Improving the accuracy of contact-type drawbead elements in panel stamping analysis

被引:9
作者
Firat, Mehmet [1 ]
Livatyali, Haydar [2 ]
Cicek, Orhan [3 ]
Onhon, M. Fatih [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sakarya, Dept Mech Engn, TR-54187 Adapazari, Turkey
[2] Istanbul Tech Univ, Fac Mech Engn, TR-80626 Istanbul, Turkey
[3] Ford Turkey, Tool & Die, Kocaeli, Turkey
来源
MATERIALS & DESIGN | 2009年 / 30卷 / 10期
关键词
Sheet metal forming; Panel stamping; FEM; Drawbead; Draw-in; Automotive steels; METAL FORMING PROCESSES; SHEET;
D O I
10.1016/j.matdes.2009.05.022
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
A finite element modeling technique is proposed to improve the accuracy of contact-type drawbead elements in panel forming analyses, and a performance assessment in terms of part border and thickness predictions is presented in conjunction with panel stamping experiments of two automotive sheets. inherent model limitations causing incorrect part geometry and thickness predictions are, firstly, evaluated considering blank deformations on a plain-strain section of a stamping die. The influence of omitted drawbead geometry and overestimated drawbead exit thickness are described analytically, and a closed form expression is obtained to correct draw-in model error. Then a sectional deformation model is used to calculate restraint force and drawbead exit thickness for a particular blank and drawbead design. The proposed technique is applied in process modeling of polygon shaped panels made of draw-quality and bake-hardenable steels. Three bead penetrations were investigated in process simulations as well as in stamping experiments. The same blankholder force was applied in all process conditions. Computed draw-in and thickness distributions were compared with on-part measurements using an experimental panel-draw die. It was determined that drawbead models based on force parameters only resulted in remarkably high thickness values at the die entry and mostly overestimated draw-in along panel border lines. An evaluation of thickness distributions computed with proposed technique showed an improved correlation with experiment results of both blank materials and confirmed the use of the drawbead exit thickness as a drawbead modeling parameter. Effects of bead penetration on panel border lines were also simulated in accord with stamping experiments. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:4003 / 4011
页数:9
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]  
CARLEER B, 1996, P 3 INT C NUM SIM 3D, P25
[2]  
Chabrand P, 1996, INT J MECH SCI, V38, P59
[3]  
CHANGMAN K, 1997, J MATER PROCESS TECH, V72, P188
[4]   Analysis of an equivalent drawbead model for the finite element simulation of a stamping process [J].
Chen, FK ;
Liu, JH .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MACHINE TOOLS & MANUFACTURE, 1997, 37 (04) :409-423
[5]   Analytical modelling of drawbeads in sheet metal forming [J].
Courvoisier, L ;
Martiny, M ;
Ferron, G .
JOURNAL OF MATERIALS PROCESSING TECHNOLOGY, 2003, 133 (03) :359-370
[6]  
*ESI GROUP, 2007, PAMSTAMP 2G US GUID
[7]   Computer aided analysis and design of sheet metal forming processes: Part III: Stamping die-face design [J].
Firat, M. .
MATERIALS & DESIGN, 2007, 28 (04) :1311-1320
[8]   An analysis of sheet drawing characteristics with drawbead elements [J].
Firat, Mehmet .
COMPUTATIONAL MATERIALS SCIENCE, 2008, 41 (03) :266-274
[9]  
GREEN DE, 2002, EXPT STUDY EFFECTS P
[10]   Expert drawbead models for finite element analysis of sheet metal forming processes [J].
Keum, YT ;
Kim, JH ;
Ghoo, BY .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOLIDS AND STRUCTURES, 2001, 38 (30-31) :5335-5353