Using Textbook Outcomes to benchmark practice in pancreatic surgery

被引:25
作者
Nicholas, Ella [1 ]
van Roessel, Stijn [2 ]
de Burlet, Kirsten [1 ]
Hore, Todd [1 ]
Besselink, Marc G. [2 ]
Connor, Saxon [1 ]
机构
[1] Christchurch Hosp, Dept Gen Surg, 2 Riccarton Ave, Christchurch 8011, New Zealand
[2] Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Canc Ctr Amsterdam, Dept Surg, Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
Textbook Outcome; pancreatic surgery; benchmark; quality improvement;
D O I
10.1111/ans.16555
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Textbook Outcome (TO) is a novel composite measure of clinical outcomes that can be used to measure the quality of surgical outcomes. TOs for pancreatic surgery were published by the Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Group (DPCG) in 2020. The aim of this study was to explore how a medium volume hepatopancreaticobiliary unit could use TO to benchmark local outcomes following pancreatic surgery. Methods Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) or distal pancreatectomy (DP) for all indications between March 2005 and February 2020 at Christchurch Hospital (CH). Analysis of TO items as defined by the DPCG was performed and compared to nationwide Dutch outcomes (2014-2017), including cumulative analysis using CuSum. Results In total, 273 patients were included (median age 63 years; 51% female) of which 182 (67%) underwent PD and 91 (33%) underwent DP (median annual volume 12 PDs/6 DPs). Overall, 58% of patients undergoing PD and 74% of patients undergoing DP achieved TO, compared with 58% and 67%, P = 0.944 and P = 0.231, respectively, for the Netherlands (median annual volume 33 PDs/8 DPs per hospital). Conclusions TO offers a useful quality measure to benchmark local outcomes following pancreatic surgery against an external nationwide analysis. The results show that as a medium volume centre performance was comparable to previously published Dutch results, which included high volume centres. Applying CuSum methodology to the TO metric allows a continuous measure of performance. This offers the potential to provide feedback for quality improvement strategies.
引用
收藏
页码:361 / 366
页数:6
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   Centralization of Pancreatic Surgery Improves Results: Review [J].
Ahola, R. ;
Sand, J. ;
Laukkarinen, J. .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2020, 109 (01) :4-10
[2]   Pancreatic resections are not only safest but also most cost-effective when performed in a high-volume centre: A Finnish register study [J].
Ahola, R. ;
Sand, J. ;
Laukkarinen, J. .
PANCREATOLOGY, 2019, 19 (05) :769-774
[3]   Effect of hospital volume on outcome of pancreaticoduodenectomy in Italy [J].
Balzano, G. ;
Zerbi, A. ;
Capretti, G. ;
Rocchetti, S. ;
Capitanio, V. ;
Di Carlo, V. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2008, 95 (03) :357-362
[4]   The 2016 update of the International Study Group (ISGPS) definition and grading of postoperative pancreatic fistula: 11 Years After [J].
Bassi, Claudio ;
Marchegiani, Giovanni ;
Dervenis, Christos ;
Sarr, Micheal ;
Abu Hilal, Mohammad ;
Adham, Mustapha ;
Allen, Peter ;
Andersson, Roland ;
Asbun, Horacio J. ;
Besselink, Marc G. ;
Conlon, Kevin ;
Del Chiaro, Marco ;
Falconi, Massimo ;
Fernandez-Cruz, Laureano ;
Fernandez-Del Castillo, Carlos ;
Fingerhut, Abe ;
Friess, Helmut ;
Gouma, Dirk J. ;
Hackert, Thilo ;
Izbicki, Jakob ;
Lillemoe, Keith D. ;
Neoptolemos, John P. ;
Olah, Attila ;
Schulick, Richard ;
Shrikhande, Shailesh V. ;
Takada, Tadahiro ;
Takaori, Kyoichi ;
Traverso, William ;
Vollmer, Charles ;
Wolfgang, Christopher L. ;
Yeo, Charles J. ;
Salvia, Roberto ;
Buehler, Marcus .
SURGERY, 2017, 161 (03) :584-591
[5]   Assessment of Pancreatic Cancer Care in the United States Based on Formally Developed Quality Indicators [J].
Bilimoria, Karl Y. ;
Bentrem, David J. ;
Lillemoe, Keith D. ;
Talamonti, Mark S. ;
Ko, Clifford Y. .
JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2009, 101 (12) :848-859
[6]   Textbook outcome as a composite measure in oesophagogastric cancer surgery [J].
Busweiler, L. A. D. ;
Schouwenburg, M. G. ;
Henegouwen, M. I. van Berge ;
Kolfschoten, N. E. ;
de Jong, P. C. ;
Rozema, T. ;
Wijnhoven, B. P. L. ;
van Hillegersberg, R. ;
Wouters, M. W. J. M. ;
van Sandick, J. W. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2017, 104 (06) :742-750
[7]   Impact of nationwide centralization of pancreaticoduodenectomy on hospital mortality [J].
de Wilde, R. F. ;
Besselink, M. G. H. ;
van der Tweel, I. ;
de Hingh, I. H. J. T. ;
van Eijck, C. H. J. ;
Dejong, C. H. C. ;
Porte, R. J. ;
Gouma, D. J. ;
Busch, O. R. C. ;
Molenaar, I. Q. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2012, 99 (03) :404-410
[8]   Classification of surgical complications - A new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey [J].
Dindo, D ;
Demartines, N ;
Clavien, PA .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2004, 240 (02) :205-213
[9]   Is the Readmission Rate a Valid Quality Indicator? A Review of the Evidence [J].
Fischer, Claudia ;
Lingsma, Hester F. ;
Marang-van de Mheen, Perla J. ;
Kringos, Dionne S. ;
Klazinga, Niek S. ;
Steyerberg, Ewout W. .
PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (11)
[10]   Impact of centralization of pancreatic cancer surgery on resection rates and survival [J].
Gooiker, G. A. ;
Lemmens, V. E. P. P. ;
Besselink, M. G. ;
Busch, O. R. ;
Bonsing, B. A. ;
Molenaar, I. Q. ;
Tollenaar, R. A. E. M. ;
de Hingh, I. H. J. T. ;
Wouters, M. W. J. M. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2014, 101 (08) :1000-1005