Measurement of patient-reported outcomes after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a systematic review

被引:11
作者
Alexander, Harry C. [1 ,2 ]
Nguyen, Cindy H. [2 ]
Moore, Matthew R. [1 ]
Bartlett, Adam S. [2 ,3 ]
Hannam, Jacqueline A. [1 ]
Poole, Garth H. [4 ]
Merry, Alan F. [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Auckland, Dept Anaesthesiol, Fac Med & Hlth Sci, Auckland, New Zealand
[2] Univ Auckland, Dept Surg, Fac Med & Hlth Sci, Auckland, New Zealand
[3] Auckland City Hosp, Dept Surg, Auckland, New Zealand
[4] Middlemore Hosp, Dept Surg, Auckland, New Zealand
[5] Auckland City Hosp, Dept Anaesthesiol, Auckland, New Zealand
来源
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES | 2019年 / 33卷 / 07期
关键词
Laparoscopic; Cholecystectomy; Outcome; Surgery; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; SINGLE-INCISION; PHYSICAL-ACTIVITY; HEALTH SURVEY; POSTOPERATIVE RECOVERY; QUESTIONNAIRE; QUALITY; SCALE; VALIDATION; VALIDITY;
D O I
10.1007/s00464-019-06745-7
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundPatient-reported outcome (PRO) measures (PROMs) are increasingly used as endpoints in surgical trials. PROs need to be consistently measured and reported to accurately evaluate surgical care. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is a commonly performed procedure which may be evaluated by PROs. We aimed to evaluate the frequency and consistency of PRO measurement and reporting after LC.MethodsMEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched for prospective studies reporting PROs of LC, between 2013 and 2016. Data on the measurement and reporting of PROs were extracted.ResultsA total of 281 studies were evaluated. Forty-five unique multi-item questionnaires were identified, most of which were used in single studies (n=35). One hundred and ten unique rating scales were used to assess 358 PROs. The visual analogue scale was used to assess 24 different PROs, 17 of which were only reported in single studies. Details about the type of rating scale used were not given for 72 scales. Three hundred and twenty-three PROs were reported in 162 studies without details given about the scale or questionnaire used to evaluate them.ConclusionsConsiderable variation was identified in the choice of PROs reported after LC, and in how they were measured. PRO measurement for LC is focused on short-term outcomes, such as post-operative pain, rather than longer-term outcomes. Consideration should be given towards the development of a core outcome set for LC which incorporates PROs.
引用
收藏
页码:2061 / 2071
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   Patient-reported outcomes, provider-reported outcomes, and physiologic parameters after gender-affirming hormone treatment in Canada: a systematic review [J].
Jackman, Liam ;
Chan, Cynthia ;
Garvilles, Micon ;
Kamran, Rakhshan .
HORMONES-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENDOCRINOLOGY AND METABOLISM, 2025,
[42]   Patient-Reported Outcomes for Quality of Life Assessment in Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review of Measurement Properties [J].
Kotecha, Dipak ;
Ahmed, Amar ;
Calvert, Melanie ;
Lencioni, Mauro ;
Terwee, Caroline B. ;
Lane, Deirdre A. .
PLOS ONE, 2016, 11 (11)
[43]   Measurement of patient-reported outcomes. 1: The search for the Holy Grail [J].
McKenna, Stephen P. ;
Heaney, Alice ;
Wilburn, Jeanette ;
Stenner, A. Jackson .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ECONOMICS, 2019, 22 (06) :516-522
[44]   Scores and sores: Exploring patient-reported outcomes for knee evaluation in orthopaedics, sports medicine and rehabilitation [J].
Krolikowska, Aleksandra ;
Reichert, Pawel ;
Senorski, Eric Hamrin ;
Karlsson, Jon ;
Becker, Roland ;
Prill, Robert .
KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2025, 33 (01) :21-28
[45]   Past and Current Practice of Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement in Randomized Cancer Clinical Trials: A Systematic Review [J].
Giesinger, Johannes M. ;
Efficace, Fabio ;
Aaronson, Neil ;
Calvert, Melanie ;
Kyte, Derek ;
Cottone, Francesco ;
Cella, David ;
Gamper, Eva-Maria .
VALUE IN HEALTH, 2021, 24 (04) :585-591
[46]   Patient-reported outcomes following lymph reconstructive surgery in lower limb lymphedema: A systematic review of literature [J].
Gruenherz, Lisanne ;
Hulla, Heike ;
Uyulmaz, Semra ;
Giovanoli, Pietro ;
Lindenblatt, Nicole .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY-VENOUS AND LYMPHATIC DISORDERS, 2021, 9 (03) :811-+
[47]   Assessing the engagement of children and families in selecting patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and developing their measures: a systematic review [J].
McNeill, Malcolm ;
Noyek, Samantha ;
Engeda, Eshetu ;
Fayed, Nora .
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2021, 30 (04) :983-995
[48]   A systematic review of patient-reported outcome measures after rhinoplasty [J].
M. Barone ;
A. Cogliandro ;
N. Di Stefano ;
V. Tambone ;
P. Persichetti .
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, 2017, 274 :1807-1811
[49]   NONMALIGNANT ORAL DISEASE-SPECIFIC DENTAL PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOME MEASURES FOR ADULT PATIENTS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW [J].
Rener-Sitar, Ksenija ;
John, Mike T. ;
Truong, V. Y. ;
Tambe, Sailee ;
Theis-Mahon, Nicole .
JOURNAL OF EVIDENCE-BASED DENTAL PRACTICE, 2021, 21 (01)
[50]   Reporting of complications after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a systematic review [J].
Alexander, Harry C. ;
Bartlett, Adam S. ;
Wells, Cameron I. ;
Hannam, Jacqueline A. ;
Moore, Matthew R. ;
Poole, Garth H. ;
Merry, Alan F. .
HPB, 2018, 20 (09) :786-794