Lymph Node Ratio Is a Strong Prognostic Factor in Patients with Early-Stage Cervical Cancer Undergoing Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy

被引:13
|
作者
Kim, Se Ik [1 ,2 ]
Kim, Tae Hun [3 ]
Lee, Maria [1 ]
Kim, Hee Seung [1 ]
Chung, Hyun Hoon [1 ]
Lee, Taek Sang [3 ]
Jeon, Hye Won [3 ]
Kim, Jae Weon [1 ]
Park, Noh Hyun [1 ]
Song, Yong Sang [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Seoul Natl Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Coll Med, 101 Daehak Ro, Seoul 03080, South Korea
[2] Seoul Natl Univ Hosp, Biomed Res Inst, Seoul, South Korea
[3] Seoul Natl Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Seoul Metropolitan Govt, Boramae Med Ctr, Seoul, South Korea
[4] Seoul Natl Univ, Canc Res Inst, Coll Med, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
Cervical cancer; radical hysterectomy; minimally invasive surgery; laparoscopic surgery; lymph node ratio; recurrence; SURVIVAL; RADIOTHERAPY; CARCINOMA; SURGERY; IMPACT;
D O I
10.3349/ymj.2021.62.3.231
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: To determine whether the prognostic impact of lymph node ratio (LNR), defined as the ratio between the number of positive lymph nodes and removed lymph nodes, differs between open and minimally invasive surgical approaches for radical hysterectomy (RH) in node-positive, early-stage cervical cancel cancer. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively identified 2009 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage IB1-IIA2 patients who underwent primary type C RH between 2010 and 2018. Among them, only those with pathologically proven lymph node metastases who received adjuvant radiation therapy were included. The prognostic significance of LNR was investigated according to open surgery and minimally invasive surgery (MIS). Results: In total, 55 patients were included. The median LNR (%) was 9.524 (range, 2.083-62.500). Based on receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, the cut-off value for LNR (%) was determined as 8.831. Overall, patients with high LNR (>= 8.831%; n=29) showed worse disease-free survival (DFS) than those with low LNR (<8.831%, n=26) (p=0.027), whereas no difference in overall survival was observed. Multivariate analyses adjusting for clinicopathologic factors revealed that DFS was adversely affected by both MIS [adjusted hazard ratio (HR), 8.132; p=0.038] and high LNR (adjusted HR, 10.837; p=0.045). In a subgroup of open surgery cases, LNR was not associated with disease recurrence. However, in a subgroup of MIS cases, high LNR was identified as an independent poor prognostic factor for DFS (adjusted HR, 14.578; p=0.034). Conclusion: In patients with node-positive, early-stage cervical cancer, high LNR was associated with a significantly higher disease recurrence rate. This relationship was further consolidated among patients who received MIS RH.
引用
收藏
页码:231 / 239
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Primary therapy for early-stage cervical cancer: radical hysterectomy vs radiation
    Bansal, Nisha
    Herzog, Thomas J.
    Shaw, Richard E.
    Burke, William M.
    Deutsch, Israel
    Wright, Jason D.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2009, 201 (05) : 485.e1 - 485.e9
  • [22] Positive pelvic lymph node on [18F]-FDG PET is a prognostic factor in early-stage high-risk cervical cancer treated by radical hysterectomy and adjuvant chemoradiotherapy
    Kim, D.
    Ki, Y.
    Kim, W.
    Park, D.
    Suh, D.
    Kim, K.
    Lee, J.
    Jeon, H.
    Nam, J.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF GYNAECOLOGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 41 (01) : 42 - 47
  • [23] Comparison of Minimally Invasive Versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer: An Updated Meta-Analysis
    Zhang, Mengting
    Dai, Wei
    Si, Yuexiu
    Shi, Yetan
    Li, Xiangyuan
    Jiang, Ke
    Shen, Jingyi
    Ying, Liying
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2022, 11
  • [24] Survival outcomes of minimally invasive versus open radical hysterectomy for low-risk, early-stage cervical cancer
    Summers, Garth
    Tierney, Brent
    Crotzer, David
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2020, 149 (03) : 380 - 381
  • [25] Further stratification of risk groups in patients with lymph node metastasis after radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer
    Park, Jeong-Yeol
    Kim, Dae-Yeon
    Kim, Jong-Hyeok
    Kim, Yong-Man
    Kim, Young-Tak
    Nam, Joo-Hyun
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2010, 117 (01) : 53 - 58
  • [26] Thirty-day Postoperative Adverse Events in Minimally Invasive versus Open Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Early-stage Cervical Cancer
    Kohut, Adrian Y.
    Kuhn, Theresa
    Conrad, Lesley B.
    Chua, Katherine Jane
    Abuelafiya, Madeline
    Gordon, Alan N.
    Flowers, Lisa
    Orfanelli, Theofano
    Blank, Stephanie
    Khanna, Namita
    JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2022, 29 (07) : 840 - 847
  • [27] Sentinel lymph node identification in patients with early stage cervical cancer undergoing radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy
    Li, B
    Zhang, WH
    Liu, L
    Wu, LY
    Zhang, R
    Li, N
    CHINESE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2004, 117 (06) : 867 - 870
  • [28] The Combination of T Stage and the Number of Pathologic Lymph Nodes Provides Better Prognostic Discrimination in Early-Stage Cervical Cancer With Lymph Node Involvement
    Bai, Yongrui
    Rong, Ling
    Hu, Bin
    Ma, Xiumei
    Wang, Jiahui
    Chen, Haiyan
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2021, 11
  • [29] Laparoscopic and robotic techniques for radical hysterectomy in patients with early-stage cervical cancer
    Ramirez, Pedro T.
    Soliman, Pamela T.
    Schmeler, Kathleen M.
    dos Reis, Ricardo
    Frumovitz, Michael
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2008, 110 (03) : S21 - S24
  • [30] Survival Impact of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Patients with Early-Stage Cervical Cancer
    Alonso-Espias, Maria
    Gorostidi, Mikel
    Garcia-Pineda, Virginia
    Gracia, Myriam
    Diestro, Maria Dolores
    Siegrist, Jaime
    Zapardiel, Ignacio
    Hernandez, Alicia
    REPRODUCTIVE SCIENCES, 2024, 31 (10) : 3066 - 3073