An Introduction to Item Response Theory for Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement

被引:282
作者
Nguyen, Tam H. [1 ]
Han, Hae-Ra [2 ]
Kim, Miyong T. [3 ]
Chan, Kitty S. [4 ]
机构
[1] Boston Coll, Connell Sch Nursing, Chestnut Hill, MA 02467 USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Nursing, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[3] Univ Texas Austin, Sch Nursing, Austin, TX 78701 USA
[4] Johns Hopkins Univ, Bloomberg Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Policy & Management, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
关键词
VALIDATION; ABILITY; MODEL;
D O I
10.1007/s40271-013-0041-0
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
The growing emphasis on patient-centered care has accelerated the demand for high-quality data from patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures. Traditionally, the development and validation of these measures has been guided by classical test theory. However, item response theory (IRT), an alternate measurement framework, offers promise for addressing practical measurement problems found in health-related research that have been difficult to solve through classical methods. This paper introduces foundational concepts in IRT, as well as commonly used models and their assumptions. Existing data on a combined sample (n = 636) of Korean American and Vietnamese American adults who responded to the High Blood Pressure Health Literacy Scale and the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 are used to exemplify typical applications of IRT. These examples illustrate how IRT can be used to improve the development, refinement, and evaluation of PRO measures. Greater use of methods based on this framework can increase the accuracy and efficiency with which PROs are measured.
引用
收藏
页码:23 / 35
页数:13
相关论文
共 68 条
[1]   RATING FORMULATION FOR ORDERED RESPONSE CATEGORIES [J].
ANDRICH, D .
PSYCHOMETRIKA, 1978, 43 (04) :561-573
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1993, Educational measurement: issues and practice
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2005, Assessing Quality of Life in Clinical Trials: Methods and Practice
[4]  
Baker F., 2001, The basis of Item Response Theory
[5]   CONTROLLING THE FALSE DISCOVERY RATE - A PRACTICAL AND POWERFUL APPROACH TO MULTIPLE TESTING [J].
BENJAMINI, Y ;
HOCHBERG, Y .
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES B-STATISTICAL METHODOLOGY, 1995, 57 (01) :289-300
[6]  
Birnbaum Allan., 1968, Statistical Theories of Mental Test Scores
[7]  
BOCK RD, 1972, PSYCHOMETRIKA, V37, P29
[8]  
Bond T, 2021, Applying the Rasch Model: Fundamental Measurement in the Human Sciences, V4th
[9]  
Brennan R.L., 2006, ED MEASUREMENT, P1
[10]  
Brook R H, 1979, Med Care, V17, piii