Predictors of Lidcombe Program treatment dropout and outcome for early stuttering

被引:6
作者
Park, Veronica [1 ]
Onslow, Mark [2 ,8 ]
Lowe, Robyn [2 ,8 ]
Jones, Mark [3 ,9 ]
O'Brian, Sue [2 ,8 ]
Packman, Ann [2 ,8 ]
Menzies, Ross [2 ,8 ]
Block, Susan [4 ]
Wilson, Linda [5 ]
Harrison, Elisabeth [6 ]
Hewat, Sally [7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sydney, Fac Med & Hlth, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[2] Univ Sydney, Australian Stuttering Res Ctr, Lidcombe, NSW, Australia
[3] Univ Queensland, Sch Populat Hlth, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[4] La Trobe Univ, Sch Allied Hlth, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[5] Charles Sturt Univ, Sch Community Hlth, Albury, NSW, Australia
[6] Macquarie Univ, Dept Linguist, Macquarie Pk, NSW, Australia
[7] Univ Newcastle, Sch Humanities & Social Sci, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
[8] Univ Technol Sydney, Australian Stuttering Res Ctr, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[9] Bond Univ, Gold Coast, Australia
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
stuttering; children; outcomes; early intervention; TREATMENT TIME; CHILDREN; TRIAL; REPLICATION; LANGUAGE; DELIVERY;
D O I
10.1111/1460-6984.12586
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
Background Information is available about what predicts Lidcombe Program treatment time, but nothing is known about what predicts treatment prognosis. Aims To investigate the predictors of treatment dropout and treatment outcome for children who were treated for early stuttering with the Lidcombe Program (N = 277). Methods & Procedures A total of 32 variables were used as predictors in regression analyses of short- and medium-term Lidcombe Program outcome, an of treatment dropout. Outcomes & Results Regression analyses associated children who have better language skills and easy temperament with better treatment outcome, although only a small portion of the variance of treatment outcome was accounted for by these variables. There was an association between treatment dropout and parental scores on a personality screening tool relating to their impulsivity. Conclusions & Implications Variables identified as predictors of Lidcombe Program treatment outcome were statistically significant, but not clinically significant. They did not account for a clinically substantive portion of treatment outcomes. Findings about parental impulsivity and their relationship with intervention drop-out require replication with prospective methods and comprehensive assessment of parent psychological status. This is particularly important because parents are involved in conducting all early interventions. 1What this paper adds2 What this paper adds to existing knowledgeWhat is already known on the subject What are the potential or actual clinical implications of this work? Information is available about what predicts Lidcombe Program treatment time, but nothing is known about what predicts Lidcombe Program treatment outcome. There are predictors of Lidcombe Program treatment outcome that are statistically significant, but none are clinically significant. Clinicians can tell parents that nothing has been found that can assist with making prognostic indications about treatment outcome for their children.
引用
收藏
页码:102 / 115
页数:14
相关论文
共 51 条
  • [1] Achenbach T., 2000, MANUAL ASEBA PRESCHO
  • [2] THE DEMANDS AND CAPACITIES MODEL-I - THEORETICAL ELABORATIONS
    ADAMS, MR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FLUENCY DISORDERS, 1990, 15 (03) : 135 - 141
  • [3] American Psychiatric Association, 2013, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, V5th ed., DOI [10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596, DOI 10.1176/APPI.BOOKS.9780890425596]
  • [4] Group Lidcombe Program Treatment for Early Stuttering: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Arnott, Simone
    Onslow, Mark
    O'Brian, Sue
    Packman, Ann
    Jones, Mark
    Block, Susan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SPEECH LANGUAGE AND HEARING RESEARCH, 2014, 57 (05): : 1606 - 1618
  • [5] Bridgman K., 2011, ASIA PACIFIC J SPEEC, V14, P147, DOI DOI 10.1179/JSLH.2011.14.3.147
  • [6] Lidcombe Program Webcam Treatment for Early Stuttering: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Bridgman, Kate
    Onslow, Mark
    O'Brian, Susan
    Jones, Mark
    Block, Susan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SPEECH LANGUAGE AND HEARING RESEARCH, 2016, 59 (05): : 932 - 939
  • [7] Direct versus Indirect Treatment for Preschool Children who Stutter: The RESTART Randomized Trial
    de Sonneville-Koedoot, Caroline
    Stolk, Elly
    Rietveld, Toni
    Franken, Marie-Christine
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (07):
  • [8] Dodd B., 2002, DIAGNOSTIC EVALUATIO
  • [9] Elevated attention deficit hyperactivity disorder symptoms in children who stutter
    Druker, Kerianne
    Hennessey, Neville
    Mazzucchelli, Trevor
    Beilby, Janet
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FLUENCY DISORDERS, 2019, 59 : 80 - 90
  • [10] Imputation of missing values of tumour stage in population-based cancer registration
    Eisemann, Nora
    Waldmann, Annika
    Katalinic, Alexander
    [J]. BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2011, 11