The Effect of Family Ownership on Different Dimensions of Corporate Social Responsibility: Evidence from Large US Firms

被引:200
作者
Block, Joern H. [1 ,2 ]
Wagner, Marcus [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Trier, D-54286 Trier, Germany
[2] Erasmus Univ, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[3] Univ Wurzburg, D-97070 Wurzburg, Bavaria, Germany
关键词
family; ownership; CSR; ENVIRONMENTAL-MANAGEMENT; STAKEHOLDER ORIENTATION; SOCIOEMOTIONAL WEALTH; FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE; BUSINESS; IDENTITY; GOVERNANCE; AGENCY; IMPACT; SIZE;
D O I
10.1002/bse.1798
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Previous research has shown that family firms differ from non-family firms with regard to aggregate measures of corporate social responsibility (CSR). We argue that CSR is a multidimensional concept that comprises several aspects, which range from employee relations to ecological concerns and product issues. Based on an organizational and family identity perspective, we argue that the effect of family ownership can differ across various CSR dimensions. Family firms can be responsible and irresponsible regarding CSR at the same time. We use a dataset of large US firms to test our hypotheses. Our Bayesian regressions show that family ownership is negatively associated with community-related CSR performance and positively associated with diversity-, employee-, environment- and product-related aspects of CSR. The largest positive effect of family ownership on CSR performance exists with regard to product-related aspects of CSR. Copyright (c) 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment
引用
收藏
页码:475 / 492
页数:18
相关论文
共 111 条
[1]   Corporate governance and social responsibility: a comparative analysis of the UK and the US [J].
Aguilera, RV ;
Williams, CA ;
Conley, JM ;
Rupp, DE .
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE-AN INTERNATIONAL REVIEW, 2006, 14 (03) :147-158
[2]  
Albert Stuart., 1985, RES ORGAN BEHAV, V7, P263, DOI DOI 10.1177/1059601112473815
[3]   Ownership studies: The data source does matter [J].
Anderson, RC ;
Lee, DS .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL AND QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS, 1997, 32 (03) :311-329
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2010, FAM BUS REV, DOI DOI 10.1177/089448651002300202
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2010, Journal of Family Business Strategy, DOI [10.1016/j.jfbs.2009.12.003, DOI 10.1016/J.JFBS.2009.12.003]
[6]   SOCIAL IRRESPONSIBILITY IN MANAGEMENT [J].
ARMSTRONG, JS .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 1977, 5 (03) :185-213
[7]   SOCIAL IDENTITY THEORY AND THE ORGANIZATION [J].
ASHFORTH, BE ;
MAEL, F .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 1989, 14 (01) :20-39
[8]  
Astrachan J.H., 1988, Family Business Review, V1, P165, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1741-6248.1988.00165.X
[9]   Beyond dichotomy: The curvilinear relationship between social responsibility and financial performance [J].
Barnett, Michael L. ;
Salomon, Robert M. .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2006, 27 (11) :1101-1122
[10]   Private politics, corporate social responsibility, and integrated strategy [J].
Baron, DP .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS & MANAGEMENT STRATEGY, 2001, 10 (01) :7-45