.11.2.06STE]
[4]   Cognitive stimulation with convergent and divergent thinking exercises in brainwriting - Incubation, sequence priming, and group context [J].
Coskun, H .
SMALL GROUP RESEARCH, 2005, 36 (04) :466-498
[5]   Identifying quality, novel, and creative ideas: Constructs and scales for idea evaluation [J].
Dean, Douglas L. ;
Hender, Jillian M. ;
Rodgers, Thomas L. ;
Santanen, Eric L. .
JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2006, 7 (10) :646-698
[6]  
Durkheim E., 1947, DIVISION LABOUR SOC
[7]  
Finke R. A., 1996, CREATIVE COGNITION T
[8]  
Forsythe W., 1999, Improvisation technologies
[9]   CREATIVITY [J].
Guilford, J. P. .
AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 1950, 5 (09) :444-454
[10]  
Hutchins Edwin., 2001, International Encyclopedia of the Social Behavioral Sciences, P2068, DOI [10.1016/B0-08-043076-7/01636-3, DOI 10.1016/B0-08-043076-7/01636-3]