How universities influence societal impact practices: Academics' sense-making of organizational impact strategies

被引:16
作者
de Jong, Stefan P. L. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Balaban, Corina [5 ]
机构
[1] Tilburg Univ, Sch Social & Behav Sci, Dept Org Studies, POB 90153, NL-5000 LE Tilburg, Netherlands
[2] Univ Chicago, Knowledge Lab, Dept Sociol, 1155 E 60th St, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[3] Stellenbosch Univ, Ctr Res Evaluat Sci & Technol CREST, Private Bag X1, ZA-7602 Stellenbosch, Western Cape, South Africa
[4] Stellenbosch Univ, DST NRF Ctr Excellence Scientometr & Sci Technol, Private Bag X1, ZA-7602 Stellenbosch, Western Cape, South Africa
[5] Univ Manchester, Alliance Manchester Business Sch, Manchester Inst Innovat Res, Booth St W, Manchester M15 6PB, Lancs, England
基金
荷兰研究理事会;
关键词
impact practices; sense-making theory; societal impact; social sciences and humanities; organizational strategy; RESEARCH EXCELLENCE FRAMEWORK; TECHNOLOGY-TRANSFER OFFICES; PRODUCTIVE INTERACTIONS; KNOWLEDGE EXCHANGE; SCIENCES; IDENTIFICATION; RESEARCHERS; PERFORMANCE; SENSEMAKING; INCENTIVES;
D O I
10.1093/scipol/scac012
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Societal impact of academic research has become a central concern of contemporary science policies. As key players in the higher education sector, universities play a crucial role in translating policy into organizational strategies, which then have the potential to shape academics' practices. This article investigates the influence that universities may have on academics' impact practices. We employ an analytical framework that combines a novel method for studying university impact strategies, sense-making theory, and insights from literature on impact. Our data consist of interviews with sixteen philosophers and anthropologists working across four universities in the Netherlands and the UK. We find that, in response to organizational goals and Human Resource Management policies, academics report changing their impact practices. We call for universities to use their influence responsibly in order to enable a broad range of impact practices.
引用
收藏
页码:609 / 620
页数:12
相关论文
共 75 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2007, POLICY PRACTICE IMPA
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1995, Sensemaking in Organizations
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2011, J LEADERSH ORG STUD
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2000, The Intellectual and Social Organization of the Sciences
[6]   Between relevance and excellence? Research impact agenda and the production of policy knowledge [J].
Bandola-Gill, Justyna .
SCIENCE AND PUBLIC POLICY, 2019, 46 (06) :895-905
[7]  
Becher T., 2001, ACAD TRIBES TERRITOR
[9]   Who matters to universities? A stakeholder perspective on humanities, arts and social sciences valorisation [J].
Benneworth, Paul ;
Jongbloed, Ben W. .
HIGHER EDUCATION, 2010, 59 (05) :567-588
[10]   Goal displacement: Assessing the motivation for organizational cheating [J].
Bohte, J ;
Meier, KJ .
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REVIEW, 2000, 60 (02) :173-182