A systematic review of standard treatment guidelines in India

被引:4
|
作者
Koli, Paresh Girdharlal [1 ,2 ]
Kshirsagar, Nilima A. [3 ]
Shetty, Yashashri C. [1 ,2 ]
Mehta, Dhvani [4 ]
Mittal, Yashaswini [4 ]
Parmar, Urwashi [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Seth Gordhandas Sunderdas Med Coll, Dept Pharmacol & Therapeut, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
[2] King Edward Mem Hosp, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
[3] Indian Council Med Res, Natl Chair Clin Pharmacol, New Delhi, India
[4] Vidhi Ctr Legal Policy, New Delhi, India
关键词
Evidence-based guidelines; rational use of medicines; STGs therapeutic guidelines; treatment guidelines; CLINICAL-PRACTICE; CONSENSUS STATEMENT; MANAGEMENT; DIAGNOSIS; ACADEMY; LEGAL;
D O I
10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_902_17
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background & objectives: Standard treatment guidelines (STGs) are the cornerstone to therapeutics. Multiple agencies in India develop STGs. This systematic review was conducted to find out STGs available in India, evaluate if these were as per World Health Organization (WHO) recommendations for STGs and compare these with National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines. Information on legal authority and responsibility for formulating STGs was also sought. Methods: PRISMA guidelines were followed. Publications from PubMed and Google Scholar were searched for STGs using terms 'Standard Treatment Guidelines AND India'. Data from STGs were compiled in excel as per the WHO and authors' criteria for STGs and compared with NICE guidelines. Results: PubMed and Google Scholar search provided 56 publications (out of 1695 search results) mentioning 27 STGs. Google search and replies from authors led us 36 STGs, totalling to 63 STGs. No STG mentioned any specific period of revision, eight STGs were not evidence-based, 55 had some Indian references, 48 STGs were for single disease and the remaining multi-disease, three STGs did not include diagnostic criteria, 16 STGs did not give prescribing information of recommended treatment and 16 STGs provide no referral criteria for patients. Fifty live STGs did not mention level of health care. While NICE is a single legal authority in England and guidelines are as per WHO recommendations for STGs, in India although Acts and rules do not vest authority, National Health Systems Resource Center is generally designated responsible for STGs. Interpretation & conclusions: In India, although there are multiple STGs developed by various authorities and professionals for the same conditions, these fulfil WHO recommendations only partially. Authority with statutory duty collaborating with professional organizations, a standard methodology for adopting international guidelines, Indian data for evidence base, attention to local needs will help in delveloping better STGs and their acceptance.
引用
收藏
页码:715 / 729
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Neuropathic Pain and Rehabilitation: A Systematic Review of International Guidelines
    Bernetti, Andrea
    Agostini, Francesco
    de Sire, Alessandro
    Mangone, Massimiliano
    Tognolo, Lucrezia
    Di Cesare, Annalisa
    Ruiu, Pierangela
    Paolucci, Teresa
    Invernizzi, Marco
    Paoloni, Marco
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2021, 11 (01)
  • [22] Tuberculosis in childhood: a systematic review of national and international guidelines
    Berti, Elettra
    Galli, Luisa
    Venturini, Elisabetta
    de Martini, Maurizio
    Chiappini, Elena
    BMC INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2014, 14
  • [23] Hypertension Treatment in Frail Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Appraisal of Guidelines
    Hu, Kaiyan
    Zhou, Gang
    Jiang, Mengyao
    Wei, Xiaohong
    Yu, Jing
    Liu, Li
    Wang, Zhe
    Feng, Liyuan
    Wu, Mei
    Li, Tao
    Ma, Bin
    DRUGS & AGING, 2023, 40 (10) : 881 - 893
  • [24] Standard of treatment and outcomes of adults with lupus nephritis in Africa: a systematic review
    Ameh, O. I.
    Kengne, A. P.
    Jayne, D.
    Bello, A. K.
    Hodkinson, B.
    Gcelu, A.
    Okpechi, I. G.
    LUPUS, 2016, 25 (11) : 1269 - 1277
  • [25] Recommendations on Weight Loss and Healthy Lifestyle in Prostate Cancer Clinical Guidelines: A Systematic Review
    Rivera-Izquierdo, Mario
    Martinez-Ruiz, Virginia
    Jimenez-Moleon, Jose Juan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 19 (03)
  • [26] The efficacy of standard urotherapy in the treatment of nocturnal enuresis in children: A systematic review
    Jorgensen, Cecilie Siggaard
    Kamperis, Konstantinos
    Walle, Johan Vande
    Rittig, Soren
    Raes, Ann
    Dossche, Lien
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC UROLOGY, 2023, 19 (02) : 163 - 172
  • [27] Guidelines for Medical Nutrition Therapy in Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: Systematic Review and Critical Appraisal
    Tsirou, Efrosini
    Grammatikopoulou, Maria G.
    Theodoridis, Xenophon
    Gkiouras, Konstantinos
    Petalidou, Arianna
    Taousani, Eleftheria
    Sawaki, Dimitra
    Tsapas, Apostolos
    Goulis, Dimitrios G.
    JOURNAL OF THE ACADEMY OF NUTRITION AND DIETETICS, 2019, 119 (08) : 1320 - 1339
  • [28] Content and quality of clinical practice guidelines for the management of type 2 diabetes in India: A systematic review
    Olujide, Oluwasegun P.
    Olujide, Mariama E.
    Leonardi-Bee, Jo
    Chattopadhyay, Kaushik
    ENDOCRINOLOGY DIABETES & METABOLISM, 2023, 6 (02)
  • [29] Comparing piperacillin/tazobactam to current guidelines for the treatment of open fractures: A systematic review☆
    Kholodovsky, Eric
    Luxenburg, Dylan
    Marmor, William
    Gibula, Ashleigh
    Hernandez, Giselle
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDICS, 2025, 63 : 116 - 122
  • [30] Clinical practice guidelines for the treatment of Covid-19 in Brazil: A systematic review
    Lanes, Tais Carpes
    Lima Ribeiro, Mariane Albuquerque
    de Oliveira, Daianny Seoni
    do Nascimento Junior, Marcos Gabriel
    Garcia, Filipe Reis
    Franca de Oliveira Melo, Jessyca Maria
    Baldin Tiguman, Gustavo Magno
    REVISTA CUIDARTE, 2021, 12 (02)