Lessons learned from developing integrated ecosystem assessments to inform marine ecosystem-based management in the USA

被引:78
作者
Samhouri, Jameal F. [1 ]
Haupt, Alison J. [2 ]
Levin, Phillip S. [1 ]
Link, Jason S. [3 ]
Shuford, Rebecca [4 ]
机构
[1] NOAA, Conservat Biol Div, NW Fisheries Sci Ctr, Natl Marine Fisheries Serv, Seattle, WA 98112 USA
[2] NOAA, West Coast Governors Alliance, NW Fisheries Sci Ctr, Natl Marine Fisheries Serv, Seattle, WA 98112 USA
[3] NOAA, Natl Marine Fisheries Serv, Woods Hole, MA 02543 USA
[4] NOAA, Marine Ecosyst Div, Off Sci & Technol, Natl Marine Fisheries Serv, Silver Spring, MD 20910 USA
关键词
ecosystem-based management; indicator; integrated ecosystem assessment; marine policy; risk; sustainable marine management and conservation; ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS; FISHERIES MANAGEMENT; SUPPORT; SUSTAINABILITY; IMPLEMENTATION; CONSERVATION; THRESHOLDS; RECOVERY; BENEFITS; POLICIES;
D O I
10.1093/icesjms/fst141
中图分类号
S9 [水产、渔业];
学科分类号
0908 ;
摘要
Borne out of a collective movement towards ecosystem-based management (EBM), multispecies and multi-sector scientific assessments of the ocean are emerging around the world. In the USA, integrated ecosystem assessments (IEAs) were formally defined 5 years ago to serve as a scientific foundation for marine EBM. As outlined by the US National Oceanic Atmospheric Administration in 2008, an IEA is a cyclical process consisting of setting goals and targets, defining indicators, analysing status, trends, and risk, and evaluating alternative potential future management and environmental scenarios to enhance information needed for effective EBM. These steps should be hierarchical, iterative, non-prescriptive about technical implementation, and adaptable to existing information for any ecosystem. Despite these strengths and some initial successes, IEAs and EBM have yet to be fully realized in the USA. We propose eight tenets that can be adopted by scientists, policy-makers, and managers to enhance the use of IEAs in implementing EBM. These tenets include (i) engage with stakeholders, managers, and policy-makers early, often, and continually; (ii) conduct rigorous human dimensions research; (iii) recognize the importance of transparently selecting indicators; (iv) set ecosystem targets to create a system of EBM accountability; (v) establish a formal mechanism(s) for the review of IEA science; (vi) serve current management needs, but not at the expense of more integrative ocean management; (vii) provide a venue for EBM decision-making that takes full advantage of IEA products; and (viii) embrace realistic expectations about IEA science and its implementation. These tenets are framed in a way that builds on domestic and international experiences with ocean management. With patience, persistence, political will, funding, and augmented capacity, IEAs will provide a general approach for allowing progressive science to lead conventional ocean management to new waters.
引用
收藏
页码:1205 / 1215
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Network Governance from the top - The case of ecosystem-based coastal and marine management
    Sandstrom, Annica
    Bodin, Orjan
    Crona, Beatrice
    MARINE POLICY, 2015, 55 : 57 - 63
  • [32] Advancing Marine Policy Toward Ecosystem-Based Management by Eliciting Public Preferences
    Chhun, Sophal
    Kahui, Viktoria
    Moller, Henrik
    Thorsnes, Paul
    MARINE RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2015, 30 (03) : 261 - 275
  • [33] The human side of marine ecosystem-based management (EBM): `Sectoral interplay' as a challenge to implementing EBM
    Alexander, K. A.
    Haward, M.
    MARINE POLICY, 2019, 101 : 33 - 38
  • [34] Making ecosystem-based management operational: Integrated monitoring in Norway
    Knol M.
    Maritime Studies, 12 (1) : 1 - 17
  • [35] Implementing "the IEA": using integrated ecosystem assessment frameworks, programs, and applications in support of operationalizing ecosystem-based management
    Harvey, Chris J.
    Kelble, Christopher R.
    Schwing, Franklin B.
    ICES JOURNAL OF MARINE SCIENCE, 2017, 74 (01) : 398 - 405
  • [36] Essential ecological insights for marine ecosystem-based management and marine spatial planning
    Crowder, Larry
    Norse, Elliott
    MARINE POLICY, 2008, 32 (05) : 772 - 778
  • [37] Implementing ecosystem-based management: evolution or revolution?
    Berkes, Fikret
    FISH AND FISHERIES, 2012, 13 (04) : 465 - 476
  • [38] A proposed ecosystem-based management system for marine waters: linking the theory of environmental policy to the practice of environmental management
    Sarda, Rafael
    O'Higgins, Tim
    Cormier, Roland
    Diedrich, Amy
    Tintore, Joaquin
    ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2014, 19 (04):
  • [39] Implementing ecosystem-based fisheries management: from single-species to integrated ecosystem assessment and advice for Baltic Sea fish stocks
    Moellmann, Christian
    Lindegren, Martin
    Blenckner, Thorsten
    Bergstrom, Lena
    Casini, Michele
    Diekmann, Rabea
    Flinkman, Juha
    Muller-Karulis, Barbel
    Neuenfeldt, Stefan
    Schmidt, Joern O.
    Tomczak, Maciej
    Voss, Ruediger
    Gardmark, Anna
    ICES JOURNAL OF MARINE SCIENCE, 2014, 71 (05) : 1187 - 1197
  • [40] Ocean Ecosystem-Based Management Mandates and Implementation in the North Atlantic
    Rudd, Murray A.
    Dickey-Collas, Mark
    Ferretti, Johanna
    Johannesen, Ellen
    Macdonald, Nicol M.
    McLaughlin, Richard
    Rae, Margaret
    Thiele, Torsten
    Link, Jason S.
    FRONTIERS IN MARINE SCIENCE, 2018, 5