Delivering successful randomized controlled trials in surgery: Methods to optimize collaboration and study design

被引:31
作者
Blencowe, Natalie S. [1 ]
Cook, Jonathan A. [2 ]
Pinkney, Thomas [3 ]
Rogers, Chris [4 ]
Reeves, Barnaby C. [4 ]
Blazeby, Jane M. [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bristol, Sch Social & Community Med, Surg Res Ctr, Bristol BS8 2PS, Avon, England
[2] Univ Oxford, Nuffield Dept Orthoped Rheumatol & Musculoskeleta, Ctr Stat Med, Oxford, England
[3] Univ Birmingham, Queen Elizabeth Hosp Birmingham, Sch Canc Sci, Acad Dept Surg, Birmingham, AL USA
[4] Univ Bristol, Sch Clin Sci, Clin Trials Evaluat Unit, Bristol, Avon, England
[5] Univ Hosp Bristol NHS Fdn Trust, Div Surg Head & Neck, Bristol, Avon, England
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Surgery; randomized controlled trials; methodology; collaboration; pre-trial work; pilot and feasibility studies; SURGICAL RESEARCH; INTERVENTIONS; FEASIBILITY; PROTOCOL; ISSUES;
D O I
10.1177/1740774516687272
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Randomized controlled trials in surgery are notoriously difficult to design and conduct due to numerous methodological and cultural challenges. Over the last 5 years, several UK-based surgical trial-related initiatives have been funded to address these issues. These include the development of Surgical Trials Centers and Surgical Specialty Leads (individual surgeons responsible for championing randomized controlled trials in their specialist fields), both funded by the Royal College of Surgeons of England; networks of research-active surgeons in training; and investment in methodological research relating to surgical randomized controlled trials (to address issues such as recruitment, blinding, and the selection and standardization of interventions). This article discusses these initiatives more in detail and provides exemplar cases to illustrate how the methodological challenges have been tackled. The initiatives have surpassed expectations, resulting in a renaissance in surgical research throughout the United Kingdom, such that the number of patients entering surgical randomized controlled trials has doubled.
引用
收藏
页码:211 / 218
页数:8
相关论文
共 35 条
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2016, BRIT J SURG, V103, P1738
[3]   The feasibility of a randomized controlled trial of esophagectomy for esophageal cancer - the ROMIO (Randomized Oesophagectomy: Minimally Invasive or Open) study: protocol for a randomized controlled trial [J].
Avery, Kerry N. L. ;
Metcalfe, Chris ;
Berrisford, Richard ;
Barham, C. Paul ;
Donovan, Jenny L. ;
Elliott, Jackie ;
Falk, Stephen J. ;
Goldin, Rob ;
Hanna, George ;
Hollowood, Andrew A. ;
Krysztopik, Richard ;
Noble, Sian ;
Sanders, Grant ;
Streets, Christopher G. ;
Titcomb, Dan R. ;
Wheatley, Tim ;
Blazeby, Jane M. .
TRIALS, 2014, 15
[4]   Surgical research collaboratives in the UK [J].
Bhangu, Aneel ;
Kolias, Angelos G. ;
Pinkney, Thomas ;
Hall, Nigel J. ;
Fitzgerald, J. Edward .
LANCET, 2013, 382 (9898) :1091-1092
[5]   Providing adequate and practical descriptions in surgical trials [J].
Blencowe, Natalie ;
Mills, Nicola ;
Whiting, Penny ;
Blazeby, Jane .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2013, 347
[6]   Novel ways to explore surgical interventions in randomised controlled trials: applying case study methodology in the operating theatre [J].
Blencowe, Natalie S. ;
Blazeby, Jane M. ;
Donovan, Jenny L. ;
Mills, Nicola .
TRIALS, 2015, 16
[7]   Interventions in randomised controlled trials in surgery: issues to consider during trial design [J].
Blencowe, Natalie S. ;
Brown, Julia M. ;
Cook, Jonathan A. ;
Metcalfe, Chris ;
Morton, Dion G. ;
Nicholl, Jon ;
Sharples, Linda D. ;
Treweek, Shaun ;
Blazeby, Jane M. d .
TRIALS, 2015, 16
[8]  
Bluebelle Study Group, 2016, BMJ Open, V6
[9]   Feasibility study of analgesia via epidural versus continuous wound infusion after laparoscopic colorectal resection [J].
Boulind, C. E. ;
Ewings, P. ;
Bulley, S. H. ;
Reid, J. M. ;
Jenkins, J. T. ;
Blazeby, J. M. ;
Francis, N. K. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2013, 100 (03) :395-402
[10]  
Buxton MJ., 1987, EC APPRAISAL HLTH TE, P103