The application of bibliometric analysis: disciplinary and user aspects

被引:137
作者
Ellegaard, Ole [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Lib Southern Denmark, Odense M, Denmark
关键词
Bibliometric analysis; Policy implications; Publication analysis; Citation analysis; H-INDEX; IMPACT; RANKING; LIBRARY; METRICS;
D O I
10.1007/s11192-018-2765-z
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Bibliometric analysis has been used increasingly as a tool within the scientific community. Interplay is vital between those involved in refining bibliometric methods and the recipients of this type of analysis. Production as well as citations patterns reflect working methodologies in different disciplines within the specialized Library and Information Science (LIS) field, as well as in the non-specialist (non-LIS) professional field. We extract the literature on bibliometric analyses from Web of Science in all fields of science and analyze clustering of co-occurring keywords at an aggregate level. It reveals areas of interconnected literature with different impact on the LIS and the non-LIS community.We classify and categorize bibliometric articles that obtain the most citations in accordance with a modified version of Derrick's, Jonker's and Lewison's method (Derrick et al. in Proceedings, 17th international conference on science and technology indicators. STI, Montreal, 2012). The data demonstrates that cross-referencing between the LIS and the non-LIS field is modest in publications outside their main categories of interest, i.e. discussions of various bibliometric issues or strict analyses of various topics. We identify some fields as less well-covered bibliometrically.
引用
收藏
页码:181 / 202
页数:22
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]   Do metrics matter? [J].
Abbott, Alison ;
Cyranoski, David ;
Jones, Nicola ;
Maher, Brendan ;
Schiermeier, Quirin ;
Van Noorden, Richard .
NATURE, 2010, 465 (7300) :860-862
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2015, Incentives and Performance
[3]   Which h-index? - A comparison of WoS, Scopus and Google Scholar [J].
Bar-Ilan, Judit .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 2008, 74 (02) :257-271
[4]   Usage Impact Factor: The effects of sample characteristics on usage-based impact metrics [J].
Bollen, Johan ;
van de Sompel, Herbert .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2008, 59 (01) :136-149
[5]  
Bonnell AG, 2016, AUST UNIV REV, V58, P54
[6]   Does the h-index for ranking of scientists really work? [J].
Bornmann, L ;
Daniel, HD .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 2005, 65 (03) :391-392
[7]   Are there better indices for evaluation purposes than the h index?: a comparison of nine different variants of the h index using data from biomedicine [J].
Bornmann, Lutz ;
Mutz, Ruediger ;
Daniel, Hans-Dieter .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2008, 59 (05) :830-837
[8]   Ranking and mapping of universities and research-focused institutions worldwide based on highly-cited papers A visualisation of results from multi-level models [J].
Bornmann, Lutz ;
Stefaner, Moritz ;
de Moya Anegon, Felix ;
Mutz, Ruediger .
ONLINE INFORMATION REVIEW, 2014, 38 (01) :43-58
[9]   How to improve the use of metrics [J].
Braun, Tibor ;
Bergstrom, Carl T. ;
Frey, Bruno S. ;
Osterloh, Margit ;
West, Jevin D. ;
Pendlebury, David ;
Rohn, Jennifer .
NATURE, 2010, 465 (7300) :870-872
[10]   Competencies for bibliometrics [J].
Cox, Andrew ;
Gadd, Elizabeth ;
Petersohn, Sabrina ;
Sbaffi, Laura .
JOURNAL OF LIBRARIANSHIP AND INFORMATION SCIENCE, 2019, 51 (03) :746-762