Preoperative evaluation of tumour consistency in pituitary macroadenomas: a machine learning-based histogram analysis on conventional T2-weighted MRI

被引:57
作者
Zeynalova, Amalya [1 ]
Kocak, Burak [2 ]
Durmaz, Emine Sebnem [3 ]
Comunoglu, Nil [4 ]
Ozcan, Kerem [4 ]
Ozcan, Gamze [4 ]
Turk, Okan [5 ]
Tanriover, Necmettin [6 ]
Kocer, Naci [1 ]
Kizilkilic, Osman [1 ]
Islak, Civan [1 ]
机构
[1] Istanbul Univ Cerrahpasa, Dept Radiol, Cerrahpasa Med Fac, Istanbul, Turkey
[2] Istanbul Training & Res Hosp, Dept Radiol, Istanbul, Turkey
[3] Buyukcekmece Mimar Sinan State Hosp, Dept Radiol, Istanbul, Turkey
[4] Istanbul Univ Cerrahpasa, Dept Pathol, Cerrahpasa Med Fac, Istanbul, Turkey
[5] Istanbul Training & Res Hosp, Dept Neurosurg, Istanbul, Turkey
[6] Istanbul Univ Cerrahpasa, Dept Neurosurg, Cerrahpasa Med Fac, Istanbul, Turkey
关键词
Machine learning; Artificial intelligence; Magnetic resonance imaging; Texture analysis; Pituitary adenoma; SELECTION; ADENOMAS; BIAS; PREDICTION; FEATURES;
D O I
10.1007/s00234-019-02211-2
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
PurposeTo evaluate the potential value of machine learning (ML)-based histogram analysis (or first-order texture analysis) on T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for predicting consistency of pituitary macroadenomas (PMA) and to compare it with that of signal intensity ratio (SIR) evaluation.MethodsFifty-five patients with 13 hard and 42 soft PMAs were included in this retrospective study. Histogram features were extracted from coronal T2-weighted original, filtered and transformed MRI images by manual segmentation. To achieve balanced classes (38 hard vs 42 soft), multiple samples were obtained from different slices of the PMAs with hard consistency. Dimension reduction was done with reproducibility analysis, collinearity analysis and feature selection. ML classifier was artificial neural network (ANN). Reference standard for the classifications was based on surgical and histopathological findings. Predictive performance of histogram analysis was compared with that of SIR evaluation. The main metric for comparisons was the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).ResultsOnly 137 of 162 features had excellent reproducibility. Collinearity analysis yielded 20 features. Feature selection algorithm provided six texture features. For histogram analysis, the ANN correctly classified 72.5% of the PMAs regarding consistency with an AUC value of 0.710. For SIR evaluation, accuracy and AUC values were 74.5% and 0.551, respectively. Considering AUC values, ML-based histogram analysis performed better than SIR evaluation (z=2.312, p=0.021).ConclusionML-based T2-weighted MRI histogram analysis might be a useful technique in predicting the consistency of PMAs, with a better predictive performance than that of SIR evaluation.
引用
收藏
页码:767 / 774
页数:8
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]  
Abe N, 2010, EUR J RADIOL, V80, P412
[2]   A feature selection technique for classificatory analysis [J].
Ahmad, A ;
Dey, L .
PATTERN RECOGNITION LETTERS, 2005, 26 (01) :43-56
[3]   Predictive value of diffusion-weighted MRI for tumor consistency and resection rate of nonfunctional pituitary macroadenomas [J].
Alimohamadi, Maysam ;
Sanjari, Reza ;
Mortazavi, Abolghassem ;
Shirani, Mohamad ;
Tabriz, Hedieh Moradi ;
Kharazi, Homayoun Hadizadeh ;
Amirjamshidi, Abbas .
ACTA NEUROCHIRURGICA, 2014, 156 (12) :2245-2252
[4]   To assess the ability of MRI to predict consistency of pituitary macroadenomas [J].
Bahuleyan, B. ;
Raghuram, L. ;
Rajshekhar, V. ;
Chacko, A. G. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 2006, 20 (05) :324-326
[5]   IMPROVING INCREMENTAL WRAPPER-BASED SUBSET SELECTION VIA REPLACEMENT AND EARLY STOPPING [J].
Bermejo, Pablo ;
Gamez, Jose A. ;
Puerta, Jose M. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PATTERN RECOGNITION AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2011, 25 (05) :605-625
[6]   Preoperative MRI Evaluation of Pituitary Macroadenoma: Imaging Features Predictive of Successful Transsphenoidal Surgery [J].
Boxerman, Jerrold L. ;
Rogg, Jeffrey M. ;
Donahue, John E. ;
Machan, Jason T. ;
Goldman, Marc A. ;
Doberstein, Curt E. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2010, 195 (03) :720-728
[7]  
Cawley GC, 2010, J MACH LEARN RES, V11, P2079
[8]  
Chakrabortty Shushovan, 1993, Neurologia Medico-Chirurgica, V33, P81, DOI 10.2176/nmc.33.81
[9]   Influence of MRI acquisition protocols and image intensity normalization methods on texture classification [J].
Collewet, G ;
Strzelecki, M ;
Mariette, F .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2004, 22 (01) :81-91
[10]  
Demsar J, 2006, J MACH LEARN RES, V7, P1