Towards a theory of just transition: A neo-Gramscian understanding of how to shift development pathways to zero poverty and zero carbon

被引:57
作者
Winkler, Harald [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cape Town, Fac Engn & Built Environm, Private Bag UCT, ZA-7701 Rondebosch, South Africa
[2] Univ Cape Town, African Climate & Dev Initiat, Private Bag UCT, ZA-7701 Rondebosch, South Africa
关键词
Just transition; Neo-Gramscian theory; Ideology; Zero carbon; Poverty eradication; Development pathways; Inequality; GLOBAL POLITICAL-ECONOMY; SOCIAL-SCIENCE; JUSTICE; CLIMATE; TRANSFORMATION; PERSPECTIVE; ENVIRONMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.erss.2020.101789
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
As a global community, we need to understand better how a just transition can shift development paths to achieve net zero emissions and eliminate poverty. Our past development trajectories have led to high emissions, persistent inequality and a world that is fragmented across multiple contradictions. How can countries shift to development pathways that deliver zero poverty and zero carbon? In developing a theory of just transition, the article begins by reviewing a range of theoretical approaches from different traditions, building in particular on neo-Gramscian approaches. It applies and modifies core components of Gramsci's approach, building a neoGramscian theory of just transitions around concepts of ideology, hegemony, change agents and fundamental conditions. The theory suggests how coalitions of change agents can come together behind a just transition. The coalition needs to gain broader support, establish a new cultural hegemony in support of just transitions and be able to transform the fundamental conditions of the 21st century. The article briefly considers how this better understanding can be applied to the practice of shifting development pathways. The penultimate section reflects on limitations, including that a fuller development of a theory of just transition will require application for detailed concrete examples and a community effort. Together, we might address the multiple challenges of our present conditions to transition to development that enables human flourishing and a healthy planet.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 129 条
[31]  
Engestrom Y., 2007, COMMUNITIES PRACTICE
[32]  
ESRB, 2016, Report of the Advisory Scientific Committee 6
[33]   Learning from comparative public policy: a practical guide [J].
Evans, M .
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, 2006, 84 (02) :479-U4
[34]  
FAO, 2020, ADDRESSING INEQUALIT
[35]   Altruistic punishment in humans [J].
Fehr, E ;
Gächter, S .
NATURE, 2002, 415 (6868) :137-140
[36]   Capitalism in sustainability transitions research: Time for a critical turn? [J].
Feola, Giuseppe .
ENVIRONMENTAL INNOVATION AND SOCIETAL TRANSITIONS, 2020, 35 :241-250
[37]  
Francis Pope, 2015, ENCYCLICAL LETT HOLY
[38]   Ontologies, socio-technical transitions (to sustainability), and the multi-level perspective [J].
Geels, Frank W. .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2010, 39 (04) :495-510
[39]  
Global Covenant of Mayors, City journey
[40]   Just transition management: Balancing just outcomes with just processes in Australian renewable energy transitions [J].
Goddard, George ;
Farrelly, Megan A. .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2018, 225 :110-123