An Innovative Emergy Quantification Method for Eco-economic Compensation for Agricultural Water Rights Trading

被引:17
作者
Lv, Cuimei [1 ]
Li, Huiqin [1 ]
Ling, Minhua [1 ]
Guo, Xi [1 ]
Wu, Zening [1 ]
Gu, Changkuan [2 ]
Li, Yang [2 ]
机构
[1] Zhengzhou Univ, Sch Water Conservancy Engn, Zhengzhou 450001, Henan, Peoples R China
[2] Kaifeng Hydrol & Water Resources Survey Bur, Kaifeng 475000, Henan, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Water rights trading; Ecological economic compensation; Emergy; Externality; IRRIGATION DISTRICT; MARKETS; EFFICIENCY; LESSONS; COSTS;
D O I
10.1007/s11269-020-02717-y
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Agricultural water rights trading, involving the sale of saved irrigation water to users experiencing a water shortage, has become an efficient means of improving water use efficiency and optimizing water management. However, after the amount of irrigation water is reduced, it is prone to externalities, resulting in a decline in the ecosystem service functions of water sellers and economic, social, ecological, and environmental losses. Sufficient compensation for such losses is the key to the sustainable development of water markets. Based on the emergy theory of ecological economics and externality theory, the eco-economic losses of water sellers caused by agricultural water rights trading are analysed. An innovative emergy quantification method that includes economic, social, and eco-environmental compensation is proposed. Additionally, eco-economic compensation for water rights trading in Dongyang-Yiwu, China, is quantified as a case study. The results show that eco-economic compensation has generally risen continuously, from 94 million Chinese Yuan ( yen ) in 2013 to yen 114 million in 2017. Taking 2005 as the base year, this study finds that the present value of eco-economic compensation is yen 755 million, while the actual trading price is only yen 256 million. These results indicate that the actual price does not fully reflect the economic, social, and eco-environmental losses caused by trading. The method proposed in this study can provide a reference for the reasonable quantification of the compensation of water sellers.
引用
收藏
页码:775 / 792
页数:18
相关论文
共 47 条
  • [1] The Water Markets as Effective Tools of Managing Water Shortages in an Irrigation District
    Alarcon, J.
    Juana, L.
    [J]. WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, 2016, 30 (08) : 2611 - 2625
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2013, REG EC EV WAT CONS C
  • [3] Potential gains from water rights trading in the Aral Sea Basin
    Bekchanov, Maksud
    Bhaduri, Anik
    Ringler, Claudia
    [J]. AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT, 2015, 152 : 41 - 56
  • [4] Water markets and third-party effects
    Bourgeon, Jean-Marc
    Easter, K. William
    Smith, Rodney B. W.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2008, 90 (04) : 902 - 917
  • [5] Energy quality, emergy, and transformity: H.T. Odum's contributions to quantifying and understanding systems
    Brown, MT
    Ulgiati, S
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2004, 178 (1-2) : 201 - 213
  • [6] Changes of Ecosystem Service Value in a Coastal Zone of Zhejiang Province, China, during Rapid Urbanization
    Cao, Luodan
    Li, Jialin
    Ye, Mengyao
    Pu, Ruiliang
    Liu, Yongchao
    Guo, Qiandong
    Feng, Baixiang
    Song, Xiayun
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2018, 15 (07)
  • [7] [陈菁 CHEN Jing], 2011, [水利学报, Journal of Hydraulic Engineering], V42, P750
  • [8] Water markets and trading
    Chong, Howard
    Sunding, David
    [J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENT AND RESOURCES, 2006, 31 : 239 - 264
  • [10] Dai XP, 2009, WATER SAV IRRIG, V10, P34