Strategic Charitable Giving and R&D Innovation of High-Tech Enterprises: A Dynamic Perspective Based on the Corporate Life Cycle

被引:2
作者
Lu, Zhengwen [1 ]
Zhang, Yujie [1 ]
Li, Yuanxu [2 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Inst Technol, Sch Econ & Management, Shanghai 200235, Peoples R China
[2] Fudan Univ, Sch Management, Shanghai 200433, Peoples R China
关键词
charitable donation; R&D innovation; corporate life cycle; high-tech enterprises; SOCIAL-RESPONSIBILITY; PHILANTHROPY EVIDENCE; PERFORMANCE; FIRMS; INVESTMENT; MANAGEMENT; PRIVATE; ROLES;
D O I
10.3390/su142316180
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
As important components of differentiation strategy, charitable giving and R&D innovation can have a profound impact on the survival and growth of high-tech enterprises. However, the strategic interaction between them has not been studied in depth using the whole-life-cycle perspective. With Chinese A-share-listed high-tech enterprises in the 2015-2020 period as the research sample, the Tobit model was used to empirically test the interaction between charitable giving and R&D innovation and analyze differences in their utility over different life cycles. The results show that there was a strategic synergy between charitable giving and R&D innovation and charitable giving could significantly improve R&D innovation, but its utility was affected by changes in the life cycle of firms. Among them, the synergy utility was highest for maturing firms, followed by declining firms, but not significant for growing firms. A further study on the synergistic utility of mature firms found that, for non-state firms where executives have an R&D background, charitable giving could promote integration of external advantageous resources and R&D innovation development. Finally, the regression findings remained significant after accounting for possible endogeneity and heteroskedasticity between charitable giving and R&D innovation.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 62 条
[11]   Do financial constraints matter when firms engage in CSR? [J].
Chan, Chia-Ying ;
Chou, De-Wai ;
Lo, Huai-Chun .
NORTH AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS AND FINANCE, 2017, 39 :241-259
[12]  
Chen H., 2019, NANKAI BUS REV NT, V22, P187
[13]   Do Corporate Social Responsibility Categories Distinctly Influence Innovation? A Resource-Based Theory Perspective [J].
Chen, Suyun ;
Ji, Yu .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (06)
[14]   CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY AND ACCESS TO FINANCE [J].
Cheng, Beiting ;
Ioannou, Ioannis ;
Serafeim, George .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2014, 35 (01) :1-23
[15]   Innovation and firm growth: Does firm age play a role? [J].
Coad, Alex ;
Segarra, Agusti ;
Teruel, Mercedes .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2016, 45 (02) :387-400
[16]   Sincerity in Corporate Philanthropy, Stakeholder Perceptions and Firm Value [J].
Cuypers, Ilya R. P. ;
Koh, Ping-Sheng ;
Wang, Heli .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 2016, 27 (01) :173-188
[17]   Cash Flow Patterns as a Proxy for Firm Life Cycle [J].
Dickinson, Victoria .
ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 2011, 86 (06) :1969-1994
[18]   What Motivates Managers to Pursue Corporate Responsibility? A Survey among Key Stakeholders [J].
Ditlev-Simonsen, Caroline D. ;
Midttun, Atle .
CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY AND ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2011, 18 (01) :25-38
[19]   Investment and financing decisions of private and public firms [J].
Drobetz, Wolfgang ;
Janzen, Malte ;
Meier, Iwan .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS FINANCE & ACCOUNTING, 2019, 46 (1-2) :225-262
[20]   Political connections and the process of going public: Evidence from China [J].
Francis, Bill B. ;
Hasan, Iftekhar ;
Sun, Xian .
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL MONEY AND FINANCE, 2009, 28 (04) :696-719