The Relationship between Biofilm Production and Antimicrobial Resistance in Methicillin-sensitive and Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus Isolates: In vitro Evaluation

被引:0
|
作者
Dalgic, Bahise Cagla Taskin [1 ]
Yenisehirli, Gulgun [2 ]
Otlu, Baris [3 ]
Tanriverdi, Elif Seren [3 ]
Yenisehirli, Aydan [4 ]
Bulut, Yunus [2 ]
机构
[1] Turhal State Hosp, Med Microbiol Lab, Tokat, Turkey
[2] Tokat Gaziosmanpasa Univ, Dept Med Microbiol, Fac Med, Tokat, Turkey
[3] Inonu Univ, Dept Med Microbiol, Fac Med, Malatya, Turkey
[4] Tokat Gaziosmanpasa Univ, Dept Med Pharmacol, Fac Med, Tokat, Turkey
关键词
Methicillin-resistant S. aureus; methicillin-sensitive S. aureus; antimicrobial susceptibility; biofilm formation; ANTIBIOTIC-RESISTANCE; STRAINS; SUSCEPTIBILITY; VANCOMYCIN; IS256; GENES;
D O I
10.4274/mjima.galenos.2022.2021.14
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
Introduction: The biofilm formation ability plays an important role in the pathogenesis of Staphylococcus aureus infections. This study aimed to investigate the biofilm production ability of methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) and methicillin-sensitive S. aureus (MSSA) isolates and evaluate the relationship between their antimicrobial resistance profile and biofilm formation ability. Materials and Methods: A total of 50 MRSA and 50 MSSA isolates were examined. The antimicrobial susceptibility testing of isolates was performed using the disk diffusion method. The broth microdilution method was used to determine the minimum inhibitor concentrations (MICs) of vancomycin and teicoplanin. The biofilm formation ability of isolates was tested on Congo Red Agar. The presence of icaA, icaD, IS256, and eno genes was investigated by polymerase chain reaction. Results: Both MRSA and MSSA isolates were found susceptible to vancomycin, teicoplanin, chloramphenicol, and linezolid. Two MRSA and 2 MSSA isolates were determined as heterogeneous vancomycin-intermediate S. aureus. No significant difference was observed between the biofilm formation ability of MRSA and MSSA isolates. The eno and icaD genes were detected in 100% of both MSSA and MRSA isolates. The icaA gen was detected in all MRSA and 49 MSSA isolates. The IS256 was detected in 35 of the 50 MRSA isolates. None of the MSSA isolates were positive for the IS256. The amikacin, gentamicin, ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, rifampin, clindamycin, and tetracycline resistance rates in IS256-positive MRSA isolates were significantly higher than those IS256-negative MRSA isolates. The mean MIC values of vancomycin and teicoplanin in IS256-positive MRSA isolates were significantly higher than those in IS256-negative MRSA isolates. Conclusion: This study revealed that the presence of the IS256 sequence was correlated with antimicrobial resistance, especially MRSA isolates.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] In vitro evaluation of methicillin-resistant and methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus susceptibility to Saudi honeys
    Hussain, Muhammad Barkaat
    Kamel, Yasser Mahmoud
    Ullah, Zia
    Jiman-Fatani, Asif Ahmad Mohamad
    Ahmad, Ansar Shafiq
    BMC COMPLEMENTARY AND ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE, 2019, 19 (1):
  • [2] Methicillin-resistant/methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia
    Austin, TW
    Austin, MA
    Coleman, B
    SAUDI MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2003, 24 (03) : 256 - 260
  • [3] Methicillin-resistant and methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus laryngitis
    Shah, Manish D.
    Klein, Adam M.
    LARYNGOSCOPE, 2012, 122 (11): : 2497 - 2502
  • [4] In vitro evaluation of methicillin-resistant and methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus susceptibility to Saudi honeys
    Muhammad Barkaat Hussain
    Yasser Mahmoud Kamel
    Zia Ullah
    Asif Ahmad Mohamad Jiman-Fatani
    Ansar Shafiq Ahmad
    BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine, 19
  • [5] Interaction between methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA)
    Rao, GG
    Wong, J
    JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL INFECTION, 2003, 55 (02) : 116 - 118
  • [6] Evaluation of phenotypic and genotypic detection methods for biofilm-forming methicillin-sensitive and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus clinical isolates
    Salman S. Atshan
    Mariana N. Shamsudin
    Annals of Microbiology, 2011, 61 : 825 - 831
  • [7] Evaluation of phenotypic and genotypic detection methods for biofilm-forming methicillin-sensitive and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus clinical isolates
    Atshan, Salman S.
    Shamsudin, Mariana N.
    ANNALS OF MICROBIOLOGY, 2011, 61 (04) : 825 - 831
  • [8] Differentiating Between Methicillin-Resistant and Methicillin-Sensitive Staphylococcus aureus Osteomyelitis in Children
    Ju, Kevin L.
    Zurakowski, David
    Kocher, Mininder S.
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2011, 93A (18): : 1693 - 1701
  • [9] Efflux pumps and biofilm formation by both methicillin-resistant and methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus strains
    Aggarwal, Shifu
    Singh, Durg Vijai
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BIOLOGY, 2020, 58 (08) : 527 - 538
  • [10] Subinhibitory Dalbavancin Attenuates Exotoxin Production from Methicillin-Sensitive and Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus In Vitro
    Hobdey, Sarah E.
    Katahira, Eva J.
    Dockstader, Pamela
    Davidson, Stephen M.
    Bond, Laura
    Bolz, Devin D.
    Bryant, Amy E.
    Stevens, Dennis L.
    ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 2017, 61 (11)