Commoning the seeds: alternative models of collective action and open innovation within French peasant seed groups for recreating local knowledge commons

被引:12
作者
Maze, Armelle [1 ,3 ]
Calabuig Domenech, Aida [1 ]
Goldringer, Isabelle [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Paris Saclay, INRAE, AgroParisTech, UMR SADAPT, F-75005 Paris, France
[2] Univ Paris Saclay, CNRS, INRAE, AgroParisTech,GQE Le Moulon, F-91190 Gif Sur Yvette, France
[3] INRAE, UMR SADAPT, 16 Rue Claude Bernard, F-75231 Paris 05, France
关键词
IAD; SES; Peer-to-peer production; Participatory plant breeding; Knowledge economy; Innovation; Institutional economics; Seed commons; NETWORKS; AGROBIODIVERSITY; COMMUNITIES; GOVERNANCE; MANAGEMENT; DIVERSITY; EVOLUTION; FRAMEWORK; PROPERTY; FARMERS;
D O I
10.1007/s10460-020-10172-z
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
In this article, we expand the analytical and theoretical foundations of the study of knowledge commons in the context of more classical agrarian commons, such as seed commons. We show that it is possible to overcome a number of criticisms of earlier work by Ostrom (Governing the commons. The evolution of institutions for collective action, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1990) on natural commons and its excludability/rivalry matrix in addressing the inclusive social practices of "commoning", defined as a way of living and acting for the preservation of the commons. Our empirical analysis emphasizes, using the most recent advances in the IAD/SES framework, the distributed and collaborative knowledge governance in a French peasant seed network as a key driver for reintroducing cultivated agrobiodiversity and on-farm seed conservation of ancient and landrace varieties. These inclusive peasant seed groups developed alternative peer-to-peer models of collaborative peasant-led community-based breeding and grassroots innovations in the search for more resilient population varieties. Our results highlight the various models of collective action within the network and discuss the organizational tradeoffs of opting out of peasant seed activities and recreating a shared collective knowledge base on the benefits of restoring cultivated agrobiodiversity. It helps us better understand how modern peasant seed groups function as epistemic communities which contributes to envisioning alternative agricultural systems.
引用
收藏
页码:541 / 559
页数:19
相关论文
共 85 条
  • [1] Acheson JamesM., 2003, CAPTURING COMMONS
  • [2] Analyzing decentralized resource regimes from a polycentric perspective
    Andersson, Krister P.
    Ostrom, Elinor
    [J]. POLICY SCIENCES, 2008, 41 (01) : 71 - 93
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2007, SCI CITOYENNES VIGIL
  • [4] Berkes F, 2000, ECOL APPL, V10, P1251, DOI 10.1890/1051-0761(2000)010[1251:ROTEKA]2.0.CO
  • [5] 2
  • [6] Evolution of co-management: Role of knowledge generation, bridging organizations and social learning
    Berkes, Fikret
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2009, 90 (05) : 1692 - 1702
  • [7] Bocci R, 2008, CAH AGRIC, V17, P216
  • [8] Bollier D., 2012, The wealth of the commons: A world beyond market and state
  • [9] Bonneuil Christophe, 2009, Genes, pouvoirs et profits. Recherche publique et regimes de production des savoirs de Mendel aux OGM
  • [10] Explaining the decrease in the genetic diversity of wheat in France over the 20th century
    Bonnin, Isabelle
    Bonneuil, Christophe
    Goffaux, Robin
    Montalent, Pierre
    Goldringer, Isabelle
    [J]. AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2014, 195 : 183 - 192