Induction when rats respond for liquid-sucrose reinforcement as a function of amount of upcoming "work"

被引:0
作者
Weatherly, Jeffrey N. [1 ]
Bauste, Grant A. [1 ]
McDougall, Casey L. [1 ]
Nurnberger, Jeri T. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ N Dakota, Dept Psychol, Grand Forks, ND 58202 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1007/BF03395559
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Previous research has shown that rats increase their rate of responding for 1% sucrose reinforcement in the first half of the session if food-pellet, rather than 1% sucrose, reinforcement will be available in the second half (i.e., positive induction). Four experiments investigated whether this induction effect would be changed by altering the amount of "work" required to earn reinforcement in the second half of the session. In Experiments 1, 2, and 3, rats pressed a lever for 1% sucrose delivered by a random-interval 60-s schedule during the first 25 min of the session. In different conditions, the reward in the second half was either 1% sucrose or a food pellet delivered on a fixed-ratio (FIR) 10, 20, or 40 schedule. The FR schedule was in effect throughout the second half of the session (Experiment 1), until 25 reinforcers had been collected and then extinction was in effect (Experiment 2), or until 25 reinforcers had been collected and then the session ended (Experiment 3). Positive induction occurred in each experiment, but did not vary as a function of upcoming FR requirement. Experiment 4 yoked the rate of reinforcement on a random-interval schedule in the second half of the session to that obtained when subjects responded on a random-ratio schedule. Similar induction effects were observed regardless of which schedule was in effect in the second half of the session. These results suggest induction is primarily controlled by the availability of upcoming differential reinforcement, not by upcoming "work."
引用
收藏
页码:429 / 446
页数:18
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]   Work ethic in pigeons: Reward value is directly related to the effort or time required to obtain the reward [J].
Clement, TS ;
Feltus, JR ;
Kaiser, DN ;
Zentall, TR .
PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2000, 7 (01) :100-106
[2]   ORIGIN AND FUNCTIONS OF ADJUNCTIVE BEHAVIOR [J].
FALK, JL .
ANIMAL LEARNING & BEHAVIOR, 1977, 5 (04) :325-335
[3]   Cost can increase preference in starlings [J].
Kacelnik, A ;
Marsh, B .
ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR, 2002, 63 :245-250
[4]  
*NAT RES COUNC, 1996, GUID CAR US LAB AN
[5]   THE ANALYSIS OF BEHAVIORAL MOMENTUM [J].
NEVIN, JA ;
MANDELL, C ;
ATAK, JR .
JOURNAL OF THE EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS OF BEHAVIOR, 1983, 39 (01) :49-59
[6]   Induction with upcoming food-pellet reinforcement [J].
Weatherly, JN ;
Davis, CS ;
Melville, CL .
LEARNING AND MOTIVATION, 2000, 31 (02) :180-199
[7]   Induction produced by upcoming food-pellet reinforcement: Effects on subsequent operant responding [J].
Weatherly, JN ;
Arthur, EIL ;
Palbicki, J ;
Nurnberger, JT .
LEARNING AND MOTIVATION, 2004, 35 (03) :189-207
[8]   Effect of upcoming reward type when rats press a lever for ethanol [J].
Weatherly, JN ;
Bishop, KL ;
Borowiak, DM .
JOURNAL OF GENERAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2004, 131 (02) :181-192
[9]   Altering "motivational" variables alters induction produced by upcoming food-pellet reinforcement [J].
Weatherly, JN ;
Arthur, EIL ;
Tischart, LM .
ANIMAL COGNITION, 2003, 6 (01) :17-26
[10]   On the determinants of induction in responding for sucrose when food pellet reinforcement is upcoming [J].
Weatherly, JN ;
Plumm, KM ;
Smith, JR ;
Roberts, WA .
ANIMAL LEARNING & BEHAVIOR, 2002, 30 (04) :315-329