Anchors Aweigh: The Impact of Overlearning on Entrenchment Effects in Statistical Learning

被引:35
作者
Bulgarelli, Federica [1 ,2 ]
Weiss, Daniel J. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Penn State Univ, Dept Psychol, 107 Moore Bldg, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
[2] Penn State Univ, Program Linguist, 107 Moore Bldg, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会; 美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
statistical learning; primacy effect; overlearning; multiple representations; anchoring; entrenchment; COGNITIVE CONTROL; DISTRIBUTIONAL INFORMATION; PROACTIVE-INHIBITION; SPEECH SEGMENTATION; WORD SEGMENTATION; WHITE-RAT; DISCRIMINATION; LANGUAGE; PRIMACY; INFANTS;
D O I
10.1037/xlm0000263
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Previous research has revealed that when learners encounter multiple artificial languages in succession only the first is learned, unless there are contextual cues correlating with the change in structure or if exposure to the second language is protracted. These experiments provided a fixed amount of exposure irrespective of when learning occurred. Here, the authors presented learners with 2 consecutive artificial languages testing learning after each minute of familiarization. In Experiment 1, learners received fixed input, and the authors replicated the primacy effect. In Experiment 2, learners advanced to the second language immediately following robust learning of the first language (thereby limiting additional exposure past the point of learning). Remarkably, learners tended to acquire and retain both languages, although contextual cues did not boost performance further. Notably, there was no correlation between performance on this task and a flanker task that measured inhibitory control. Overall, the findings suggest that anchoring effects in statistical learning may be because of overlearning. We speculate that learners may reduce their attention to the input once they achieve a low level of estimation uncertainty.
引用
收藏
页码:1621 / 1631
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]   ASSESSMENT OF COVARIATION BY HUMANS AND ANIMALS - THE JOINT INFLUENCE OF PRIOR EXPECTATIONS AND CURRENT SITUATIONAL INFORMATION [J].
ALLOY, LB ;
TABACHNIK, N .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1984, 91 (01) :112-149
[2]   Infant Learning: Historical, Conceptual, and Methodological Challenges [J].
Aslin, Richard N. .
INFANCY, 2014, 19 (01) :2-27
[3]   PROACTIVE INHIBITION AND ASSOCIATIVE FACILITATION AS AFFECTED BY DEGREE OF PRIOR LEARNING [J].
ATWATER, SK .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1953, 46 (06) :400-404
[4]   Learning the value of information in an uncertain world [J].
Behrens, Timothy E. J. ;
Woolrich, Mark W. ;
Walton, Mark E. ;
Rushworth, Matthew F. S. .
NATURE NEUROSCIENCE, 2007, 10 (09) :1214-1221
[5]  
Bjork EL., 2011, Psychology and the Real World: Essays Illustrating Fundamental Contributions to Society, P56
[6]  
Bjork RA., 1994, Metacognition: Knowing about knowing, P185, DOI DOI 10.7551/MITPRESS/4561.003.0011
[7]   Immature frontal lobe contributions to cognitive control in children: Evidence from fMRI [J].
Bunge, SA ;
Dudukovic, NM ;
Thomason, ME ;
Vaidya, CJ ;
Gabrieli, JDE .
NEURON, 2002, 33 (02) :301-311
[8]   Age Differences in Visual Statistical Learning [J].
Campbell, Karen L. ;
Zimerman, Shira ;
Healey, M. Karl ;
Lee, Michelle M. S. ;
Hasher, Lynn .
PSYCHOLOGY AND AGING, 2012, 27 (03) :650-656
[9]   Primacy in causal strength judgments: The effect of initial evidence for generative versus inhibitory relationships [J].
Dennis, MJ ;
Ahn, WK .
MEMORY & COGNITION, 2001, 29 (01) :152-164
[10]   ONE-TRIAL DISCRIMINATION REVERSAL IN THE WHITE RAT [J].
DUFORT, RH ;
GUTTMAN, N ;
KIMBLE, GA .
JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE AND PHYSIOLOGICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1954, 47 (03) :248-249