Lymph Node Ratio Is a Strong Prognostic Factor in Patients with Early-Stage Cervical Cancer Undergoing Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy

被引:13
|
作者
Kim, Se Ik [1 ,2 ]
Kim, Tae Hun [3 ]
Lee, Maria [1 ]
Kim, Hee Seung [1 ]
Chung, Hyun Hoon [1 ]
Lee, Taek Sang [3 ]
Jeon, Hye Won [3 ]
Kim, Jae Weon [1 ]
Park, Noh Hyun [1 ]
Song, Yong Sang [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Seoul Natl Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Coll Med, 101 Daehak Ro, Seoul 03080, South Korea
[2] Seoul Natl Univ Hosp, Biomed Res Inst, Seoul, South Korea
[3] Seoul Natl Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Seoul Metropolitan Govt, Boramae Med Ctr, Seoul, South Korea
[4] Seoul Natl Univ, Canc Res Inst, Coll Med, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
Cervical cancer; radical hysterectomy; minimally invasive surgery; laparoscopic surgery; lymph node ratio; recurrence; SURVIVAL; RADIOTHERAPY; CARCINOMA; SURGERY; IMPACT;
D O I
10.3349/ymj.2021.62.3.231
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: To determine whether the prognostic impact of lymph node ratio (LNR), defined as the ratio between the number of positive lymph nodes and removed lymph nodes, differs between open and minimally invasive surgical approaches for radical hysterectomy (RH) in node-positive, early-stage cervical cancel cancer. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively identified 2009 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage IB1-IIA2 patients who underwent primary type C RH between 2010 and 2018. Among them, only those with pathologically proven lymph node metastases who received adjuvant radiation therapy were included. The prognostic significance of LNR was investigated according to open surgery and minimally invasive surgery (MIS). Results: In total, 55 patients were included. The median LNR (%) was 9.524 (range, 2.083-62.500). Based on receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, the cut-off value for LNR (%) was determined as 8.831. Overall, patients with high LNR (>= 8.831%; n=29) showed worse disease-free survival (DFS) than those with low LNR (<8.831%, n=26) (p=0.027), whereas no difference in overall survival was observed. Multivariate analyses adjusting for clinicopathologic factors revealed that DFS was adversely affected by both MIS [adjusted hazard ratio (HR), 8.132; p=0.038] and high LNR (adjusted HR, 10.837; p=0.045). In a subgroup of open surgery cases, LNR was not associated with disease recurrence. However, in a subgroup of MIS cases, high LNR was identified as an independent poor prognostic factor for DFS (adjusted HR, 14.578; p=0.034). Conclusion: In patients with node-positive, early-stage cervical cancer, high LNR was associated with a significantly higher disease recurrence rate. This relationship was further consolidated among patients who received MIS RH.
引用
收藏
页码:231 / 239
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Survival outcomes of abdominal radical hysterectomy, laparoscopic radical hysterectomy, robot-assisted radical hysterectomy and vaginal radical hysterectomy approaches for early-stage cervical cancer: a retrospective study
    Zhang, Nina
    Jin, Xiangshu
    Yang, Wen
    Gu, Chenglei
    Li, Li'an
    Xu, Jia
    Tang, Qiting
    Fan, Wensheng
    Meng, Yuanguang
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2023, 21 (01)
  • [42] An audit of standards of radical hysterectomy in women with early-stage cervical cancer
    Aue-aungkul, A.
    Kietpeerakool, C.
    Kleebkaow, P.
    Temtanakitpaisan, A.
    Chumworathayi, B.
    Luanratanakorn, S.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF GYNAECOLOGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 39 (04) : 575 - 578
  • [43] Challenges and Controversies in the Surgical Treatment of Cervical Cancer: Open Radical Hysterectomy versus Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy
    Roeseler, Jona
    Wolff, Robert
    Bauerschlag, Dirk O.
    Maass, Nicolai
    Hillemanns, Peter
    Ferreira, Helder
    Debrouwere, Marie
    Scheibler, Fueloep
    Geiger, Friedemann
    Elessawy, Mohamed
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2021, 10 (17)
  • [44] Prognostic significance of low volume sentinel lymph node disease in early-stage cervical cancer
    Cibula, D.
    Abu-Rustum, N. R.
    Dusek, L.
    Zikan, M.
    Zaal, A.
    Sevcik, L.
    Kenter, G. G.
    Querleu, D.
    Jach, R.
    Bats, A. S.
    Dyduch, G.
    Graf, P.
    Klat, J.
    Lacheta, J.
    Meijer, C. J. L. M.
    Mery, E.
    Verheijen, R.
    Zweemer, R. P.
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2012, 124 (03) : 496 - 501
  • [45] A phase III randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic radical hysterectomy based on open state with abdominal radical hysterectomy in patients with early-stage cervical cancer
    Zhao, Xin
    Liu, Yansong
    Niu, Jumin
    Shi, Yulin
    TRIALS, 2024, 25 (01)
  • [46] The clinical and prognostic implication of deep stromal invasion in cervical cancer patients undergoing radical hysterectomy
    Zhu, Jun
    Cao, Lijie
    Wen, Hao
    Bi, Rui
    Wu, Xiaohua
    Ke, Guihao
    JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2020, 11 (24): : 7368 - 7377
  • [47] Survival after minimally invasive radical hysterectomy with protective colpotomy for early-stage cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Song, Yue-Lin
    Li, Rui-Zhe
    Feng, Bo-Jie
    Lu, Yu -Han
    Wang, Li-Fei
    Wang, Zhao-Yun
    Pei, Kai-Ge
    Sun, Li-Fei
    Li, Rui
    EJSO, 2024, 50 (04):
  • [48] Long-term oncological outcomes and recurrence patterns in early-stage cervical cancer treated with minimally invasive versus abdominal radical hysterectomy: The Norwegian Radium Hospital experience
    Sert, Bilal M.
    Kristensen, Gunnar B.
    Kleppe, Andreas
    Dorum, Anne
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2021, 162 (02) : 284 - 291
  • [49] Laparoscopic Compared With Open Radical Hysterectomy in Obese Women With Early-Stage Cervical Cancer
    Park, Jeong-Yeol
    Kim, Dae-Yeon
    Kim, Jong-Hyeok
    Kim, Yong-Man
    Kim, Young-Tak
    Nam, Joo-Hyun
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2012, 119 (06) : 1201 - 1209
  • [50] The impact of close surgical margins after radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer
    McCann, Georgia A.
    Taege, Susanne K.
    Boutsicaris, Christina E.
    Phillips, Gary S.
    Eisenhauer, Eric L.
    Fowler, Jeffrey M.
    O'Malley, David M.
    Copeland, Larry J.
    Cohn, David E.
    Salani, Ritu
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2013, 128 (01) : 44 - 48