A systematic review of life cycle sustainability assessment: Current state, methodological challenges, and implementation issues

被引:132
作者
Costa, D. [1 ]
Quinteiro, P. [1 ]
Dias, A. C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Aveiro, Dept Environm & Planning, Ctr Environm & Marine Studies CESAM, Campus Univ Santiago, P-3810193 Aveiro, Portugal
关键词
Life cycle sustainability assessment (LCSA); Life cycle assessment (LCA); Life cycle costing (LCC); Social life cycle assessment (SLCA); Systematic review; GEOPOLITICAL SUPPLY RISK; MULTICRITERIA DECISION-MAKING; ASSESSMENT FRAMEWORK; ELECTRICITY-GENERATION; HYDROGEN-PRODUCTION; PRODUCTION PATHWAYS; INDUSTRIAL-SYSTEMS; SUPPORT FRAMEWORK; BIOGAS PRODUCTION; PRIORITIZATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.05.435
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The life cycle sustainability assessment (LCSA) is a tool to assess sustainability froma life cycle perspective, which has been receiving increased attention over the years. This work presents a systematic review of the current application of LCSA, presenting the foundations, main methods, current operationalization state, and major challenges to its broad implementation. The review protocol considered the search of keywords in Scopus and Web of Science databases. The search has considered the literature published or in the press until December 2018, resulting in the selection of 144 articles written in English. Of those, 71 articles operationalize LCSA in real case studies, while the remaining consist of review, viewpoint, and methodological development articles. This review demonstrates that the use of LCSA has been increasing in recent years. Today, the most applied approach is to consider LCSA as the sum of life cycle assessment, life cycle costing, and social life cycle assessment because it is built on the methodologies that already exist and are under continuous development. However, the lack of harmonization of the methodology is a central challenge to its operationalization. Therefore, LCSA still requires further improvement in, among others, definition of coherent system boundaries, the development of robust databases to allow the assessment of economic and social perspectives, definition of impact categories that allow comparability between studies, development of impact assessment methods, development of methods to carry out uncertainty analysis, and communication strategies. Besides, further case studies should be developed to support the improvement of the methodology and a better understanding of the interaction of the environmental, economic, and social aspects. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:774 / 787
页数:14
相关论文
共 161 条
[1]   Shades of Grey: Guidelines for Working with the Grey Literature in Systematic Reviews for Management and Organizational Studies [J].
Adams, Richard J. ;
Smart, Palie ;
Huff, Anne Sigismund .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT REVIEWS, 2017, 19 (04) :432-454
[2]   Ecovalue08-A new valuation set for environmental systems analysis tools [J].
Ahlroth, Sofia ;
Finnveden, Goran .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2011, 19 (17-18) :1994-2003
[3]   Life cycle sustainability assessment of electricity generation in Pakistan: Policy regime for a sustainable energy mix [J].
Akber, Muhammad Zeshan ;
Thaheem, Muhammad Jamaluddin ;
Arshad, Husnain .
ENERGY POLICY, 2017, 111 :111-126
[4]   Life cycle sustainability assessment (LCSA) for selection of sewer pipe materials [J].
Akhtar, Sharmin ;
Reza, Bahareh ;
Hewage, Kasun ;
Shahriar, Anjuman ;
Zargar, Amin ;
Sadiq, Rehan .
CLEAN TECHNOLOGIES AND ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY, 2015, 17 (04) :973-992
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2006, ISO14040 - Environmental management - Life cycle assessment - Principles and framework
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2012, J REMANUF
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2006, 14044 ISO, DOI DOI 10.1007/S11367-011-0297-3
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2009, Guidelines for Social Life Cycle Assessment of Products
[9]  
[Anonymous], 1996, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, DOI DOI 10.1007/BF02978703
[10]  
[Anonymous], ENVIRONMENTAL LIFE C