Predictors of glyburide failure in the treatment of gestational diabetes

被引:51
作者
Kahn, Bronwen F.
Davies, Jill K.
Lynch, Anne M.
Reynolds, Regina M.
Barbour, Linda A.
机构
[1] UCDHSC, Div Endocrinol Metab & Diabet, Dept Med, Aurora, CO USA
[2] Univ Colorado, Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Maternal Fetal Med, Denver, CO USA
[3] Univ Colorado, Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Sect Basic Reprod Sci, Denver, CO USA
[4] Univ Colorado, Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Prevent Med & Biometr, Denver, CO USA
[5] Univ Colorado, Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Pediat, Denver, CO USA
关键词
D O I
10.1097/01.AOG.0000218704.28313.36
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to identify among women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) the patient characteristics that predict treatment failure with glyburicle. METHODS: Historical cohort of 95 GDM women offered glyburide after dietary failure with defined entry criteria. RESULTS: From November 2000 to May 2005, 118 women had 124 pregnancies and were offered glyburide therapy by the 2 codirectors of our Diabetes Clinic. All but 2 women elected glyburide, and 27 pregnancies were excluded due to criteria defined a priori to the study. A cohort of 95 women with 95 pregnancies were included for analysis. Nineteen percent failed glyburide. Significant predictors of failure were maternal age (34 years compared with 29 years, P =.001), earlier diagnosis of GDM (23 weeks compared with 28 weeks, P =.002), higher gravidity (P =.01) and parity (P =.03), and a higher mean fasting blood glucose (112 compared with 100 mg/dL; P =.045) compared with those successfully treated. After adjustment in the multivariable logistic regression analysis, GDM women diagnosed at a gestational age less than 25 weeks were 8.3 times more likely to fail glyburide compared with those diagnosed after 25 weeks. Maternal and fetal outcomes were favorable with a cesarean delivery rate of 25% and macrosomia rate of 7%. CONCLUSION: Glyburide was more likely to fail in women diagnosed earlier in pregnancy, of older age and multiparity, and with higher fasting glucoses, suggesting that earlier glucose intolerance and a reduced capacity to respond to an insulin secretagogue may distinguish this group. The time for glyburide as an alternative treatment has come; however, it should be prescribed after careful consideration of these patient characteristics to minimize the likelihood of failure.
引用
收藏
页码:1303 / 1309
页数:7
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2004, Diabetes Care, V27, P88, DOI [DOI 10.2337/DIACARE.27.2007.S88, 10.2337/diacare.27.2007.S88]
[2]  
Barbour Linda A, 2003, J Obstet Gynaecol, V23, P545
[3]   Prospective observational study to establish predictors of glyburide success in women with gestational diabetes mellitus [J].
Chmait R. ;
Dinise T. ;
Moore T. .
Journal of Perinatology, 2004, 24 (10) :617-622
[4]  
Conway D L, 2004, J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med, V15, P51
[5]   Effect of treatment of gestational diabetes mellitus on pregnancy outcomes [J].
Crowther, CA ;
Hiller, JE ;
Moss, JR ;
McPhee, AJ ;
Jeffries, WS ;
Robinson, JS .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2005, 352 (24) :2477-2486
[6]   Glyburide: The new alternative for treating gestational diabetes? [J].
Durnwald, C ;
Landon, MB .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2005, 193 (01) :1-2
[7]   Management of diabetes mellitus by obstetrician-gynecologists [J].
Gabbe, SG ;
Gregory, RP ;
Power, ML ;
Williams, SB ;
Schulkin, J .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2004, 103 (06) :1229-1234
[8]   Comparison of glyburide and insulin for the management of gestational diabetes in a large managed care organization [J].
Jacobson, GF ;
Ramos, GA ;
Ching, JY ;
Kirby, RS ;
Ferrara, A ;
Field, DR .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2005, 193 (01) :118-124
[9]   Glyburide for the treatment of gestational diabetes [J].
Kremer, CI ;
Duff, P .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2004, 190 (05) :1438-1439
[10]   Insulin and glyburide therapy: Dosage, severity level of gestational diabetes, and pregnancy outcome [J].
Langer, O ;
Yogev, Y ;
Xenakis, EMJ ;
Rosenn, B .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2005, 192 (01) :134-139