Economic value of female fertility and its relationship with profit in Spanish dairy cattle

被引:96
作者
González-Recio, O [1 ]
Pérez-Cabal, MA [1 ]
Alenda, R [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Politecn Madrid, Dept Anim Prod, ETSI Agron, Madrid 28040, Spain
关键词
artificial insemination; fertility cost; profit;
D O I
10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(04)73438-4
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
A data file of 225,085 inseminations and 120,713 lactations from 63,160 Holstein cows was analyzed to obtain female fertility economic value according to number of inseminations per service period ( INS). Fertility cost (FCOST) was included in a bioeconomic model, taking into account number of doses of semen, hormonal treatments, fertility culling cost, and delayed milk and calf sales. A profit equation was elaborated to estimate fertility cost and profit according to INS. Fertility in Spanish dairy cattle has worsened >10% over the last 14 yr. Days open have increased by about 15 d, and INS has increased from 1.7 to 2.0. A quadratic relationship was found between FCOST and INS. Similar profitability was estimated for cows who needed one or 2 INS, but when >3 INS were needed, profit decreased by >$205 (US dollars)/yr per cow. Cows that needed more INS had higher milk yield per lactation, but also had a higher culling risk and lower productive life and lifetime production, therefore, lower profit. Calving interval (CI) and INS economic values were, respectively, -$4.90 and -$67.32 (US dollars)/yr per cow and per one unit of change. The economic values of productive traits were $4.04, $1.02, and $1.19 (US dollars)/yr per cow and per one unit of change for kg protein, kg fat, and days in milk, respectively. A mature body weight economic value of -$0.67 (US dollars)/yr per cow and per kg was estimated. The relative importance of fertility traits with respect to protein was 64% for CI and 24% for INS, although the CI economic value is highly influenced by phenotypic standard deviation considered.
引用
收藏
页码:3053 / 3061
页数:9
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   A summary of the reasons why farmers cull cows [J].
Bascom, SS ;
Young, AJ .
JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 1998, 81 (08) :2299-2305
[2]   DERIVATION OF ECONOMIC VALUES FOR VEAL, BEEF AND MILK-PRODUCTION TRAITS USING PROFIT EQUATIONS [J].
BEKMAN, H ;
VANARENDONK, JAM .
LIVESTOCK PRODUCTION SCIENCE, 1993, 34 (1-2) :35-56
[3]   ESTIMATION OF THE ECONOMIC VALUE OF CONCEPTION RATE IN DAIRY-CATTLE [J].
BOICHARD, D .
LIVESTOCK PRODUCTION SCIENCE, 1990, 24 (03) :187-204
[4]  
BROTHERSTONE S, 2002, 7 WORLD C GEN APPL L
[5]   ESTIMATION OF ECONOMIC VALUES FOR DAIRY-CATTLE BREEDING GOALS - BIAS DUE TO SUBOPTIMAL MANAGEMENT POLICIES [J].
DEKKERS, JCM .
LIVESTOCK PRODUCTION SCIENCE, 1991, 29 (2-3) :131-149
[6]  
Groen A. F., 1998, INTERBULL B, V17, P81
[7]   ECONOMIC VALUES IN CATTLE-BREEDING .2. INFLUENCES OF PRODUCTION CIRCUMSTANCES IN SITUATIONS WITH OUTPUT LIMITATIONS [J].
GROEN, AF .
LIVESTOCK PRODUCTION SCIENCE, 1989, 22 (01) :17-30
[8]  
GROEN AF, 1989, LIVEST PROD SCI, V22, P1, DOI 10.1016/0301-6226(89)90121-8
[9]   Economic values in dairy cattle breeding, with special reference to functional traits. Report of an EAAP working group [J].
Groen, AF ;
Steine, T ;
Colleau, JJ ;
Pedersen, J ;
Pribyl, J ;
Reinsch, N .
LIVESTOCK PRODUCTION SCIENCE, 1997, 49 (01) :1-21
[10]  
INRA, 1978, AL RUM