Setup errors in radiation therapy for thoracic tumor patients of different body mass index

被引:19
作者
Zhao, Jin [1 ]
Zhang, Mingyun [3 ]
Zhai, Fushan [2 ]
Wang, Haiyan [3 ]
Li, Xingde [3 ]
机构
[1] Cangzhou Cent Hosp, Dept Oncol, Cangzhou, Hebei, Peoples R China
[2] Hebei Med Univ, Hosp 3, Dept Radiat Oncol, Cangzhou, Hebei, Peoples R China
[3] Cangzhou Cent Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, Cangzhou, Hebei, Peoples R China
来源
JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS | 2018年 / 19卷 / 03期
关键词
body mass index (BMI); radiation therapy; setup errors; thoracic tumor; INTENSITY-MODULATED RADIOTHERAPY; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1002/acm2.12270
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To assess the setup errors in radiation therapy for thoracic tumors patients of different somatotypes, and to seek an individualized mathematical basis for defining the planning target volume (PTV). Methods: Sixty patients with thoracic tumors were divided into four somatotypes according to their body mass index (BMI), and their body positions were setup by two groups of technicians independently. CT simulations were performed and the reconstructed radiography was digitally generated as reference images for location verification and error measurement. By setting positioning error ranges, the within-range positioning correction rate was compared among groups. Results: Position setups for patients in the emaciated group, moderate group, and overweight group were relatively stable (with minor setup error differences between the two groups of technicians). In emaciated group, moderate group, overweight group, and obese group, setup errors in the right-left direction (R-L) were 2.2 +/- 1.3 mm, 2.2 +/- 1.6 mm, 3.9 +/- 3.1 mm, and 8.8 +/- 3.5 mm, respectively; whereas the setup errors in the four groups in the superior-inferior(S-I) direction were 2.4 +/- 1.8 mm, 2.1 +/- 1.9 mm, 3.2 +/- 2.6 mm, and 5.4 +/- 3.5 mm, and in the anterior-posterior (A-P) direction were 2.2 +/- 1.7 mm, 1.9 +/- 1.9 mm, 3.2 +/- 2.9 mm, and 6.2 +/- 4.2 mm, respectively. Moreover, in the moderate group, the positioning correction rate in the three directions (R-L, S-I, and A-P) was 20%, 9%, 8% within the error range of 5-10 mm, and 3%, 0%, 1% with a more than 10 mm error range. However, in overweight group and obese group, the positioning correction rate in these three directions (also with a more than 10 mm error range) was 23%, 27%, 19% and 21%, 16%, 23%, respectively. Conclusions: In radiation therapy for patients with thoracic tumors, the definition of PTV should be individualized. Meanwhile, with the increase in BMI, positioning correction rate has a tendency to rise too.
引用
收藏
页码:27 / 31
页数:5
相关论文
共 20 条
  • [1] Set-up verification and 2-dimensional electronic portal imaging device dosimetry during breath hold compared with free breathing in breast cancer radiation therapy
    Brouwers, Patricia J. A. M.
    Lustberg, Tim
    Borger, Jacques H.
    van Baardwijk, Angela A. W.
    Jager, Jos J.
    Murrer, Lars H. P.
    Nijsten, Sebastian M. J. J. G.
    Reymen, Bart H.
    van Loon, Judith G. M.
    Boersma, Liesbeth J.
    [J]. PRACTICAL RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2015, 5 (03) : E135 - E141
  • [2] FOK M, 1993, SURGERY, V113, P138
  • [3] Translational and rotational localization errors in cone-beam CT based image-guided lung stereotactic radiotherapy
    Garibaldi, Cristina
    Piperno, Gaia
    Ferrari, Annamaria
    Surgo, Alessia
    Muto, Matteo
    Ronchi, Sara
    Bazani, Alessia
    Pansini, Floriana
    Cremonesi, Marta
    Jereczek-Fossa, Barbara Alicja
    Orecchia, Roberto
    [J]. PHYSICA MEDICA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2016, 32 (07): : 859 - 865
  • [4] THE EFFECT OF SETUP UNCERTAINTIES ON THE TREATMENT OF NASOPHARYNX CANCER
    HUNT, MA
    KUTCHER, GJ
    BURMAN, C
    FASS, D
    HARRISON, L
    LEIBEL, S
    FUKS, Z
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1993, 27 (02): : 437 - 447
  • [5] Kilovoltage intrafraction monitoring for real-time image guided adaptive radiotherapy reduces total dose for lung SABR
    Juneja, Prabhjot
    Caillet, Vincent
    Shaw, Tom
    Martland, Judith
    Booth, Jeremy T.
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2016, 121 (01) : 15 - 18
  • [6] Kanakavelu N, 2016, J BUON, V21, P505
  • [7] Kutcher, 1995, Semin Radiat Oncol, V5, P134, DOI 10.1016/S1053-4296(95)80006-9
  • [8] Li JC, 2004, FOREIGN MED SCI ONCO, V31, P603
  • [9] [李兴德 Li Xingde], 2013, [中华放射肿瘤学杂志, Chinese Journal of Radiation Oncology], V22, P397
  • [10] Propensity Score-based Comparison of Long-term Outcomes With 3-Dimensional Conformal Radiotherapy vs Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy for Esophageal Cancer
    Lin, Steven H.
    Wang, Lu
    Myles, Bevan
    Thall, Peter F.
    Hofstetter, Wayne L.
    Swisher, Stephen G.
    Ajani, Jaffer A.
    Cox, James D.
    Komaki, Ritsuko
    Liao, Zhongxing
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2012, 84 (05): : 1078 - 1085