The Relationship between Biofilm Production and Antimicrobial Resistance in Methicillin-sensitive and Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus Isolates: In vitro Evaluation

被引:0
|
作者
Dalgic, Bahise Cagla Taskin [1 ]
Yenisehirli, Gulgun [2 ]
Otlu, Baris [3 ]
Tanriverdi, Elif Seren [3 ]
Yenisehirli, Aydan [4 ]
Bulut, Yunus [2 ]
机构
[1] Turhal State Hosp, Med Microbiol Lab, Tokat, Turkey
[2] Tokat Gaziosmanpasa Univ, Dept Med Microbiol, Fac Med, Tokat, Turkey
[3] Inonu Univ, Dept Med Microbiol, Fac Med, Malatya, Turkey
[4] Tokat Gaziosmanpasa Univ, Dept Med Pharmacol, Fac Med, Tokat, Turkey
关键词
Methicillin-resistant S. aureus; methicillin-sensitive S. aureus; antimicrobial susceptibility; biofilm formation; ANTIBIOTIC-RESISTANCE; STRAINS; SUSCEPTIBILITY; VANCOMYCIN; IS256; GENES;
D O I
10.4274/mjima.galenos.2022.2021.14
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
Introduction: The biofilm formation ability plays an important role in the pathogenesis of Staphylococcus aureus infections. This study aimed to investigate the biofilm production ability of methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) and methicillin-sensitive S. aureus (MSSA) isolates and evaluate the relationship between their antimicrobial resistance profile and biofilm formation ability. Materials and Methods: A total of 50 MRSA and 50 MSSA isolates were examined. The antimicrobial susceptibility testing of isolates was performed using the disk diffusion method. The broth microdilution method was used to determine the minimum inhibitor concentrations (MICs) of vancomycin and teicoplanin. The biofilm formation ability of isolates was tested on Congo Red Agar. The presence of icaA, icaD, IS256, and eno genes was investigated by polymerase chain reaction. Results: Both MRSA and MSSA isolates were found susceptible to vancomycin, teicoplanin, chloramphenicol, and linezolid. Two MRSA and 2 MSSA isolates were determined as heterogeneous vancomycin-intermediate S. aureus. No significant difference was observed between the biofilm formation ability of MRSA and MSSA isolates. The eno and icaD genes were detected in 100% of both MSSA and MRSA isolates. The icaA gen was detected in all MRSA and 49 MSSA isolates. The IS256 was detected in 35 of the 50 MRSA isolates. None of the MSSA isolates were positive for the IS256. The amikacin, gentamicin, ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, rifampin, clindamycin, and tetracycline resistance rates in IS256-positive MRSA isolates were significantly higher than those IS256-negative MRSA isolates. The mean MIC values of vancomycin and teicoplanin in IS256-positive MRSA isolates were significantly higher than those in IS256-negative MRSA isolates. Conclusion: This study revealed that the presence of the IS256 sequence was correlated with antimicrobial resistance, especially MRSA isolates.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Evaluation of virulence potential of methicillin-sensitive and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates from a German refugee cohort
    Creutz, Ines
    Busche, Tobias
    Layer, Franziska
    Bednarz, Hanna
    Kalinowski, Jorn
    Niehaus, Karsten
    TRAVEL MEDICINE AND INFECTIOUS DISEASE, 2022, 45
  • [22] Emergence of phenotypic resistance to ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin in methicillin-resistant and methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus strains
    Limoncu, MH
    Ermertcan, S
    Çetin, CB
    Cosar, G
    Dinç, G
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS, 2003, 21 (05) : 420 - 424
  • [23] Biofilm Formation by Methicillin-Resistant and Methicillin-Sensitive Staphylococcus aureus Strains from Hospitalized Patients in Poland
    Piechota, Malgorzata
    Kot, Barbara
    Frankowska-Maciejewska, Aneta
    Gruzewska, Agata
    Wozniak-Kosek, Agnieszka
    BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2018, 2018
  • [24] METHICILLIN-SENSITIVE AND METHICILLIN-RESISTANT HOMOLOGS OF STAPHYLOCOCCUS-AUREUS OCCUR TOGETHER AMONG CLINICAL ISOLATES
    INGLIS, B
    ELADHAMI, W
    STEWART, PR
    JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 1993, 167 (02): : 323 - 328
  • [25] Evaluation of apramycin activity against methicillin-resistant, methicillin-sensitive, and vancomycin-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus clinical isolates
    Truelson, Katherine A.
    Brennan-Krohn, Thea
    Smith, Kenneth P.
    Kirby, James E.
    DIAGNOSTIC MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASE, 2018, 92 (02) : 168 - 171
  • [26] Antimicrobial resistance in methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus
    Alghamdi, Bandar Ali
    Al-Johani, Intisar
    Al-Shamrani, Jawhra M.
    Alshamrani, Hussein Musamed
    Al-Otaibi, Bandar G.
    Master, Kholod Almazmomi
    Yusof, Nik Yusnoraini
    SAUDI JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2023, 30 (04)
  • [27] CHEMOTHERAPY OF METHICILLIN-SENSITIVE AND METHICILLIN-RESISTANT STAPHYLOCOCCUS-AUREUS KERATITIS IN THE RABBIT
    CALLEGAN, MC
    HOBDEN, JA
    HILL, JM
    INSLER, MS
    OCALLAGHAN, RJ
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 1992, 33 (04) : 935 - 935
  • [28] Contamination of room door handles by methicillin-sensitive/methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus
    Oie, S
    Hosokawa, I
    Kamiya, A
    JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL INFECTION, 2002, 51 (02) : 140 - 143
  • [29] Lysostaphin is effective in treating methicillin-resistant and methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus keratitis
    Dajcs, JJ
    Hume, EBH
    Moreau, JM
    O'Callaghan, RJ
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 1999, 40 (04) : S262 - S262
  • [30] Untargeted lipidomic differences between clinical strains of methicillin-sensitive and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus
    Nikolic, Philip
    Mudgil, Poonam
    Harman, David G.
    Whitehall, John
    INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2022, 54 (07) : 497 - 507