Likelihood ratio sequential sampling models of recognition memory

被引:27
|
作者
Osth, Adam F. [1 ]
Dennis, Simon [2 ]
Heathcote, Andrew [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Melbourne, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[2] Univ Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia
[3] Univ Tasmania, Hobart, Tas, Australia
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
SIGNAL-DETECTION-THEORY; LIST STRENGTH PARADIGM; LEXICAL DECISION TASK; DIFFUSION-MODEL; WORD-FREQUENCY; RESPONSE-TIME; ASSOCIATIVE RECOGNITION; COGNITIVE-PROCESSES; UNEQUAL-VARIANCE; CRITERION SHIFTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.cogpsych.2016.11.007
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The mirror effect a phenomenon whereby a manipulation produces opposite effects on hit and false alarm rates is benchmark regularity of recognition memory. A likelihood ratio decision process, basing recognition on the relative likelihood that a stimulus is a target or a lure, naturally predicts the mirror effect, and so has been widely adopted in quantitative models of recognition memory. Glanzer, Hilford, and Maloney (2009) demonstrated that likelihood ratio models, assuming Gaussian memory strength, are also capable of explaining regularities observed in receiver-operating characteristics (ROCS), such as greater target than lure variance. Despite its central place in theorising about recognition memory, however, this class of models has not been tested using response time (RT) distributions. In this article, we develop a linear approximation to the likelihood ratio transformation, which we show predicts the same regularities as the exact transformation. This development enabled us to develop a tractable model of recognition-memory RT based on the diffusion decision model (DDM), with inputs (drift rates) provided by an approximate likelihood ratio transformation. We compared this "LR-DDM" to a standard DDM where all targets and lures receive their own drift rate parameters. Both were implemented as hierarchical Bayesian models and applied to four datasets. Model selection taking into account parsimony favored the LR-DDM, which requires fewer parameters than the standard DDM but still fits the data well. These results support log-likelihood based models as providing an elegant explanation of the regularities of recognition memory, not only in terms of choices made but also in terms of the times it takes to make them. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:101 / 126
页数:26
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] One mirror effect: The regularities of recognition memory
    Hilford, Andrew
    Glanzer, Murray
    Kim, Kisok
    Maloney, Laurence T.
    MEMORY & COGNITION, 2019, 47 (02) : 266 - 278
  • [42] Three regularities of recognition memory: the role of bias
    Hilford, Andrew
    Maloney, Laurence T.
    Glanzer, Murray
    Kim, Kisok
    PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2015, 22 (06) : 1646 - 1664
  • [43] RT-MPTs: Process models for response-time distributions based on multinomial processing trees with applications to recognition memory
    Klauer, Karl Christoph
    Kellen, David
    JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2018, 82 : 111 - 130
  • [44] Evaluating models of recognition memory using first- and second-choice responses
    Kellen, David
    Klauer, Karl Christoph
    JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2011, 55 (03) : 251 - 266
  • [45] Everyday Amnesia: Residual Memory for High Confidence Misses and Implications for Decision Models of Recognition
    Berry, Christopher J.
    Shanks, David R.
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 2024, 153 (07) : 1790 - 1815
  • [46] A novel approach to an old problem: Analysis of systematic errors in two models of recognition memory
    Dede, Adam J. O.
    Squire, Larry R.
    Wixted, John T.
    NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 2014, 52 : 51 - 56
  • [47] A single trial analysis of EEG in recognition memory: Tracking the neural correlates of memory strength
    Ratcliff, Roger
    Sederberg, Per B.
    Smith, Troy A.
    Childers, Russ
    NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 2016, 93 : 128 - 141
  • [48] Fundamental causes of systematic and random variability in recognition memory
    Averell, Lee
    Prince, Melissa
    Heathcote, Andrew
    JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 2016, 88 : 51 - 69
  • [49] Adaptive Decision Making in a Dynamic Environment: A Test of a Sequential Sampling Model of Relative Judgment
    Vuckovic, Anita
    Kwantes, Peter J.
    Neal, Andrew
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-APPLIED, 2013, 19 (03) : 266 - 284
  • [50] The Effects of Sleep Deprivation on Item and Associative Recognition Memory
    Ratcliff, Roger
    Van Dongen, Hans P. A.
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 2018, 44 (02) : 193 - 208