Variability in Response to Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation of the Motor Cortex

被引:591
|
作者
Wiethoff, Sarah [1 ]
Hamada, Masashi [1 ,2 ]
Rothwell, John C. [1 ]
机构
[1] UCL Inst Neurol, Sobell Dept Motor Neurosci & Movement Disorders, London WC1N 3BG, England
[2] Univ Tokyo, Dept Neurol, Grad Sch Med, Bunkyo Ku, Tokyo 1138655, Japan
关键词
Transcranial direct current stimulation; (TDCS); I-waves; Plasticity; Motor cortex; Facilitation; PAIRED ASSOCIATIVE STIMULATION; THETA-BURST STIMULATION; MAGNETIC STIMULATION; CORTICAL PLASTICITY; CORTICOSPINAL EXCITABILITY; ELECTRIC-FIELDS; SURFACE EMG; MODULATION; POLARIZATION; POTENTIALS;
D O I
10.1016/j.brs.2014.02.003
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Responses to a number of different plasticity-inducing brain stimulation protocols are highly variable. However there is little data available on the variability of response to transcranial direct current stimulation (TDCS). Objective: We tested the effects of TDCS over the motor cortex on corticospinal excitability. We also examined whether an individual's response could be predicted from measurements of onset latency of motor evoked potential (MEP) following stimulation with different orientations of monophasic transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). Methods: Fifty-three healthy subjects participated in a crossover-design. Baseline latency measurements with different coil orientations and MEPs were recorded from the first dorsal interosseous muscle prior to the application of 10 min of 2 mA TDCS (0.057 mA/cm(2)). Thirty MEPs were measured every 5 min for up to half an hour after the intervention to assess after-effects on corticospinal excitability. Results: Anodal TDCS at 2 mA facilitated MEPs whereas there was no significant effect of 2 mA cathodal TDCS. A two-step cluster analysis suggested that approximately 50% individuals had only a minor, or no response to TDCS whereas the remainder had a facilitatory effect to both forms of stimulation. There was a significant correlation between the latency difference of MEPs (anterior-posterior stimulation minus latero-medial stimulation) and the response to anodal, but not cathodal TDCS. Conclusions: The large variability in response to these TDCS protocols is in line with similar studies using other forms of non-invasive brain stimulation. The effects highlight the need to develop more robust protocols, and understand the individual factors that determine responsiveness. (C) 2014 Published by Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:468 / 475
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Effects of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation on motor evoked potentials variability in humans
    Bashir, Shahid
    Ahmad, Shafiq
    Alatefi, Moath
    Hamza, Ali
    Sharaf, Mohamed
    Fecteau, Shirely
    Yoo, Woo Kyoung
    PHYSIOLOGICAL REPORTS, 2019, 7 (13):
  • [2] Variability in Response to Quadripulse Stimulation of the Motor Cortex
    Nakamura, Koichiro
    Groiss, Stefan Jun
    Hamada, Masashi
    Enomoto, Hiroyuki
    Kadowaki, Suguru
    Abe, Mitsunari
    Murakami, Takenobu
    Wiratman, Winnugroho
    Chang, Fangyu
    Kobayashi, Shunsuke
    Hanajima, Ritsuko
    Terao, Yasuo
    Ugawa, Yoshikazu
    BRAIN STIMULATION, 2016, 9 (06) : 859 - 866
  • [3] Can genetic polymorphisms predict response variability to anodal transcranial direct current stimulation of the primary motor cortex?
    Pellegrini, Michael
    Zoghi, Maryam
    Jaberzadeh, Shapour
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2021, 53 (05) : 1569 - 1591
  • [4] Characterizing the application of transcranial direct current stimulation in human pharyngeal motor cortex
    Jefferson, Samantha
    Mistry, Satish
    Singh, Salil
    Rothwell, John
    Hamdy, Shaheen
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-GASTROINTESTINAL AND LIVER PHYSIOLOGY, 2009, 297 (06): : G1035 - G1040
  • [5] Transcranial direct current stimulation over the primary motor cortex during fMRI
    Antal, Andrea
    Polania, Rafael
    Schmidt-Samoa, Carsten
    Dechent, Peter
    Paulus, Walter
    NEUROIMAGE, 2011, 55 (02) : 590 - 596
  • [6] Neuroplasticity and network connectivity of the motor cortex following stroke: A transcranial direct current stimulation study
    Hordacre, Brenton
    Moezzi, Bahar
    Ridding, Michael C.
    HUMAN BRAIN MAPPING, 2018, 39 (08) : 3326 - 3339
  • [7] Exploring and optimizing the neuroplastic effects of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation over the primary motor cortex of older humans
    Farnad, Leila
    Ghasemian-Shirvan, Ensiyeh
    Mosayebi-Samani, Mohsen
    Kuo, Min-Fang
    Nitsche, Michael A.
    BRAIN STIMULATION, 2021, 14 (03) : 622 - 634
  • [8] Corticospinal excitability enhancement with simultaneous transcranial near-infrared stimulation and anodal direct current stimulation of motor cortex
    Song, Penghui
    Li, Siran
    Hao, Wensi
    Wei, Min
    Liu, Jianghong
    Lin, Hua
    Hu, Shimin
    Dai, Xiaona
    Wang, Jing
    Wang, Rong
    Wang, Yuping
    CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2021, 132 (05) : 1018 - 1024
  • [9] Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation over the Vertex Enhances Leg Motor Cortex Excitability Bilaterally
    Ghosh, Soumya
    Hathorn, David
    Eisenhauer, Jennifer
    Dixon, Jesse
    Cooper, Ian D.
    BRAIN SCIENCES, 2019, 9 (05)
  • [10] Titrating the neuroplastic effects of cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over the primary motor cortex
    Samani, Mohsen Mosayebi
    Agboada, Desmond
    Jamil, Asif
    Kuo, Min-Fang
    Nitsche, Michael A.
    CORTEX, 2019, 119 : 350 - 361