The Power of a "Maverick" in Collaborative Problem Solving: An Experimental Investigation of Individual Perspective-Taking Within a Group

被引:20
作者
Hayashi, Yugo [1 ]
机构
[1] Ritsumeikan Univ, Coll Comprehens Psychol, 2-150 Iwakura Cho, Ibaraki, Osaka 5678570, Japan
关键词
Collaborative problem solving; Conflict; Perspective taking; Conversational agents; Social interaction; Human experimentation; MINORITY INFLUENCE; COGNITIVE BUSYNESS; MAJORITY; COMPREHENSION; TASK; ARGUMENTATION; CONVERSATION; EXPLANATIONS; ACQUISITION; KNOWLEDGE;
D O I
10.1111/cogs.12587
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Integrating different perspectives is a sophisticated strategy for developing constructive interactions in collaborative problem solving. However, cognitive aspects such as individuals' knowledge and bias often obscure group consensus and produce conflict. This study investigated collaborative problem solving, focusing on a group member interacting with another member having a different perspective (a "maverick"). It was predicted that mavericks might mitigate disadvantages and facilitate perspective taking during problem solving. Thus, 344 university students participated in two laboratory-based experiments by engaging in a simple rule-discovery task that raised conflicts among perspectives. They interacted with virtual partners whose conversations were controlled by multiple conversational agents. Results show that when participants interacted with a maverick during the task, they were able to take others' perspectives and integrate different perspectives to solve the problem. Moreover, when participants interacted in groups with a positive mood, groups with a maverick outperformed groups having several perspectives.
引用
收藏
页码:69 / 104
页数:36
相关论文
共 58 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1995, The nature of insight
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1991, PERSPECTIVES SOCIALL, DOI DOI 10.1037/10096-006
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1971, Statistical Principles in Experimental Design
[4]   OPINIONS AND SOCIAL PRESSURE [J].
ASCH, SE .
SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN, 1955, 193 (05) :31-35
[5]   Argumentation and Explanation in Conceptual Change: Indications From Protocol Analyses of Peer-to-Peer Dialog [J].
Asterhan, Christa S. C. ;
Schwarz, Baruch B. .
COGNITIVE SCIENCE, 2009, 33 (03) :374-400
[6]   MAJORITY AND MINORITY INFLUENCE - SOURCE-POSITION IMBALANCE AS A DETERMINANT OF MESSAGE SCRUTINY [J].
BAKER, SM ;
PETTY, RE .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1994, 67 (01) :5-19
[7]   New approaches to demystifying insight [J].
Bowden, EM ;
Jung-Beeman, M ;
Fleck, J ;
Kounios, J .
TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 2005, 9 (07) :322-328
[8]   Majority and minority influence, task representation and inductive reasoning [J].
Butera, F ;
Mugny, G ;
Legrenzi, P ;
Perez, JA .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1996, 35 :123-136
[9]   Social values and social conflict in creative problem solving and categorization [J].
Carnevale, PJ ;
Probst, TM .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1998, 74 (05) :1300-1309
[10]  
Chi MTH, 2000, ADV INSTR P, V5, P161