On Robustness Paradox in Air Traffic Networks

被引:20
作者
Cai, Qing [1 ]
Alam, Sameer [1 ]
Vu Duong [1 ]
机构
[1] Nanyang Technol Univ, Sch Mech & Aerosp Engn, Singapore 639798, Singapore
来源
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NETWORK SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING | 2020年 / 7卷 / 04期
关键词
Robustness; Optimization; Measurement; Evolutionary computation; Atmospheric modeling; Spectral analysis; Airports; Air transport; air traffic network; network robustness; multiobjective optimization; TRANSPORT NETWORK; VULNERABILITY; RESILIENCE; ALGORITHM;
D O I
10.1109/TNSE.2020.3015728
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Air traffic is operated in an air traffic network (ATN) environment. It is pertinent to improve the robustness of ATNs as they are frequently exposed to manifold uncertainties which can break down their functioning components. Existing studies improve the robustness of an ATN by either rewiring its links or adding more ones. In this paper we discover the robustness paradox phenomenon in ATNs. Specifically, we claim to improve the robustness of an ATN by removing its links. In order to determine the links whose removal can improve an ATN's robustness, we develop a bi-objective optimization model with one objective maximizing the network's robustness and the other one minimizing the number of links to be removed. We further apply and modify a non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm (NSGA-II) to optimize the developed model. We then carry out experiments on nine real-world ATNs to validate the effectiveness of the proposed idea. We also compare the modified NSGA-II algorithm against NSGA-III, and MODPSO, which are famous and efficient multiobjective evolutionary algorithms. Experiments indicate that NSGA-II outperforms the compared algorithms and that robustness paradox phenomenon does exist in ATNs. This work provides a new perspective for aviation decision makers to better design and manage ATNs.
引用
收藏
页码:3087 / 3099
页数:13
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], AIRP AIRL ROUT DAT, VOpenFlights
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2017, P 8 INT C COMP METH
[3]   Investigating transport network vulnerability by capacity weighted spectral analysis [J].
Bell, Michael G. H. ;
Kurauchi, Fumitaka ;
Perera, Supun ;
Wong, Walter .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART B-METHODOLOGICAL, 2017, 99 :251-266
[4]   Interdependency and Vulnerability of Multipartite Networks under Target Node Attacks [J].
Cai, Qing ;
Pratama, Mahardhika ;
Alam, Sameer .
COMPLEXITY, 2019, 2019
[5]   Network Structural Balance Based on Evolutionary Multiobjective Optimization: A Two-Step Approach [J].
Cai, Qing ;
Gong, Maoguo ;
Ruan, Shasha ;
Miao, Qiguang ;
Du, Haifeng .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION, 2015, 19 (06) :903-916
[6]  
Calkins H, 2017, J ARRYTHM, V33, P369, DOI 10.1016/j.joa.2017.08.001
[7]   A knowledge-transfer-based learning framework for airspace operation complexity evaluation [J].
Cao, Xianbin ;
Zhu, Xi ;
Tian, Zhencai ;
Chen, Jun ;
Wu, Dapeng ;
Du, Wenbo .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART C-EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES, 2018, 95 :61-81
[8]   Resilience of the US National Airspace System Airport Network [J].
Clark, Kevin L. ;
Bhatia, Udit ;
Kodra, Evan A. ;
Ganguly, Auroop R. .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS, 2018, 19 (12) :3785-3794
[9]   Exploration and Exploitation in Evolutionary Algorithms: A Survey [J].
Crepinsek, Matej ;
Liu, Shih-Hsi ;
Mernik, Marjan .
ACM COMPUTING SURVEYS, 2013, 45 (03)
[10]   A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II [J].
Deb, K ;
Pratap, A ;
Agarwal, S ;
Meyarivan, T .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION, 2002, 6 (02) :182-197