Tomographic follow-up of bone regeneration after bone block harvesting from the mandibular ramus

被引:12
作者
Diez, G. F. [1 ]
Fontao, F. N. G. K. [2 ]
Bassi, A. P. F. [3 ]
Gama, J. C. [4 ]
Claudino, M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Planalto Catarinense UNIPLAC, Dept Oral Surg, Lages, SC, Brazil
[2] Latin Amer Inst Dent Res & Educ ILAPEO, Postgrad Dept, BR-80710150 Curitiba, Parana, Brazil
[3] State Univ Sao Paulo UNESP, Dept Oral Surg, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[4] Latin Amer Inst Dent Res & Educ ILAPEO, BR-80710150 Curitiba, Parana, Brazil
关键词
bone transplantation; cone beam computed tomography; bone regeneration; RIDGE AUGMENTATION; DONOR SITES; GRAFTS; RECONSTRUCTION; IMPLANTS; MAXILLA; TIME;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijom.2013.08.010
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Autogenous bone is still considered the gold standard, and the applicability of autogenous bone grafts is well established. However, the possibility of second harvesting from the same donor region remains unclear. The aim of this study was to perform a prospective evaluation of hard tissue deposition in the mandibular ramus after bone block harvesting using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). Twenty-two patients with indications for augmentation procedures using autogenous bone from the mandibular ramus were selected. Three CBCT scans were performed with a tomographic guide before bone harvesting (T1) and at 14 days (T2) and 6 months (T3) after the surgical procedures. Measurements were obtained in 2D (area, mm(2)) and 3D (volume, mm(3)), and were subsequently compared. In the 2D analysis, the mean bone formation rate was 56%, while for the 3D analysis the mean rate was 9.7%. Despite this difference, there was a significant correlation between area and volume measurements. Our findings demonstrated the presence of hard tissue in the mandibular ramus at 6 months after bone harvesting, which suggests that it would be possible to reuse the same region for a second block harvesting. However, the second bone harvesting would involve less bone for transplantation when compared to the first bone harvesting.
引用
收藏
页码:335 / 340
页数:6
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
ADELL R, 1990, International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants, V5, P347
[2]   Mandibular Ramus/Coronoid Process Grafts in Maxillofacial Reconstructive Surgery [J].
Amrani, Saar ;
Anastassov, George E. ;
Montazem, Andre H. .
JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2010, 68 (03) :641-646
[3]  
Bastos A.S., 2012, J ORAL IMPLANTOL
[4]  
Brugnami Federico, 2009, Keio Journal of Medicine, V58, P24
[5]  
BUSER D, 1995, INT J PERIODONT REST, V15, P11
[6]   Autogenous onlay bone grafts vs. alveolar distraction osteogenesis for the correction of vertically deficient edentulous ridges: a 2-4-year prospective study on humans [J].
Chiapasco, Matteo ;
Zaniboni, Marco ;
Rimondini, Lia .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2007, 18 (04) :432-440
[7]  
Chiapasco M, 2009, INT J ORAL MAX IMPL, V24, P237
[8]   Inlay-onlay grafting for three-dimensional reconstruction of the posterior atrophic maxilla with mandibular bone [J].
Cordaro, L. ;
Torsello, F. ;
Ribeiro, C. Accorsi ;
Liberatore, M. ;
di Torresanto, V. Mirisola .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2010, 39 (04) :350-357
[9]  
Corinaldesi G, 2009, INT J ORAL MAX IMPL, V24, P1119
[10]   Reconstruction of Atrophied Posterior Mandible With Inlay Technique and Mandibular Ramus Block Graft for implant Prosthetic Rehabilitation [J].
Felice, Pietro ;
Iezzi, Giovanna ;
Lizio, Giuseppe ;
Piattelli, Adriano ;
Marchetti, Clatidio .
JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2009, 67 (02) :372-380