Motivation under the microscope: Understanding undergraduate science students' multiple motivations for research

被引:28
作者
Smith, Jessi L. [1 ]
Deemer, Eric D. [2 ]
Thoman, Dustin B. [3 ]
Zazworsky, Lisa [3 ]
机构
[1] Montana State Univ, Dept Psychol, Bozeman, MT 59717 USA
[2] Purdue Univ, Dept Educ Studies, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA
[3] Calif State Univ Long Beach, Dept Psychol, Long Beach, CA 90840 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Science; Latent profile; Self-determination theory; Motivation; Multiple goals; SELF-DETERMINATION THEORY; ACHIEVEMENT GOAL THEORY; LATENT PROFILE ANALYSIS; INTRINSIC MOTIVATION; MEASUREMENT INVARIANCE; TASK ENGAGEMENT; PERFORMANCE; MODEL; REWARDS; CLASSROOM;
D O I
10.1007/s11031-013-9388-8
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Little is known about students' motivations toward scientific research or the implications of pursuing multiple research motivations simultaneously. We conducted latent profile analysis (a person-centered statistical technique) on 1,052 undergraduate students from three universities enrolled in physics, chemistry, and biology laboratory sections. Based on a tripartite model that conceptualizes research motivations as intrinsic, extrinsic, and failure avoidant, analyses revealed five distinct research motivational profiles which were described as Unmotivated; Neutral Engagement, Ternary-Driven; Emerging Engagement; and High Engagement. Profile membership was associated with differences in science class experiences, science identity, and future research intentions. Results showed students were optimally motivated toward science when highly endorsing both intrinsic and extrinsic motivations, with low failure avoidance. These findings contribute to the literature on self-determination theory, intrinsic motivation and multiple goals, and these data create a framework for understanding undergraduate science laboratory experiences that may aid in efforts to broaden the participation of students in science.
引用
收藏
页码:496 / 512
页数:17
相关论文
共 103 条
[1]  
Allen D. E., 1996, New Directions for Teaching and Learning Series, V68, P43, DOI [10.1002/tl.37219966808, DOI 10.1002/TL.37219966808]
[2]   THE WORK PREFERENCE INVENTORY - ASSESSING INTRINSIC AND EXTRINSIC MOTIVATIONAL ORIENTATIONS [J].
AMABILE, TM ;
HILL, KG ;
HENNESSEY, BA ;
TIGHE, EM .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1994, 66 (05) :950-967
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2005, HDB COMPETENCE MOTIV
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2010, WHY SO FEW WOMEN SCI
[5]  
[Anonymous], WOM MIN PERS DIS SCI
[6]  
[Anonymous], INT J INTEGRATING TE, DOI DOI 10.5121/IJITE.2013.2101
[7]  
[Anonymous], PSYCHOL B
[8]  
[Anonymous], ASSESSMENT EVALUATIO
[9]  
[Anonymous], 1997, TALKING LEAVING
[10]   Identified Versus Introjected Approach and Introjected Avoidance Motivations in School and in Sports: The Limited Benefits of Self-Worth Strivings [J].
Assor, Avi ;
Vansteenkiste, Maarten ;
Kaplan, Avi .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2009, 101 (02) :482-497