Lessons learned from developing integrated ecosystem assessments to inform marine ecosystem-based management in the USA

被引:78
作者
Samhouri, Jameal F. [1 ]
Haupt, Alison J. [2 ]
Levin, Phillip S. [1 ]
Link, Jason S. [3 ]
Shuford, Rebecca [4 ]
机构
[1] NOAA, Conservat Biol Div, NW Fisheries Sci Ctr, Natl Marine Fisheries Serv, Seattle, WA 98112 USA
[2] NOAA, West Coast Governors Alliance, NW Fisheries Sci Ctr, Natl Marine Fisheries Serv, Seattle, WA 98112 USA
[3] NOAA, Natl Marine Fisheries Serv, Woods Hole, MA 02543 USA
[4] NOAA, Marine Ecosyst Div, Off Sci & Technol, Natl Marine Fisheries Serv, Silver Spring, MD 20910 USA
关键词
ecosystem-based management; indicator; integrated ecosystem assessment; marine policy; risk; sustainable marine management and conservation; ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS; FISHERIES MANAGEMENT; SUPPORT; SUSTAINABILITY; IMPLEMENTATION; CONSERVATION; THRESHOLDS; RECOVERY; BENEFITS; POLICIES;
D O I
10.1093/icesjms/fst141
中图分类号
S9 [水产、渔业];
学科分类号
0908 ;
摘要
Borne out of a collective movement towards ecosystem-based management (EBM), multispecies and multi-sector scientific assessments of the ocean are emerging around the world. In the USA, integrated ecosystem assessments (IEAs) were formally defined 5 years ago to serve as a scientific foundation for marine EBM. As outlined by the US National Oceanic Atmospheric Administration in 2008, an IEA is a cyclical process consisting of setting goals and targets, defining indicators, analysing status, trends, and risk, and evaluating alternative potential future management and environmental scenarios to enhance information needed for effective EBM. These steps should be hierarchical, iterative, non-prescriptive about technical implementation, and adaptable to existing information for any ecosystem. Despite these strengths and some initial successes, IEAs and EBM have yet to be fully realized in the USA. We propose eight tenets that can be adopted by scientists, policy-makers, and managers to enhance the use of IEAs in implementing EBM. These tenets include (i) engage with stakeholders, managers, and policy-makers early, often, and continually; (ii) conduct rigorous human dimensions research; (iii) recognize the importance of transparently selecting indicators; (iv) set ecosystem targets to create a system of EBM accountability; (v) establish a formal mechanism(s) for the review of IEA science; (vi) serve current management needs, but not at the expense of more integrative ocean management; (vii) provide a venue for EBM decision-making that takes full advantage of IEA products; and (viii) embrace realistic expectations about IEA science and its implementation. These tenets are framed in a way that builds on domestic and international experiences with ocean management. With patience, persistence, political will, funding, and augmented capacity, IEAs will provide a general approach for allowing progressive science to lead conventional ocean management to new waters.
引用
收藏
页码:1205 / 1215
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Ecosystem Services as a Common Language for Coastal Ecosystem-Based Management
    Granek, Elise F.
    Polasky, Stephen
    Kappel, Carrie V.
    Reed, Denise J.
    Stoms, David M.
    Koch, Evamaria W.
    Kennedy, Chris J.
    Cramer, Lori A.
    Hacker, Sally D.
    Barbier, Edward B.
    Aswani, Shankar
    Ruckelshaus, Mary
    Perillo, Gerardo M. E.
    Silliman, Brian R.
    Muthiga, Nyawira
    Bael, David
    Wolanski, Eric
    CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2010, 24 (01) : 207 - 216
  • [42] Opportunities for advancing ecosystem-based management in a rapidly changing, high latitude ecosystem
    Skern-Mauritzen, Mette
    Olsen, Erik
    Huse, Geir
    ICES JOURNAL OF MARINE SCIENCE, 2018, 75 (07) : 2425 - 2433
  • [43] Stakeholder perspectives on ecosystem-based management of the Antarctic krill fishery
    Cavanagh, Rachel D.
    Hill, Simeon L.
    Knowland, Cheryl A.
    Grant, Susie M.
    MARINE POLICY, 2016, 68 : 205 - 211
  • [44] Marine Habitat Classification for Ecosystem-Based Management: A Proposed Hierarchical Framework
    Marisa L. Guarinello
    Emily J. Shumchenia
    John W. King
    Environmental Management, 2010, 45 : 793 - 806
  • [45] An ecosystem-based approach to marine risk assessment
    Holsman, Kirstin
    Samhouri, Jameal
    Cook, Geoffrey
    Hazen, Elliott
    Olsen, Erik
    Dillard, Maria
    Kasperski, Stephen
    Gaichas, Sarah
    Kelble, Christopher R.
    Fogarty, Mike
    Andrews, Kelly
    ECOSYSTEM HEALTH AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2017, 3 (01)
  • [46] Marine Habitat Classification for Ecosystem-Based Management: A Proposed Hierarchical Framework
    Guarinello, Marisa L.
    Shumchenia, Emily J.
    King, John W.
    ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2010, 45 (04) : 793 - 806
  • [47] Marine reserves as a tool for ecosystem-based management: The potential importance of megafauna
    Hooker, SK
    Gerber, LR
    BIOSCIENCE, 2004, 54 (01) : 27 - 39
  • [48] Ecosystem-based management and the wealth of ecosystems
    Do Yun, Seong
    Hutniczak, Barbara
    Abbott, Joshua K.
    Fenichel, Eli P.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2017, 114 (25) : 6539 - 6544
  • [49] The business case for ecosystem-based management
    Link, Jason S.
    Haugen, Janne B.
    MARINE POLICY, 2025, 172
  • [50] A context for ecosystem-based fishery management: Developing concepts of ecosystems and sustainability
    Gaichas, Sarah K.
    MARINE POLICY, 2008, 32 (03) : 393 - 401