Efficacy of salmeterol/fluticasone propionate by GOLD stage of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: analysis from the randomised, placebo-controlled TORCH study

被引:272
|
作者
Jenkins, Christine R. [1 ]
Jones, Paul W. [2 ]
Calverley, Peter M. A. [3 ]
Celli, Bartolome [4 ]
Anderson, Julie A.
Ferguson, Gary T. [5 ]
Yates, Julie C. [6 ]
Willits, Lisa R.
Vestbo, Joergen [7 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Woolcock Inst Med Res, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[2] Univ London, Div Cardiac & Vasc Sci, London, England
[3] Univ Hosp, Liverpool, Merseyside, England
[4] St Elizabeths Med Ctr, Boston, MA USA
[5] Pulm Res Inst SE Michigan, Livonia, MI USA
[6] GSK, Res Triangle Pk, NC USA
[7] Wythenshawe Hosp, Manchester M23 9LT, Lancs, England
[8] Univ Copenhagen, Hvidovre Hosp, DK-2650 Hvidovre, Denmark
来源
RESPIRATORY RESEARCH | 2009年 / 10卷
关键词
FLUTICASONE PROPIONATE; SALMETEROL; SAFETY; COPD; SURVIVAL;
D O I
10.1186/1465-9921-10-59
中图分类号
R56 [呼吸系及胸部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The efficacy of inhaled salmeterol plus fluticasone propionate (SFC) in patients with severe or very severe COPD is well documented. However, there are only limited data about the influence of GOLD severity staging on the effectiveness of SFC, particularly in patients with milder disease. Methods: TORCH was a 3-year, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of 6112 patients with moderate/severe COPD with pre-bronchodilator FEV1 < 60% predicted (mean age 65 years, 76% male, mean 44% predicted FEV1, 43% current smokers). To understand the relative efficacy of SFC and its components by GOLD stages, we conducted a post-hoc analysis of the TORCH dataset using baseline post-bronchodilator FEV1 to segment patients into three groups: moderate COPD (GOLD stage II and above: >= 50%; n = 2156), severe COPD (GOLD stage III: 30% to < 50%; n = 3019) and very severe COPD (GOLD stage IV: < 30%; n = 937). Results: Compared with placebo, SFC improved post-bronchodilator FEV1: 101 ml (95% confidence interval [CI]: 71, 132) in GOLD stage II, 82 ml (95% CI: 60, 104) in GOLD stage III and 96 ml (95% CI: 54, 138) in GOLD stage IV patients, and reduced the rate of exacerbations: 31% (95% CI: 19, 40) in GOLD stage II, 26% (95% CI: 17, 34) in GOLD stage III and 14% (95% CI: -4, 29) in GOLD stage IV. SFC improved health status to a greater extent than other treatments regardless of baseline GOLD stage. Similarly, SFC reduced the risk of death by 33% (hazard ratio [HR] 0.67; 95% CI: 0.45, 0.98) for GOLD stage II, 5% (HR 0.95; 95% CI: 0.73, 1.24) for GOLD stage III, and 30% (HR 0.70; 95% CI: 0.47, 1.05) for GOLD stage IV. The rates of adverse events were similar across treatment arms and increased with disease severity. Overall, there was a higher incidence of pneumonia in the fluticasone propionate and SFC arms, compared with other treatments in all GOLD stages. Conclusion: In the TORCH study, SFC reduced moderate-to-severe exacerbations and improved health status and FEV1 across GOLD stages. Treatment with SFC may be associated with reduced mortality compared with placebo in patients with GOLD stage II disease. The effects were similar to those reported for the study as a whole. Thus, SFC is an effective treatment option for patients with GOLD stage II COPD.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Efficacy of salmeterol/fluticasone propionate by GOLD stage of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: analysis from the randomised, placebo-controlled TORCH study
    Christine R Jenkins
    Paul W Jones
    Peter MA Calverley
    Bartolome Celli
    Julie A Anderson
    Gary T Ferguson
    Julie C Yates
    Lisa R Willits
    Jörgen Vestbo
    Respiratory Research, 10
  • [2] Efficacy and Safety Analysis of Salmeterol/Fluticasone Propionate with Tiotropium Bromide for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
    Zhang, Zili
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES, 2024, 86 : 128 - 133
  • [3] Inhaled salmeterol/fluticasone propionate - A review of its use in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
    Fenton, C
    Keating, GM
    DRUGS, 2004, 64 (17) : 1975 - 1996
  • [4] Evaluation of salmeterol xinafoate plus fluticasone propionate for the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
    Restrepo, Ruben D.
    Tate, Andrew
    Coquat, Joshua
    EXPERT OPINION ON PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2013, 14 (14) : 1993 - 2002
  • [5] Improvement of airflow limitation by fluticasone propionate/salmeterol in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: what is the specific marker?
    Akamatsu, Keiichiro
    Matsunaga, Kazuto
    Sugiura, Hisatoshi
    Koarai, Akira
    Hirano, Tsunahiko
    Minakata, Yoshiaki
    Ichinose, Masakazu
    FRONTIERS IN PHARMACOLOGY, 2011, 2
  • [6] Effects of adding salmeterol/fluticasone propionate to tiotropium on airway dimensions in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
    Hoshino, Makoto
    Ohtawa, Junichi
    RESPIROLOGY, 2011, 16 (01) : 95 - 101
  • [7] Real-life use of fluticasone propionate/salmeterol in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a French observational study
    Roche, Nicolas
    Pribil, Celine
    Van Ganse, Eric
    Serrier, Philippe
    Housset, Bruno
    Poirier, Deborah
    Texier, Nathalie
    Schueck, Stephane
    Boucot, Isabelle
    BMC PULMONARY MEDICINE, 2014, 14
  • [8] Umeclidinium plus vilanterol versus fluticasone propionate plus salmeterol for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials
    Zhai, Chunjuan
    Wang, Fen
    Xu, Ruie
    Sun, Xia
    Ma, Wenbin
    Wang, Li
    POSTGRADUATE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2024, 100 (1188) : 721 - 729
  • [9] Fluticasone propionate/salmeterol 250/50 μg versus salmeterol 50 μg after chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbation
    Jill A Ohar
    Glenn D Crater
    Amanda Emmett
    Thomas J Ferro
    Andrea N Morris
    Ibrahim Raphiou
    Peruvemba S Sriram
    Mark T Dransfield
    Respiratory Research, 15
  • [10] Effects of Tiotropium and Salmeterol/Fluticasone Propionate on Airway Wall Thickness in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
    Hoshino, Makoto
    Ohtawa, Junichi
    RESPIRATION, 2013, 86 (04) : 280 - 287