Evaluation of Weather Research and Forecasting Model Predictions Using Micrometeorological Tower Observations

被引:14
作者
Kumar, Prashant [1 ]
Bhattacharya, Bimal K. [2 ]
Pal, P. K. [1 ]
机构
[1] ISRO, Earth Ocean Atmosphere Planetary Sci & Applicat A, Div Atmospher Sci, Atmospher & Ocean Sci Grp,Space Applicat Ctr, Ahmadabad 380015, Gujarat, India
[2] ISRO, Crop Inventory & Agroecosyst Div CAD, ABHG, Ahmadabad 380015, Gujarat, India
关键词
Atmospheric surface layer; Micrometeorological observations; Model verification; Weather Research and Forecasting model; SURFACE; IMPACT; PARAMETERIZATION; FLUXES; MM5; SATELLITE; IMPLEMENTATION; ASSIMILATION; RADIATION; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1007/s10546-015-0061-5
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
Here we assess the predictive skill of short-range weather forecasts from the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model with the help of micrometeorological tower observations. WRF model forecasts at a 3-h temporal resolution and 5000-m spatial resolution are compared with ground observations collected at micrometeorological towers during the year 2011 over the Indian landmass. Results show good agreement between the WRF model forecast and tower observed surface temperature and relative humidity, 10-m wind speed, and surface pressure. The WRF model simulations of surface energy fluxes, such as incoming shortwave, longwave radiation, and ground heat flux are also compared with micrometeorological tower measurements. Relatively high errors in incoming shortwave radiation flux may be attributed to the lack of accurate cloud prediction and the non-inclusion of aerosol load. The cyclic pattern of errors in surface relative humidity is found to be tightly and oppositely coupled with the incoming longwave radiation flux. Errors in soil heat fluxes during daytime hours are dominated by errors in the incoming shortwave radiation flux.
引用
收藏
页码:293 / 308
页数:16
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]   On the diurnal cycle of urban aerosols, black carbon and the occurrence of new particle formation events in springtime Sao Paulo, Brazil [J].
Backman, J. ;
Rizzo, L. V. ;
Hakala, J. ;
Nieminen, T. ;
Manninen, H. E. ;
Morais, F. ;
Aalto, P. P. ;
Siivola, E. ;
Carbone, S. ;
Hillamo, R. ;
Artaxo, P. ;
Virkkula, A. ;
Petaja, T. ;
Kulmala, M. .
ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS, 2012, 12 (23) :11733-11751
[2]   Evaluation of surface and upper air fine scale WRF meteorological modeling of the May and June 2010 CalNex period in California [J].
Baker, Kirk R. ;
Misenis, Chris ;
Obland, Michael D. ;
Ferrare, Richard A. ;
Scarino, Amy J. ;
Kelly, James T. .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2013, 80 :299-309
[3]  
Barker DM, 2004, MON WEATHER REV, V132, P897, DOI 10.1175/1520-0493(2004)132<0897:ATVDAS>2.0.CO
[4]  
2
[5]  
BELJAARS ACM, 1991, J APPL METEOROL, V30, P327, DOI 10.1175/1520-0450(1991)030<0327:FPOLSF>2.0.CO
[6]  
2
[7]   Assessing solar energy potential using diurnal remote-sensing observations from Kalpana-1 VHRR and validation over the Indian landmass [J].
Bhattacharya, Bimal K. ;
Padmanabhan, N. ;
Mahammed, Sazid ;
Ramakrishnan, R. ;
Parihar, J. S. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING, 2013, 34 (20) :7069-7090
[8]  
Bhattacharya BK, 2009, ISPRS 38 8 W3 WORKSH, P72
[9]  
Bhattacharya BK, 2013, SACEPSAABHGIGBPEMEVS, P1
[10]  
Chen F, 2001, MON WEATHER REV, V129, P569, DOI 10.1175/1520-0493(2001)129<0569:CAALSH>2.0.CO