Multilevel approaches to advancing the measurement of intellectual capital research field-What can we learn from the literature?

被引:19
作者
Ferreira, Joao J. M. [1 ]
Fernandes, Cristina [1 ]
Veiga, Pedro [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Beira Interior UBI, Fac Ciencias Sociais & Humanas, NECE Res Unit Business Sci, Dept Management & Econ, Covilha, Portugal
[2] UBI, NECE Res Unit Business Sci, Viseu, Portugal
[3] Inst Politecn Viseu, Viseu, Portugal
关键词
Intellectual capital measurement; Systematic literature review; Multilevel approaches; Micro level; Meso level; Macro level; PERFORMANCE EMPIRICAL-EVIDENCE; FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE; MANAGEMENT; KNOWLEDGE; SECTOR; MODEL; DISCLOSURE; IMPACT; PRIORITIZATION; UNIVERSITIES;
D O I
10.1108/JIC-07-2020-0221
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Purpose This study seeks to provide a broad ranging review that identifies, summarises and integrates the different multi-level approaches contributing to advances in research on measuring IC. This furthermore sets out and highlights an agenda for future research. Design/methodology/approach Deploying a systematic and thorough review of the literature, the authors were able to identify 60 articles and identify the main theories applied and the respective methodological orientations of these articles across three levels of analysis: micro, meso and macro. Findings The study's findings suggest that the literature on measuring IC has approached the theme across three different levels -micro, meso and macro. In addition, the results enable the identification of seven dimensions to IC: competitive advantage, economic value generated, resources and capacities, corporate governance, IC components, innovation management and the dissemination of IC. Research limitations/implications The mixed-methods approach, which combines a traditional systematic literature review with ontological thematic analysis, casts light on the core aspects that led to the identification of a new approach in the academic literature on measuring IC. Practical implications This study puts forward a holistic model with measurements for IC across the three levels of analysis as well as the respective criteria for choosing the variables. Originality/value This study represents a first attempt to analyse the emerging literature on IC measurement through a multi-level approach; integrating and extracting the potential theoretical contributions in this field of knowledge; proposing an integrated model as well as a theoretically relevant and innovative research agenda that opens up paths to future research projects.
引用
收藏
页码:971 / 999
页数:29
相关论文
共 87 条
  • [1] Navarro JLA, 2012, PROCEEDINGS OF THE 4TH EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL, P17
  • [2] Navarro JLA, 2011, AFR J BUS MANAGE, V5, P6707
  • [3] Intellectual capital and sustainable development: A systematic literature review
    Alvino, Federico
    Di Vaio, Assunta
    Hassan, Rohail
    Palladino, Rosa
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL, 2021, 22 (01) : 76 - 94
  • [4] Andreini D., 2019, FAMILY BUSINESS REV, V33, P18
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2008, SYSTEMATIC REV META
  • [6] Intellectual capital and business model: a systematic literature review to explore their linkages
    Baima, Gabriele
    Forliano, Canio
    Santoro, Gabriele
    Vrontis, Demetris
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL, 2021, 22 (03) : 653 - 679
  • [7] The extent and impact of intellectual capital research: a two decade analysis
    Bamel, Umesh
    Pereira, Vijay
    Del Giudice, Manlio
    Temouri, Yama
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL, 2022, 23 (02) : 375 - 400
  • [8] Journal of Intellectual Capital: a review of emerging themes and future trends
    Bellucci, Marco
    Marzi, Giacomo
    Orlando, Beatrice
    Ciampi, Francesco
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL, 2021, 22 (04) : 744 - 767
  • [9] Boudreau JW, 1997, HUM RESOURCE MANAGE, V36, P343, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-050X(199723)36:3<343::AID-HRM6>3.3.CO
  • [10] 2-P