A prospective clinical audit to evaluate postoperative quality of recovery in adults at New Somerset Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa

被引:4
作者
Ally, M. A. [1 ]
Cloete, E. [1 ]
Reed, A. R. [1 ]
机构
[1] New Somerset Hosp, Dept Anaesthesia, Cape Town, South Africa
来源
SAMJ SOUTH AFRICAN MEDICAL JOURNAL | 2020年 / 110卷 / 10期
关键词
GENERAL-ANESTHESIA; SCORE; VALIDATION; SURGERY; VERSION;
D O I
10.7196/SAMJ.2020.v110i10.14693
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background. Recent developments in perioperative medicine increasingly emphasise patient-centred approaches to quality of care metrics. To this end, the 15-item Quality of Recovery (QoR-15) scale is a well-validated and widely applied patient-centred measure of perioperative service quality. Objectives. To assess quality of recovery in a South African (SA) population by applying the QoR-15 and to identify the local contributors to poor quality of recovery. Methods. A prospective observational study was performed in all adults undergoing elective and emergency surgery during daytime hours over a 2-week period in February 2019 at New Somerset Hospital, Cape Town, SA. Patients were approached by a qualitative interviewer on day 1 post surgery for consented recruitment, collection of demographic information and application of the QoR-15 questionnaire. Results. Of 193 patients who had surgery, 154 fulfilled our criteria and completed the questionnaire. The median QoR-15 score was 123 out of 150, which is classified as 'good', although most patients (35%) fell into the 'moderate' category (90 - 121); 59% achieved the patient acceptable symptom state score (>= 118). The median scores of the most poorly reported QoR-15 items were 5 for 'moderate pain' and 6 for 'able to return to work or usual home activities'. Poor scoring was not related to anaesthetic modality (p=0.088), surgical discipline (p=0.237), timing of surgery (p=0.717) or obstetric as opposed to non-obstetric patients (p=0.472). Construct validity was supported by a negative correlation with duration of anaesthesia (rho=-0.286; p<0.001) and lack of correlation with age (rho=-0.034; p=0.674). Conclusions. We found the QoR-15 to be a valid, feasible and acceptable tool for clinical auditing of perioperative service quality in SA. The median QoR-15 score was 123, with the majority of patients reflecting a moderate QoR. We have highlighted areas with potential for improvement and provided recommendations to address these aspects.
引用
收藏
页码:1036 / 1040
页数:5
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]  
Brooke P, 1999, INT J GERIATR PSYCH, V14, P936, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1166(199911)14:11<936::AID-GPS39>3.3.CO
[2]  
2-T
[3]   Validation of the Chinese Version of the Quality of Recovery-15 Score and Its Comparison with the Post-Operative Quality Recovery Scale [J].
Bu, Xue-Shan ;
Zhang, Jing ;
Zuo, Yun-Xia .
PATIENT-PATIENT CENTERED OUTCOMES RESEARCH, 2016, 9 (03) :251-259
[4]   Effect of patient sex on general anaesthesia and recovery [J].
Buchanan, F. F. ;
Myles, P. S. ;
Cicuttini, Flavia M. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2011, 106 (06) :832-839
[5]   Measuring quality of recovery-15 after day case surgery [J].
Chazapis, M. ;
Walker, E. M. K. ;
Rooms, M. A. ;
Kamming, D. ;
Moonesinghe, S. R. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2016, 116 (02) :241-248
[6]   A comparison of patient self-administered and investigator-administered measurement of quality of recovery using the QoR-40 [J].
Gower, S. T. ;
Quigg, C. A. ;
Hunt, J. O. ;
Wallace, S. K. ;
Myles, P. S. .
ANAESTHESIA AND INTENSIVE CARE, 2006, 34 (05) :634-638
[7]   Translation and validation of the Danish version of the postoperative quality of recovery score QoR-15 [J].
Kleif, J. ;
Edwards, H. M. ;
Sort, R. ;
Vilandt, J. ;
Gogenur, I. .
ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2015, 59 (07) :912-920
[8]   Severity classification of the quality of recovery-15 scored-An observational study [J].
Kleif, Jakob ;
Gogenur, Ismail .
JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2018, 225 :101-107
[9]   Recovery and convalescence after laparoscopic surgery for appendicitis: A longitudinal cohort study [J].
Kleif, Jakob ;
Vilandt, Jesper ;
Gogenur, Ismail .
JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2016, 205 (02) :407-418
[10]   Systematic review and consensus definitions for the Standardised Endpoints in Perioperative Medicine (StEP) initiative: patient comfort [J].
Myles, P. S. ;
Boney, O. ;
Botti, M. ;
Cyna, A. M. ;
Gan, T. J. ;
Jensen, M. P. ;
Kehlet, H. ;
Kurz, A. ;
De Oliveira, G. S., Jr. ;
Peyton, P. ;
Sessler, D. I. ;
Tramer, M. R. ;
Wu, C. L. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2018, 120 (04) :705-711