Risk factor screening for gestational diabetes mellitus based on the 2013 WHO criteria

被引:43
作者
Benhalima, Katrien [1 ]
Van Crombrugge, Paul [2 ]
Moyson, Carolien [1 ]
Verhaeghe, Johan [3 ]
Vandeginste, Sofie [4 ]
Verlaenen, Hilde [4 ]
Vercammen, Chris [5 ]
Maes, Toon [5 ]
Dufraimont, Els [6 ]
De Block, Christophe [7 ]
Jacquemyn, Yves [8 ]
Mekahli, Farah [9 ]
De Clippel, Katrien [10 ]
Van Den Bruel, Annick [11 ]
Loccufier, Anne [12 ]
Laenen, Annouschka [13 ]
Minschart, Caro [1 ]
Devlieger, Roland [3 ]
Mathieu, Chantal [1 ]
机构
[1] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Dept Endocrinol, Univ Hosp Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium
[2] OLV Ziekenhuis Aalst Asse Ninove, Dept Endocrinol, Aalst, Belgium
[3] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Univ Hosp Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium
[4] OLV Ziekenhuis Aalst Asse Ninove, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Aalst, Belgium
[5] Imelda Ziekenhuis, Dept Endocrinol, Bonheiden, Belgium
[6] Imelda Ziekenhuis, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Bonheiden, Belgium
[7] Antwerp Univ Hosp, Dept Endocrinol Diabetol Metab, Edegem, Belgium
[8] Antwerp Univ Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Edegem, Belgium
[9] Kliniek St Jan Brussel, Dept Endocrinol, Brussels, Belgium
[10] Kliniek St Jan Brussel, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Brussels, Belgium
[11] AZ St Jan Brugge, Dept Endocrinol, Brugge, Belgium
[12] AZ St Jan Brugge, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Brugge, Belgium
[13] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Ctr Biostat & Stat Bioinformat, Leuven, Belgium
关键词
EUROPEAN BOARD; DIAGNOSTIC-CRITERIA; WOMEN; PREGNANCY; GYNECOLOGY; OBSTETRICS; COLLEGE; PREVALENCE; COHORT; PAPER;
D O I
10.1530/EJE-19-0117
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: Since many European countries use risk factor screening for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), we aimed to determine the performance of selective screening for GDM based on the 2013 WHO criteria. Design and methods: Overall, 1811 women received universal screening with a 75 g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) with GDM in 12.5% (n = 231) women based on the 2013 WHO criteria. We retrospectively applied different European selective screening guidelines to this cohort and evaluated the performance of different clinical risk factors to screen for GDM. Results: By retrospectively applying the English, Irish, French and Dutch guidelines for selective screening, respectively 28.5% (n = 526), 49.7% (n = 916), 48.5% (n = 894) and 50.7% (n = 935) had at least one risk factor, with GDM prevalence of respectively 6.5% (n = 120), 7.9% (n = 146), 8.0% (n = 147) and 8.4% (n = 154). Using maternal age >= 30 and/or BMI >= 25 for screening, positive rate was 69.9% (n = 1288), GDM prevalence 10.2% (n = 188), sensitivity 81.4% (CI: 75.8-86.2%) and specificity 31.8% (CI: 29.5-34.1%). Adding other clinical risk factors did not improve detection. GDM women without risk factors had more neonatal hypoglycemia (14.4 vs 4.0%, P = 0.001) and labor inductions (39.7 vs 25.9%, P = 0.020) than normal-glucose tolerant women, and less cesarean sections than GDM women with risk factors (13.8 vs 31.0%, P = 0.010). Conclusions: By applying selective screening by European guidelines, about 50% of women would need an OGTT with the lowest number of missed cases (33%) by the Dutch guidelines. Screening with age >= 30 years and/or BMI >= 25, reduced the number of missed cases to 18.6% but 70% would need an OGTT.
引用
收藏
页码:353 / 363
页数:11
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]   Diagnostic criteria and classification of hyperglycaemia first detected in pregnancy: A World Health Organization Guideline [J].
Agarwal, Mukesh M. ;
Boulvain, Michel ;
Coetzee, Edward ;
Colagiuri, Stephen ;
Falavigna, Maicon ;
Hod, Moshe ;
Meltzer, Sara ;
Metzger, Boyd ;
Omori, Yasue ;
Rasa, Ingvars ;
Schmidt, Maria Ines ;
Seshiah, Veerasamy ;
Simmons, David ;
Sobngwi, Eugene ;
Torloni, Maria Regina ;
Yang, Huixia ;
Balaji, V. ;
Mendis, Shanthi P. B. ;
Roglic, Gojka ;
Merialdi, Mario ;
Betran, Ana Pilar ;
Jenum, Anne Karen ;
Lao, Terence ;
Lopez Stewart, Gloria ;
Mikhailov, Anton ;
Moses, Robert ;
Samad, Noorjahan .
DIABETES RESEARCH AND CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2014, 103 (03) :341-363
[2]  
Amer Diabet Assoc, 2011, DIABETES CARE, V34, pS11, DOI [10.2337/dc11-S011, 10.2337/dc13-S067, 10.2337/dc10-S011, 10.2337/dc13-S011, 10.2337/dc11-S062, 10.2337/dc14-S081, 10.2337/dc12-s011, 10.2337/dc10-S062, 10.2337/dc12-s064]
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2015, NICE GUIDELINE DIABE
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2000, TIJDSCHR GENEESKD, DOI DOI 10.2143/TVG.56.1.5000625
[5]  
[Anonymous], RICHTLIJN NEDERLANDS
[6]  
[Anonymous], REC PRAT CLIN DIAB G
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2010, GUID MAN PREG GEST D
[8]   Applying Current Screening Tools for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus to a European Population: Is It Time for Change? [J].
Avalos, Gloria E. ;
Owens, Lisa A. ;
Dunne, Fidelma .
DIABETES CARE, 2013, 36 (10) :3040-3044
[9]   Type 2 diabetes mellitus after gestational diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Bellamy, Leanne ;
Casas, Juan-Pablo ;
Hingorani, Aroon D. ;
Williams, David .
LANCET, 2009, 373 (9677) :1773-1779
[10]   A Modified Two-Step Screening Strategy for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Based on the 2013 WHO Criteria by Combining the Glucose Challenge Test and Clinical Risk Factors [J].
Benhalima, Katrien ;
Van Crombrugge, Paul ;
Moyson, Carolien ;
Verhaeghe, Johan ;
Vandeginste, Sofie ;
Verlaenen, Hilde ;
Vercammen, Chris ;
Maes, Toon ;
Dufraimont, Els ;
De Block, Christophe ;
Jacquemyn, Yves ;
Mekahli, Farah ;
De Clippel, Katrien ;
Van Den Bruel, Annick ;
Loccufier, Anne ;
Laenen, Annouschka ;
Minschart, Caro ;
Devlieger, Roland ;
Mathieu, Chantal .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2018, 7 (10)