Utilization of Spinal Cord Stimulation in Patients With Failed Back Surgery Syndrome

被引:38
作者
Lad, Shivanand P. [1 ]
Babu, Ranjith [1 ]
Bagley, Jacob H. [1 ]
Choi, Jonathan [1 ]
Bagley, Carlos A. [1 ]
Huh, Billy K. [1 ]
Ugiliweneza, Beatrice [2 ]
Patil, Chirag G. [3 ]
Boakye, Maxwell [2 ]
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Div Neurosurg, Durham, NC 27710 USA
[2] Univ Louisville, Dept Neurosurg, Louisville, KY 40292 USA
[3] Cedars Sinai Med Ctr, Dept Neurosurg, Los Angeles, CA 90048 USA
关键词
complications; failed back surgery syndrome; health care cost; lumbar reoperation; spinal cord stimulation; CONVENTIONAL MEDICAL-MANAGEMENT; 5-YEAR FOLLOW-UP; COST-EFFECTIVENESS; NEUROPATHIC PAIN; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1097/BRS.0000000000000320
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design. Retrospective analysis of a population-based insurance claims data set. Objective. To evaluate the use of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) and lumbar reoperation for the treatment of failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS), and examine their associated complications and health care costs. Summary of Background Data. FBSS is a major source of chronic neuropathic pain and affects up to 40% of patients who undergo lumbosacral spine surgery for back pain. Thus far, few economic analyses have been performed comparing the various treatments for FBSS, with these studies involving small sample sizes. In addition, the nationwide practices in the use of SCS for FBSS are unknown. Methods. The MarketScan data set was used to analyze patients with FBSS who underwent SCS or spinal reoperation between 2000 and 2009. Propensity score methods were used to match patients who underwent SCS with those who underwent lumbar reoperation to examine health care resource utilization. Postoperative complications were analyzed with multivariate logistic regression. Health care use was analyzed using negative binomial and general linear models. Results. The study cohort included 16,455 patients with FBSS, with 395 undergoing SCS implantation (2.4%). Complication rates at 90 days were significantly lower for SCS than spinal reoperation (P < 0.0001). Also in the matched cohort, hospital stay (P < 0.0001) and associated charges (P = 0.016) were lower for patients with SCS. However outpatient, emergency room, and medication charges were similar between the 2 groups. Overall cost totaling $82,586 at 2 years was slightly higher in the lumbar reoperation group than in the SCS group with total cost of $80,669 (P = 0.88). Conclusion. Although previous studies have demonstrated superior efficacy for the treatment of FBSS, SCS remains underused. Despite no significant decreases in overall health care cost with SCS implantation, because it is associated with decreased complications and improved outcomes, this technology warrants closer consideration for the management of chronic pain in patients with FBSS.
引用
收藏
页码:E719 / E727
页数:9
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], PAIN MED, DOI DOI 10.1046/J.1526-4637.2002.02033.X
[2]   Safety and efficacy of spinal cord stimulation for the treatment of chronic pain: a 20-year literature review [J].
Cameron, T .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 2004, 100 (03) :254-267
[3]   Effects of spinal cord stimulation on touch-evoked allodynia involve GABAergic mechanisms. An experimental study in the mononeuropathic rat [J].
Cui, JG ;
Linderoth, B ;
Meyerson, BA .
PAIN, 1996, 66 (2-3) :287-295
[4]   Effect of spinal cord stimulation on tactile hypersensitivity in mononeuropathic rats is potentiated by simultaneous GABAB and adenosine receptor activation [J].
Cui, JG ;
Meyerson, BA ;
Sollevi, A ;
Linderoth, B .
NEUROSCIENCE LETTERS, 1998, 247 (2-3) :183-186
[5]   The failed back surgery syndrome - Reasons, intraoperative findings, and long-term results: A report of 182 operative treatments [J].
Fritsch, EW ;
Heisel, J ;
Rupp, S .
SPINE, 1996, 21 (05) :626-633
[6]  
Hansen L.C., 2012, Health Research Data for the Real World: The MarketScan Databases. Truven Analytics
[7]   Costs and Cost-Effectiveness of Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS) for Failed Back Surgery Syndrome An Observational Study in a Workers' Compensation Population [J].
Hollingworth, William ;
Turner, Judith A. ;
Welton, Nicky J. ;
Comstock, Bryan A. ;
Deyo, Richard A. .
SPINE, 2011, 36 (24) :2076-2083
[8]   Treatment of chronic pain with spinal cord stimulation versus alternative therapies: Cost-effectiveness analysis [J].
Kumar, K ;
Malik, S ;
Demeria, D .
NEUROSURGERY, 2002, 51 (01) :106-115
[9]   THE EFFECTS OF SPINAL CORD STIMULATION IN NEUROPATHIC PAIN ARE SUSTAINED: A 24-MONTH FOLLOW-UP OF THE PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED MULTICENTER TRIAL OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF SPINAL CORD STIMULATION [J].
Kumar, Krishna ;
Taylor, Rod S. ;
Jacques, Line ;
Eldabe, Sam ;
Meglio, Mario ;
Molet, Joan ;
Thomson, Simon ;
O'Callaghan, Jim ;
Eisenberg, Elon ;
Milbouw, Germain ;
Buchser, Eric ;
Fortini, Gianpaolo ;
Richardson, Jonathan ;
North, Richard B. .
NEUROSURGERY, 2008, 63 (04) :762-768
[10]   Spinal cord stimulation versus conventional medical management for neuropathic pain: A multicentre randomised controlled trial in patients with failed back surgery syndrome [J].
Kumar, Krishna ;
Taylor, Rod S. ;
Jacques, Line ;
Eldabe, Sam ;
Meglio, Mario ;
Molet, Joan ;
Thomson, Simon ;
O'Callaghan, Jim ;
Eisenberg, Elon ;
Milbouw, Germain ;
Buchser, Eric ;
Fortim, Gianpaolo ;
Richardson, Jonathan ;
North, Richard B. .
PAIN, 2007, 132 (1-2) :179-188