A systematic review of standard treatment guidelines in India

被引:4
|
作者
Koli, Paresh Girdharlal [1 ,2 ]
Kshirsagar, Nilima A. [3 ]
Shetty, Yashashri C. [1 ,2 ]
Mehta, Dhvani [4 ]
Mittal, Yashaswini [4 ]
Parmar, Urwashi [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Seth Gordhandas Sunderdas Med Coll, Dept Pharmacol & Therapeut, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
[2] King Edward Mem Hosp, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
[3] Indian Council Med Res, Natl Chair Clin Pharmacol, New Delhi, India
[4] Vidhi Ctr Legal Policy, New Delhi, India
关键词
Evidence-based guidelines; rational use of medicines; STGs therapeutic guidelines; treatment guidelines; CLINICAL-PRACTICE; CONSENSUS STATEMENT; MANAGEMENT; DIAGNOSIS; ACADEMY; LEGAL;
D O I
10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_902_17
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background & objectives: Standard treatment guidelines (STGs) are the cornerstone to therapeutics. Multiple agencies in India develop STGs. This systematic review was conducted to find out STGs available in India, evaluate if these were as per World Health Organization (WHO) recommendations for STGs and compare these with National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines. Information on legal authority and responsibility for formulating STGs was also sought. Methods: PRISMA guidelines were followed. Publications from PubMed and Google Scholar were searched for STGs using terms 'Standard Treatment Guidelines AND India'. Data from STGs were compiled in excel as per the WHO and authors' criteria for STGs and compared with NICE guidelines. Results: PubMed and Google Scholar search provided 56 publications (out of 1695 search results) mentioning 27 STGs. Google search and replies from authors led us 36 STGs, totalling to 63 STGs. No STG mentioned any specific period of revision, eight STGs were not evidence-based, 55 had some Indian references, 48 STGs were for single disease and the remaining multi-disease, three STGs did not include diagnostic criteria, 16 STGs did not give prescribing information of recommended treatment and 16 STGs provide no referral criteria for patients. Fifty live STGs did not mention level of health care. While NICE is a single legal authority in England and guidelines are as per WHO recommendations for STGs, in India although Acts and rules do not vest authority, National Health Systems Resource Center is generally designated responsible for STGs. Interpretation & conclusions: In India, although there are multiple STGs developed by various authorities and professionals for the same conditions, these fulfil WHO recommendations only partially. Authority with statutory duty collaborating with professional organizations, a standard methodology for adopting international guidelines, Indian data for evidence base, attention to local needs will help in delveloping better STGs and their acceptance.
引用
收藏
页码:715 / 729
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Clinical practice guidelines for the management of neuropathic pain: a systematic review
    Deng, Yunkun
    Luo, Lei
    Hu, Yuhuai
    Fang, Kaiyun
    Liu, Jin
    BMC ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2016, 16
  • [42] Quality of life in patients with hypoparathyroidism receiving standard treatment: an updated systematic review
    Buettner, Matthias
    Singer, Susanne
    Taylor, Katherine
    ENDOCRINE, 2024, 85 (01) : 80 - 90
  • [43] Adult female urinary incontinence guidelines: a systematic review of evaluation guidelines across clinical specialties
    Lenger, Stacy M.
    Chu, Christine M.
    Ghetti, Chiara
    Hardi, Angela C.
    Lai, H. Henry
    Pakpahan, Ratna
    Lowder, Jerry L.
    Sutcliffe, Siobhan
    INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2021, 32 (10) : 2671 - 2691
  • [44] Systematic appraisal of the guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of Hirschsprung's disease
    Gong, Yun-Ying
    Lv, Jia-Jun
    Yang, Ting
    Huang, Xing-Zong
    Zhang, Lin
    Wu, Jin-Hong
    Cen, Yun-Yun
    Sun, Da-Li
    PEDIATRIC SURGERY INTERNATIONAL, 2022, 38 (09) : 1197 - 1208
  • [45] Systematic Identification and Critical Appraisal of Pediatric COVID-19 Guidelines Applicable in India
    Singhal, Kamal Kumar
    Mathew, Joseph L.
    Dsouza, Jeanne M.
    Agrawal, Surbhi
    Kutlehrria, Ipsa
    Singh, Meenu
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 2022, 89 (07) : 706 - 713
  • [46] Diagnosis, Monitoring, and Treatment of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Systematic Review of Clinical Practice Guidelines
    Tunnicliffe, David J.
    Singh-Grewal, Davinder
    Kim, Siah
    Craig, Jonathan C.
    Tong, Allison
    ARTHRITIS CARE & RESEARCH, 2015, 67 (10) : 1440 - 1452
  • [47] Diagnosis and treatment for hyperuricemia and gout: a systematic review of clinical practice guidelines and consensus statements
    Li, Qianrui
    Li, Xiaodan
    Wang, Jing
    Liu, Hongdie
    Kwong, Joey Sum-Wing
    Chen, Hao
    Li, Ling
    Chung, Sheng-Chia
    Shah, Anoop
    Chen, Yaolong
    An, Zhenmei
    Sun, Xin
    Hemingway, Harry
    Tian, Haoming
    Li, Sheyu
    BMJ OPEN, 2019, 9 (08):
  • [48] Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy: A Systematic Review of International Clinical Practice Guidelines
    Gillon, Tessa E. R.
    Pels, Anouk
    von Dadelszen, Peter
    MacDonell, Karen
    Magee, Laura A.
    PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (12):
  • [49] Asthma diagnosis in infants and preschool children: a systematic review of clinical guidelines
    Moral, L.
    Vizmanos, G.
    Torres-Borrego, J.
    Praena-Crespo, M.
    Tortajada-Girbes, M.
    Pellegrini, F. J.
    Asensio, O.
    ALLERGOLOGIA ET IMMUNOPATHOLOGIA, 2019, 47 (02) : 107 - 121
  • [50] Guidelines for dementia or Parkinson's disease with depression or anxiety: a systematic review
    Goodarzi, Zahra
    Mele, Bria
    Guo, Selynne
    Hanson, Heather
    Jette, Nathalie
    Patten, Scott
    Pringsheim, Tamara
    Holroyd-Leduc, Jayna
    BMC NEUROLOGY, 2016, 16