Validation of a basic neurosonology laboratory for detecting cervical carotid artery stenosis

被引:2
作者
de la Cruz Cosme, C. [1 ]
Dawid Milner, M. S. [2 ]
Ojeda Burgos, G. [3 ]
Gallardo Tur, A. [4 ]
Marquez Martinez, M. [1 ]
Segura, T. [5 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Univ Virgen de la Victoria, Serv Neurol, Malaga, Spain
[2] Univ Malaga, CIMES, Unidad Neurofisiol Sistema Nervioso Autonomo, Malaga, Spain
[3] Hosp Univ Virgen Victoria, Serv Med Interna, Malaga, Spain
[4] FIMABIS Fdn Publ Andaluza Invest Malaga Biomed &, Malaga, Spain
[5] Hosp Univ Albacete, Serv Neurol, Albacete, Spain
来源
NEUROLOGIA | 2019年 / 34卷 / 06期
关键词
Doppler ultrasound; Carotid artery stenosis; Carotid artery disease; Intracranial thrombosis; Intracranial arteriosclerosis; Intracranial stenosis; MAGNETIC-RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; DIGITAL-SUBTRACTION-ANGIOGRAPHY; DUPLEX ULTRASOUND; CT ANGIOGRAPHY; DOPPLER ULTRASOUND; MR-ANGIOGRAPHY; TRANSCRANIAL DOPPLER; PATIENT SELECTION; BIFURCATION; ULTRASONOGRAPHY;
D O I
10.1016/j.nrl.2017.01.015
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction: Most of the cases of ischaemic stroke in our setting are of atherothrombotic origin. Detecting intracranial and cervical carotid artery stenosis in patients with ischaemic stroke is therefore essential. Ultrasonography has become the toot of choice for diagnosing carotid artery stenosis because it is both readily accessible and reliable. However, use of this technique must be validated in each laboratory. The purpose of this study is to validate Doppler ultrasound in our laboratory as a means of detecting severe carotid artery stenosis. Patients and methods: We conducted an observational descriptive study to evaluate diagnostic tests. The results from transcranial and cervical carotid Doppler ultrasound scans conducted by neurologists were compared to those from carotid duplex scans performed by radiologists in patients diagnosed with stroke. Arteriography was considered the gold standard (MR angiography, CT angiography, or conventional arteriography). Results: Our sample included 228 patients. Transcranial and cervical carotid Doppler ultrasound showed a sensitivity of 95% and specificity of 100% for detection of carotid artery stenosis >70%, whereas carotid duplex displayed a sensitivity of 87% and a specificity of 94%. Transcranial carotid Doppler ultrasound achieved a sensitivity of 78% and a specificity of 98% for detection of intracranial stenosis. Conclusions: Doppler ultrasound in our neurosonology laboratory was found to be a useful diagnostic tool for detecting cervical carotid artery stenosis and demonstrated superiority to carotid duplex despite the lack of B-mode. Furthermore, this technique was found to be useful for detecting intracranial stenosis. (C) 2017 Sociedad Espanola de Neurologia. Published by Elsevier Espana, S.L.U.
引用
收藏
页码:367 / 375
页数:9
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]   CT angiography for the detection and characterization of carotid artery bifurcation disease [J].
Anderson, GB ;
Ashforth, R ;
Steinke, DE ;
Ferdinandy, R ;
Findlay, JM .
STROKE, 2000, 31 (09) :2168-2174
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1991, STROKE, V22, P816
[3]  
[Anonymous], Global Status Report on Noncommunicable Diseases
[4]  
Anzidei M, 2012, RADIOL MED, V117, P54, DOI 10.1007/s11547-011-0651-3
[5]   Magnetic resonance angiography is an accurate imaging adjunct to duplex ultrasound scan in patient selection for carotid endarterectomy [J].
Back, MR ;
Wilson, JS ;
Rushing, G ;
Stordahl, N ;
Linden, C ;
Johnson, BL ;
Bandyk, DF .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2000, 32 (03) :429-438
[6]  
Borisch I, 2003, AM J NEURORADIOL, V24, P1117
[7]  
Calleja Puerta S., 2006, UTILIDAD DOPPLER TRA
[8]  
CARRIERO A, 1995, J NEURORADIOLOGY, V22, P103
[9]   DETECTION OF CAROTID STENOSIS - FROM NASCET RESULTS TO CLINICAL-PRACTICE [J].
CHANG, YJ ;
GOLBY, AJ ;
ALBERS, GW .
STROKE, 1995, 26 (08) :1325-1328
[10]   High-grade stenoses of the internal carotid artery: Comparison of high-resolution contrast enhanced 3D MRA, duplex sonography and power Doppler imaging [J].
Clevert, D. -A. ;
Johnson, T. ;
Michaely, H. ;
Jung, E. M. ;
Flach, P. M. ;
Strautz, T. I. ;
Clevert, D. -A. ;
Reiser, M. ;
Schoenberg, S. O. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2006, 60 (03) :379-386