Matching IoT Devices to the Fog Service Providers: A Mechanism Design Perspective†

被引:5
作者
Bandyopadhyay, Anjan [1 ,2 ]
Singh, Vikash Kumar [3 ]
Mukhopadhyay, Sajal [1 ]
Rai, Ujjwal [1 ]
Xhafa, Fatos [4 ]
Krause, Paul [5 ]
机构
[1] Natl Inst Technol Durgapur, Dept Comp Sci & Engn, Durgapur 713209, W Bengal, India
[2] Amity Univ, Amity Sch Engn & Technol Kolkata, Kolkata 700157, W Bengal, India
[3] VIT AP Univ, Sch Comp Sci & Engn, Amaravati 522237, Andhra Pradesh, India
[4] Univ Politecn Cataluna, Dept Comp Sci, Barcelona 08034, Spain
[5] Univ Surrey, Dept Comp Sci, Guildford GU2 7XH, Surrey, England
关键词
Fog computing; matching; mechanism design; IoT devices; truthful; Pareto optimal; truthful mechanism; ALLOCATION; STABILITY; AUCTION;
D O I
10.3390/s20236761
中图分类号
O65 [分析化学];
学科分类号
070302 ; 081704 ;
摘要
In the Internet of Things (IoT) + Fog + Cloud architecture, with the unprecedented growth of IoT devices, one of the challenging issues that needs to be tackled is to allocate Fog service providers (FSPs) to IoT devices, especially in a game-theoretic environment. Here, the issue of allocation of FSPs to the IoT devices is sifted with game-theoretic idea so that utility maximizing agents may be benign. In this scenario, we have multiple IoT devices and multiple FSPs, and the IoT devices give preference ordering over the subset of FSPs. Given such a scenario, the goal is to allocate at most one FSP to each of the IoT devices. We propose mechanisms based on the theory of mechanism design without money to allocate FSPs to the IoT devices. The proposed mechanisms have been designed in a flexible manner to address the long and short duration access of the FSPs to the IoT devices. For analytical results, we have proved the economic robustness, and probabilistic analyses have been carried out for allocation of IoT devices to the FSPs. In simulation, mechanism efficiency is laid out under different scenarios with an implementation in Python.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 32
页数:32
相关论文
共 39 条
  • [1] Fog Computing Micro Datacenter Based Dynamic Resource Estimation and Pricing Model for IoT
    Aazam, Mohammad
    Huh, Eui-Nam
    [J]. 2015 IEEE 29TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCED INFORMATION NETWORKING AND APPLICATIONS (IEEE AINA 2015), 2015, : 687 - 694
  • [2] Edge computing technologies for Internet of Things: a primer
    Ai, Yuan
    Peng, Mugen
    Zhang, Kecheng
    [J]. DIGITAL COMMUNICATIONS AND NETWORKS, 2018, 4 (02) : 77 - 86
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2007, ALGORITHMIC GAME THE
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2015, FOG COMP INT THINGS
  • [5] FoGMatch: An Intelligent Multi-Criteria IoT-Fog Scheduling Approach Using Game Theory
    Arisdakessian, Sarhad
    Wahab, Omar Abdel
    Mourad, Azzam
    Otrok, Hadi
    Kara, Nadjia
    [J]. IEEE-ACM TRANSACTIONS ON NETWORKING, 2020, 28 (04) : 1779 - 1789
  • [6] Energy-Aware Competitive Power Allocation for Heterogeneous Networks Under QoS Constraints
    Bacci, Giacomo
    Belmega, E. Veronica
    Mertikopoulos, Panayotis
    Sanguinetti, Luca
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS, 2015, 14 (09) : 4728 - 4742
  • [7] Bandyopadhyay A., 2019, LNNS, V96, p1 , DOI [10.1007/978-3-030-33509-0_31, DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-33509-0_31]
  • [8] Bandyopadhyay A, 2017, 2017 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCES IN COMPUTING, COMMUNICATIONS AND INFORMATICS (ICACCI), P1974, DOI 10.1109/ICACCI.2017.8126134
  • [9] Bandyopadhyay A, 2016, 2016 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCES IN COMPUTING, COMMUNICATIONS AND INFORMATICS (ICACCI), P2324, DOI 10.1109/ICACCI.2016.7732401
  • [10] Bokhari MU., 2018, SURVEY CLOUD COMPUTI, P149