Variability in Response to Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation of the Motor Cortex

被引:591
|
作者
Wiethoff, Sarah [1 ]
Hamada, Masashi [1 ,2 ]
Rothwell, John C. [1 ]
机构
[1] UCL Inst Neurol, Sobell Dept Motor Neurosci & Movement Disorders, London WC1N 3BG, England
[2] Univ Tokyo, Dept Neurol, Grad Sch Med, Bunkyo Ku, Tokyo 1138655, Japan
关键词
Transcranial direct current stimulation; (TDCS); I-waves; Plasticity; Motor cortex; Facilitation; PAIRED ASSOCIATIVE STIMULATION; THETA-BURST STIMULATION; MAGNETIC STIMULATION; CORTICAL PLASTICITY; CORTICOSPINAL EXCITABILITY; ELECTRIC-FIELDS; SURFACE EMG; MODULATION; POLARIZATION; POTENTIALS;
D O I
10.1016/j.brs.2014.02.003
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Responses to a number of different plasticity-inducing brain stimulation protocols are highly variable. However there is little data available on the variability of response to transcranial direct current stimulation (TDCS). Objective: We tested the effects of TDCS over the motor cortex on corticospinal excitability. We also examined whether an individual's response could be predicted from measurements of onset latency of motor evoked potential (MEP) following stimulation with different orientations of monophasic transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). Methods: Fifty-three healthy subjects participated in a crossover-design. Baseline latency measurements with different coil orientations and MEPs were recorded from the first dorsal interosseous muscle prior to the application of 10 min of 2 mA TDCS (0.057 mA/cm(2)). Thirty MEPs were measured every 5 min for up to half an hour after the intervention to assess after-effects on corticospinal excitability. Results: Anodal TDCS at 2 mA facilitated MEPs whereas there was no significant effect of 2 mA cathodal TDCS. A two-step cluster analysis suggested that approximately 50% individuals had only a minor, or no response to TDCS whereas the remainder had a facilitatory effect to both forms of stimulation. There was a significant correlation between the latency difference of MEPs (anterior-posterior stimulation minus latero-medial stimulation) and the response to anodal, but not cathodal TDCS. Conclusions: The large variability in response to these TDCS protocols is in line with similar studies using other forms of non-invasive brain stimulation. The effects highlight the need to develop more robust protocols, and understand the individual factors that determine responsiveness. (C) 2014 Published by Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:468 / 475
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Electrophysiological Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Neural Activity in the Rat Motor Cortex
    Tanaka, Tomoko
    Isomura, Yoshikazu
    Kobayashi, Kazuto
    Hanakawa, Takashi
    Tanaka, Satoshi
    Honda, Manabu
    FRONTIERS IN NEUROSCIENCE, 2020, 14
  • [22] Expanding the parameter space of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation of the primary motor cortex
    Agboada, Desmond
    Samani, Mohsen Mosayebi
    Jamil, Asif
    Kuo, Min-Fang
    Nitsche, Michael A.
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2019, 9 (1)
  • [23] Single session transcranial direct current stimulation to the primary motor cortex fails to enhance early motor sequence learning in Parkinson's disease
    Simpson, Michael William
    Mak, Margaret
    BEHAVIOURAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 2022, 418
  • [24] Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on cortex modulation by stimulation of the primary motor cortex and parietal cortex in humans
    Bashir, Shahid
    Aisha, Dowihi
    Hamza, Ali
    Al-Hussain, Fawaz
    Yoo, Woo-Kyoung
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2021, 131 (11) : 1107 - 1114
  • [25] Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Schizophrenia
    Agarwal, Mahavir
    Shivakumar, Venkataram
    Bose, Anushree
    Subramaniam, Aditi
    Nawani, Hema
    Chhabra, Harleen
    Kalmady, Sunil V.
    Narayanaswamy, Janardhanan C.
    Venkatasubramanian, Ganesan
    CLINICAL PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY AND NEUROSCIENCE, 2013, 11 (03) : 118 - 125
  • [26] The contribution of interindividual factors to variability of response in transcranial direct current stimulation studies
    Li, Lucia M.
    Uehara, Kazumasa
    Hanakawa, Takashi
    FRONTIERS IN CELLULAR NEUROSCIENCE, 2015, 9
  • [27] Intra-individual variability in the response to anodal transcranial direct current stimulation
    Lopez-Alonso, Virginia
    Fernandez-del-Olmo, Miguel
    Costantini, Alessia
    Gonzalez-Henriquez, Juan Jose
    Cheeran, Binith
    CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2015, 126 (12) : 2342 - 2347
  • [28] Effects of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation over lower limb primary motor cortex on motor learning in healthy individuals
    Foerster, Aguida
    Dutta, Anirban
    Kuo, Min-Fang
    Paulus, Walter
    Nitsche, Michael A.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2018, 47 (07) : 779 - 789
  • [29] The impact of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation of primary motor cortex on motor learning in older adults with low levels of activity
    Abedi, Razieh
    Talimkhani, Ailin
    Mohammadzadeh, Zahra
    Daryabor, Aliyeh
    Naimi, Sedigheh Sadat
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THERAPY AND REHABILITATION, 2022, 29 (10)
  • [30] Multisession anodal transcranial direct current stimulation induces motor cortex plasticity enhancement and motor learning generalization in an aging population
    Dumel, Gaelle
    Bourassa, Marie-Eve
    Charlebois-Plante, Camille
    Desjardins, Martine
    Doyon, Julien
    Saint-Amour, Dave
    De Beaumont, Louis
    CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2018, 129 (02) : 494 - 502