Can artificial intelligences be moral agents?

被引:24
作者
Brozek, Bartosz [1 ,2 ]
Janik, Bartosz [1 ]
机构
[1] Jagiellonian Univ, Dept Philosophy Law & Legal Eth, Bracka 12, PL-31005 Krakow, Poland
[2] Copernicus Ctr Interdisciplinary Studies, Szczepanska 1, PL-31011 Krakow, Poland
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.newideapsych.2018.12.002
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The paper addresses the question whether artificial intelligences can be moral agents. We begin by observing that philosophical accounts of moral agency, in particular Kantianism and utilitarianism, are very abstract theoretical constructions: no human being can ever be a Kantian or a utilitarian moral agent. Ironically, it is easier for a machine to approximate this idealised type of agency than it is for homo sapiens. We then proceed to outline the structure of human moral practices. Against this background, we identify two conditions of moral agency: internal and external. We argue further that the existing AI architectures are unable to meet the two conditions. In consequence, machines - at least at the current stage of their development - cannot be considered moral agents.
引用
收藏
页码:101 / 106
页数:6
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]   Prolegomena to any future artificial moral agent [J].
Allen, C ;
Varner, G ;
Zinser, J .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL & THEORETICAL ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2000, 12 (03) :251-261
[2]  
Anderson Michael, 2011, MACHINE ETHICS
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1996, The Emotional Brain
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1987, The biology of moral systems
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2005, Moral sentiments and material interests: The foundations of cooperation in economic life
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2002, Creativity, cognition, and knowledge: an interaction
[7]   Intuitive decision making in complex situations: Somatic markers in an artificial grammar learning task [J].
Bierman, DJ ;
Destrebecqz, A ;
Cleeremans, A .
COGNITIVE AFFECTIVE & BEHAVIORAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2005, 5 (03) :297-305
[8]  
Brey P, 2014, PHILOS ENG TECHNOL, V17, P125, DOI 10.1007/978-94-007-7914-3_8
[9]  
Broek Bartosz., 2013, Rule-following: From imitation to the normative mind
[10]  
Brozek B., 2007, Rationality and Discourse