Accidents and Unpleasant Incidents: Worry in Transport and Prediction of Travel Behavior

被引:45
作者
Backer-Grondahl, Agathe [1 ]
Fyhri, Aslak [1 ]
Ulleberg, Pal [1 ,2 ]
Amundsen, Astrid Helene [1 ]
机构
[1] Inst Transport Econ, NO-0349 Oslo, Norway
[2] Univ Oslo, Dept Psychol, N-0317 Oslo, Norway
关键词
Risk perception; transport; travel behavior; worry; RISK PERCEPTION; PSYCHOMETRIC PARADIGM; PERCEIVED RISK; EXPLANATORY POWER;
D O I
10.1111/j.1539-6924.2009.01266.x
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Worry on nine different means of transport was measured in a Norwegian sample of 853 respondents. The main aim of the study was to investigate differences in worry about accidents and worry about unpleasant incidents, and how these two sorts of worry relate to various means of transport as well as transport behavior. Factor analyses of worry about accidents suggested a division between rail transport, road transport, and nonmotorized transport, whereas analyses of worry about unpleasant incidents suggested a division between transport modes where you interact with other people and "private" transport modes. Moreover, mean ratings of worry showed that respondents worried more about accidents than unpleasant incidents on private transport modes, and more about unpleasant incidents than accidents on public transport modes. Support for the distinction between worry about accidents and unpleasant incidents was also found when investigating relationships between both types of worry and behavioral adaptations: worry about accidents was more important than worry about unpleasant incidents in relation to behavioral adaptations on private means of transport, whereas the opposite was true for public means of transport. Finally, predictors of worry were investigated. The models of worry about accidents and worry about unpleasant incidents differed as to what predictors turned out significant. Knowledge about peoples' worries on different means of transport is important with regard to understanding and influencing transport and travel behavior, as well as attending to commuters' welfare.
引用
收藏
页码:1217 / 1226
页数:10
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [1] ALM C, 2002, 919 SWED NAT ROAD TR
  • [2] ALM C, 2000, 20007 KFB
  • [3] ALM C, 2004, 962 SWED NAT ROAD TR
  • [4] Risk perception and experience: Hazard personality profiles and individual differences
    Barnett, J
    Breakwell, GM
    [J]. RISK ANALYSIS, 2001, 21 (01) : 171 - 177
  • [5] Personality correlates of risk perception
    Bouyer, M
    Bagdassarian, S
    Chaabanne, S
    Mullet, E
    [J]. RISK ANALYSIS, 2001, 21 (03) : 457 - 465
  • [6] Participant-focused analysis:: explanatory power of the classic psychometric paradigm in risk perception
    Bronfman, Nicolas C.
    Abdon Cifuentes, Luis
    Vaneza Gutierrez, Virna
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RISK RESEARCH, 2008, 11 (06) : 735 - 753
  • [7] Accounting for variation in the explanatory power of the psychometric paradigm: The effects of aggregation and focus
    Bronfman, Nicolas C.
    Cifuentes, Luis Abdon
    Dekay, Michael L.
    Willis, Henry H.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RISK RESEARCH, 2007, 10 (04) : 527 - 554
  • [8] Risk perception and personality facets
    Chauvin, Bruno
    Hermand, Daniele
    Mullet, Etienne
    [J]. RISK ANALYSIS, 2007, 27 (01) : 171 - 185
  • [9] Costa P.T., 1992, NEO PI R PROFESSIONA
  • [10] How accurately does the public perceive differences in transport risks? An exploratory analysis of scales representing perceived risk
    Elvik, R
    Bjornskau, T
    [J]. ACCIDENT ANALYSIS AND PREVENTION, 2005, 37 (06) : 1005 - 1011