Likelihood ratio sequential sampling models of recognition memory

被引:27
|
作者
Osth, Adam F. [1 ]
Dennis, Simon [2 ]
Heathcote, Andrew [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Melbourne, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[2] Univ Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia
[3] Univ Tasmania, Hobart, Tas, Australia
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
SIGNAL-DETECTION-THEORY; LIST STRENGTH PARADIGM; LEXICAL DECISION TASK; DIFFUSION-MODEL; WORD-FREQUENCY; RESPONSE-TIME; ASSOCIATIVE RECOGNITION; COGNITIVE-PROCESSES; UNEQUAL-VARIANCE; CRITERION SHIFTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.cogpsych.2016.11.007
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The mirror effect a phenomenon whereby a manipulation produces opposite effects on hit and false alarm rates is benchmark regularity of recognition memory. A likelihood ratio decision process, basing recognition on the relative likelihood that a stimulus is a target or a lure, naturally predicts the mirror effect, and so has been widely adopted in quantitative models of recognition memory. Glanzer, Hilford, and Maloney (2009) demonstrated that likelihood ratio models, assuming Gaussian memory strength, are also capable of explaining regularities observed in receiver-operating characteristics (ROCS), such as greater target than lure variance. Despite its central place in theorising about recognition memory, however, this class of models has not been tested using response time (RT) distributions. In this article, we develop a linear approximation to the likelihood ratio transformation, which we show predicts the same regularities as the exact transformation. This development enabled us to develop a tractable model of recognition-memory RT based on the diffusion decision model (DDM), with inputs (drift rates) provided by an approximate likelihood ratio transformation. We compared this "LR-DDM" to a standard DDM where all targets and lures receive their own drift rate parameters. Both were implemented as hierarchical Bayesian models and applied to four datasets. Model selection taking into account parsimony favored the LR-DDM, which requires fewer parameters than the standard DDM but still fits the data well. These results support log-likelihood based models as providing an elegant explanation of the regularities of recognition memory, not only in terms of choices made but also in terms of the times it takes to make them. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:101 / 126
页数:26
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] How to fit models of recognition memory data using maximum likelihood
    Dunn, John C.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCH, 2010, 3 (01): : 140 - 149
  • [2] Likelihood ratio decisions in memory: Three implied regularities
    Glanzer, Murray
    Hilford, Andrew
    Maloney, Laurence T.
    PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2009, 16 (03) : 431 - 455
  • [3] Sources of Interference in Item and Associative Recognition Memory
    Osth, Adam F.
    Dennis, Simon
    PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 2015, 122 (02) : 260 - 311
  • [4] On mimicry among sequential sampling models
    Khodadadi, Arash
    Townsend, James T.
    JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2015, 68-69 : 37 - 48
  • [5] Sequential Generalized Likelihood Ratio Tests for Online Item Monitoring
    Kang, Hyeon-Ah
    PSYCHOMETRIKA, 2023, 88 (02) : 672 - 696
  • [6] Sequential Generalized Likelihood Ratio Tests for Online Item Monitoring
    Hyeon-Ah Kang
    Psychometrika, 2023, 88 : 672 - 696
  • [7] Sequential Sampling Models in Cognitive Neuroscience: Advantages, Applications, and Extensions
    Forstmann, B. U.
    Ratcliff, R.
    Wagenmakers, E. -J.
    ANNUAL REVIEW OF PSYCHOLOGY, VOL 67, 2016, 67 : 641 - 666
  • [8] Likelihood ratio decisions in memory: Three implied regularities
    Murray Glanzer
    Andrew Hilford
    Laurence T. Maloney
    Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2009, 16 : 431 - 455
  • [9] Sequential sampling models of choice: Some recent advances
    Thomas Otter
    Joe Johnson
    Jörg Rieskamp
    Greg M. Allenby
    Jeff D. Brazell
    Adele Diederich
    J. Wesley Hutchinson
    Steven MacEachern
    Shiling Ruan
    Jim Townsend
    Marketing Letters, 2008, 19 : 255 - 267
  • [10] Sequential sampling models of choice: Some recent advances
    Otter, Thomas
    Johnson, Joe
    Rieskamp, Joerg
    Allenby, Greg M.
    Brazell, Jeff D.
    Diederich, Adele
    Hutchinson, J. Wesley
    MacEachern, Steven
    Ruan, Shiling
    Townsend, Jim
    MARKETING LETTERS, 2008, 19 (3-4) : 255 - 267